Willingness to pay for reducing travel time in Tunja (Colombia): A comparison between students and workers with a mixed logit model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n78a11756Keywords:
Willingness to pay, stated-preference surveys, discrete choice experiments, mixed logit modelAbstract
The difference in willingness to pay to reduce travel time between students and workers was analyzed in a context of transportation mode choice in the city of Tunja (Colombia). A mixed logit model was used to this end. The model was calibrated with data collected in a stated preference survey applied in the city. The model assumed random coefficients for access time, waiting time and travel time. With this specification, the willingness to pay to reduce travel time was valued at COP 38.14/min for students. Lower income workers exhibited a 23% increase in the value of time, while higher-income workers showed an increase of 73% compared to the assessment made for students. Finally, it was found that the ratio between the value of waiting time and the value of travel time is 1.95, while the ratio between the value of access time and the value of travel time is 2.57, which is considered valid only for this context.
Downloads
References
Alpkokin, Pelin (2012). “Historical and critical review of spatial and transport planning in the Netherlands”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 3, July 2012, pp. 536-547.
Amador, Francisco Javier y González, Rosa Marina (2005). “El valor subjetivo del tiempo de viaje de los estudiantes universitarios cuando las preferencias son heterogéneas”, Revista de Economía Pública, No. 174, Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 25-41.
Ardila, Arturo (2005). “Cinco cuestionamientos y una recomendación a los autores del artículo Una evaluación económica del sistema Transmilenio”, Revista de Ingeniería Universidad de Los Andes, No. 22, Noviembre 2005, pp. 152-162.
Bhatta, Bharat P. & Larsen, Odd I. (2011). “Errors in variables in multinomial choice modeling: A simulation study applied to a multinomial logit model of travel mode choice”, Transport Policy, Vol. 18, Issue 2, March 2011, pp. 326-335.
Ben-Akiva, Moshe & Lerman, Steven R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis. Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
Bliemer, Michiel & Rose, John M (2009). “Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice experiments”, 88th Annual TRB Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 2009, pp. 11.
Brown, David & Ryan, Lisa (2011). “Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 31, issue 3, April 2011, pp. 226-233.
Brueckner, Jan (2005). “Transport subsidies, system choice and urban sprawl”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 35, issue 6, November 2005, pp. 715-733.
Calfee, John & Winston, Clifford (1998). “The value of automobile travel time: Implications for congestion policy”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 69, 1998, pp. 83-102.
Caliper Corporation (2008). Travel Demand Modeling with TransCAD 5.0, USA, Caliper Corporation.
Cerda, Arcadio; García, Leidy; Bahamondez, Alejandra y Poblete, Viviana (2010). “Disposición a pagar para mejorar la calidad del aire en Talca, Lecturas de Economía, No. 72, enero-junio 2010, pp. 195-211.
De Borger, Bruno & Fosgerau, Mogens (2008). “The trade-off between money and travel time: A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 64, 2008, pp. 101-115.
Echeverri, Juan Carlos; Ibáñez, Ana María y Moya, Andrés (2005). “Una evaluación económica del Sistema Transmilenio”, Revista de Ingeniería Universidad de Los Andes, No. 21, Mayo 2005, pp. 68-77.
Gaudry, Marc. J. ; Jara-Díaz, Sergio R. & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios (1989). “Value of time sensitivity to model specification”, Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 23, Issue 2, April 1989, pp. 151-158.
Habibi, Sara. & Asadi, Naser (2011). “Causes, Results and Methods of Controlling Urban Sprawl”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 21, 2011, pp. 133-141.
Handy, Susan (2005). “Smart growth and the transportation–land use connection: What does the research tell us?”, International Regional Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2005, pp. 146–167.
Hensher, David A. & Greene, William H. (2003). “The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice”, Transportation, Volume 30, No. 2,, 2003, pp. 133-176.
Hess, Stephane; Bierlaire, Michel & Polak, John W. (2005). “Estimation of value-of-time using Mixed Logit models”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, Issues 2–3, February–March 2005, pp. 221-236.
Holz-Rau, Christian & Scheiner, Joachim (2011). “Safety and travel time in cost–benefit analysis: A sensitivity analysis for North Rhine-Westphalia”, Transport Policy, Vol. 18, 2011, pp. 336-346.
Inturri, Giuseppe & Ignaccolo, Matteo (2011). “Modelling the impact of alternative pricing policies on an urban multimodal traffic corridor”, Transport Policy, Vol. 18, issue 6, November 2011, pp. 777-785.
Jiang, Meilan & Morikawa, Takayuki (2004). “Theoretical analysis on the variation of value of travel time savings”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 38, issue 8, October 2004, pp. 551-571.
