Hibernate and spring - An analysis of maintainability against performance

Danny Alejandro Alvarez-Eraso; Fernando Arango-Isaza

doi:10.17533/udea.redin.n80a11

Autores/as

Danny Alejandro Alvarez-Eraso Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Fernando Arango-Isaza Universidad Nacional de Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-2554

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n80a11

Palabras clave:

ORM, desempeño, spring framework, hibernate, mantenibilidad

Resumen

Los frameworks para el desarrollo de aplicaciones web y las herramientas ORM permiten reducir el tiempo y esfuerzo al producir aplicaciones de software de calidad. Se han hecho estudios comparativos sobre estas herramientas pero dado que son numerosas y heterogéneas, escoger la más adecuada no es fácil. Hay estudios comparativos sobre estas herramientas, sin embargo no consideraron un dominio suficientemente complejo que permitan medir más precisamente sus ventajas y desventajas. Para aportar en la solución, comparamos el tiempo de respuesta de diferentes consultas en un dominio más complejo y con diferentes tamaños de base de datos. La comparación basada en este aspecto es importante ya que los ORM son un factor de mantenibilidad importante y porque consultas no optimizadas pueden conducir a cuellos de botella.

|Resumen

= 340 veces | PDF (ENGLISH)

= 173 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Danny Alejandro Alvarez-Eraso, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Facultad de Minas.

Fernando Arango-Isaza, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Facultad de Minas.

Citas

G. Booch, “Object-oriented development”, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. SE-12, no. 2, pp. 211–221, 1986.

V. Srinivasan and D. Chang, “Object persistence in object-oriented applications”, IBM Syst. J., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 66-87, 1997.

I. Vuksanovic and B. Sudarevic, “Use of Web Application Frameworks in the Development of Small Applications”, in 34th Int. Conv. MIPRO, Opatija, Croatia, 2011, pp. 458–462.

G. Low and S. Huan, “Impact of object oriented development on software quality”, in 9th International Workshop Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP), Pittsburgh, USA, 1999, pp. 3–11.

N. Wilde and R. Huitt, “Maintenance support for object- oriented programs”, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1038–1044, 1992.

J. Kienzle and A. Romanovsky, “Framework based on design patterns for providing persistence in object- oriented programming languages”, IEE Proc. - Softw., vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 77-85, 2002.

C. Ireland, D. Bowers, M. Newton and K. Waugh, “A Classification of Object-Relational Impedance Mismatch”, in 1st International Confernce on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications (DBKDA), Gosier, France, 2009, pp. 36–43.

C. Murdaca, “An Object-Relational Compiler”, in 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, Los Angeles, USA, 2009, pp. 438–442.

H. Abelson, G. Sussman and J. Sussman, Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, 2nd ed. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press, 1996.

M. Cuervo, D. Peñalosa and A. Alarcón, “Evaluación y análisis de rendimiento de los frameworks de persistencia Hibernate y Eclipselink”, Ventana Informática, no. 24, pp. 9-23, 2011.

Z. Zhou and Z. Chen, “Performance Evaluation of Transparent Persistence Layer in Java Applications”, in International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC), Huangshan, China, 2010, pp. 21–26.

P. van Zyl, D. Kourie and A. Boake, “Comparing the performance of object databases and ORM tools”, in Annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing couuntries (SAICSIT), New York, USA, 2006, pp. 1–11.

K. Roopak, K. Swati, S. Ritesh and S. Chickerur, “Performance Comparison of Relational Database with Object Database (DB4o)”, in 5th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), Mathura, India, 2013, pp. 512–515.

Hibernate, Hibernate. Everything data. [Online]. Available: http://hibernate.org/. Accessed on: Mar. 10, 2016.

Hotframeworks, Web framework rankings | HotFrameworks. [Online]. Available: http://hotframeworks.com/. Accessed on: May. 26, 2015.

T. Shan, W. Bank and W. Hua, “Taxonomy of Java Web Application Frameworks”, IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), Shanghai, China, 2006, pp. 378-385.

V. Nagy, “Performance Analysis of Relational Databases, Object-Oriented Databases and ORM Frameworks”, Bachelor Degree Project, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden, 2014.

J. Arthur and S. Azadegan, “Spring Framework for Rapid Open Source J2EE Web Application Development: A Case Study”, in 6th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing and 1st ACIS International Workshop on Self- Assembling Wireless Network (SNPD/SAWN), Towson, USA, 2005, pp. 90–95.

P. Węgrzynowicz, “Performance antipatterns of one to many association in hibernate”, in Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Kraków, Poland, 2013, pp. 1475– 1481.

Object Management Group (OMG), Unified Modeling Language TM (UML®). [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/. Accessed on: Apr. 20, 2016.

G. Krasner and S. Pope, “A description of the model- view-controller user interface paradigm in the smalltalk-80 system”, J. Object Oriented Program., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 26–49, 1988.

G. King, “Chapter 7. Collection mapping”, in HIBERNATE - Relational Persistence for Idiomatic Java, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/3.6/reference/en-US/html/collections.html. Accessed on: Dec. 18. 2015.

Oracle Corporation, Core J2EE Patterns - Data Access Object, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/dataaccessobject-138824. html. Accessed on: Apr. 25, 2015.

Oracle Corporation, Java SE Desktop Technologies. [Online]. Available: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/index-jsp-138795.html. Accessed on: May 25, 2015.