Kamakura, Wagner A. & Russell, Gary J. (1989). “A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26, 1989, pp. 379-390.
Kidokoro, Yukihiro (2006). “Benefit estimation of transport projects – A representative consumer approach”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological Vol. 40, Issue 7 2006, pp. 521-542.
Koçur, George; Adler, Thomas; Hyman, William & Audet, E. (1982). Guide to forecasting travel demand with direct utility measurement, UMTA, Washington D. C., USA Department of Transportation.
Lakshmanan, T.R.; Nijkamp, Peter; Rietveld, Piet & Verhoef, Erik Teodoor (2001). “Benefits and costs of transport Classification, methodologies and policies”, Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 80, Issue 2, April 2001, pp. 139-164.
Levaggi, Rosella (2010). “From local to global public goods: How should externalities be represented?”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 27, Issue 5, September 2010, pp. 1040-1042.
Márquez, Luis (2011). “La movilidad en Tunja: una mirada al último tercio del siglo XX”. En: Llanos, Julián Andrés. (Ed.), Miradas urbanas de Tunja en el siglo XX: aproximaciones a la ciudad intermedia (pp. 44-72). Tunja, Colombia: Universidad de Boyacá.
Márquez, Luis y Jaimes, Henry (2009). “Modelo de demanda para un tren de pasajeros entre Tunja y Bogotá”, Revista de Ingeniería Universidad de Los Andes, No. 30, Noviembre de 2009, pp. 16-24.
McFadden, Daniel & Train, Kenneth (2000). “Mixed MNL Models for discrete response”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, No. 15, 2000, pp. 447-470.
Orro, Alfonso (2005). Modelos de elección discreta en transportes con coeficientes aleatorios. Tesis doctoral, Programa de Doctorado: Ingeniería Civil, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad de A Coruña, España, 2005.
Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Rizzi, Luis Ignacio (2001). “Valuation of Road Fatalities: A Stated Preference Approach”. En: Hensher, David (Ed.), Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge (pp. 825-839), Pergamon, Oxford.
Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Willumsen, Luis G. (2011). Modelling Transport, 4th edition, Chichester, United Kingdom, Jhon Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Patriksson, Michael (1994). The traffic assignment problem: models and methods, Linköping, Sweden, Linköping Institute of Technology.
Santos, Georigina; Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander (2010). “Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport”, Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 28, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 46-91.
Sheffi, Yosef (1985). Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods, New Yersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.
Shepherd, Simon; Timms, Paul & May, Anthony. (2006). “Modelling requirements for local transport plans: An assessment of English experience”, Transport Policy, Vol. 13, Issue 4, July 2006, pp. 307-317.
Sillano, Mauricio & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios (2005). “Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence”, Environment and Planning, A Vol. 37, Issue 3, 2005, pp. 525-550.
Small, Kenneth; Winston, Clifford & Yan, Jia (2005). “Uncovering the distribution of motorists’ preferences for travel time and reliability”, Econometrica 73, Issue 4, 2005, pp. 1367-1382.
Stevens, Alan (2004). “The application and limitations of Cost-Benefit Assessment (CBA) for intelligent transport systems”, Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 8, 2004, pp. 91-111.
Talviti, Aseliike (2000). “Evaluation of road projects and programs in developing countries”, Transport Policy, Vol. 7, Issue 1, January 2000, pp. 61-72.
Train, Kenneth (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.
Universidad de Los Andes e Instituto Ser (2003). Asesoría para formular una política para desarrollar la evaluación económica de proyectos de transporte urbano de pasajeros en Colombia, Bogotá, Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
Vickerman, Roger (2007). “Cost–benefit analysis and large–scale infrastructure projects: state of the art and challenges”, Environment and Planning Part B, Vol, 34, Issue 4, 2007, pp. 598-610.
Wardman, Mark (2001). “A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuations”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 37, Issues 2–3, April–July 2001, pp. 107-128.
Wardman, Mark (1998). “The Value of Travel Time: A Review of British Evidence”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, No. 32, 1998, pp. 285-316.
Zwerina, Klaus; Huber, Joel & Kuhfeld, Warren F. (2005) “MR-2010E – A General Method for Constructing Efficient Choice Designs”, SAS Institute Inc., 2005, disponible en: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010e.pdf (Marzo de 2010).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This page, by Universidad de Antioquia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License allowing others to share it as long as they acknowledge its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that these arrangements be not for profit and the journal be acknowledged as the original source of publication.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their papers online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites), as it can lead to valuable exchanges as well as greater citation of the published work.