Les différences dans les motivations et la réussite scolaire
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n78a14330Mots-clés :
motivation intrinsèque, éducation, TICs, scienceRésumé
Cet article présente des nouveaux résultats concernant l'effet de la motivation des élèves dans leur réussite scolaire, à partir des données disponibles dans l'examen effectué par le Programme for International Student Assessment de l'OCDE en 2006 (PISA 2006). Les résultats montrent que la motivation a un effet positif sur la réussite scolaire. Pour ce faire, nous utilisons la méthode des variables instrumentales de régression quantile, ce qui nous a permis d'estimer les différents coefficients pour les variables explicatives, tout au long de la distribution des scores dans l’examen, et corriger ainsi l'endogénéité possible de la variable motivation. Etant donne le fait que la motivation dépend des scores dans un examen, nos résultats soulignent l'importance de concevoir des politiques qui favorisent la motivation axée sur la réussite scolaire.
Téléchargements
Références
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for All Americans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Al-Samarrai, Samer (2002). “Achieving education for all: How much does money matter?”, Journal of International Development ,Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 179-206.
Barrera-Osorio, Felipe and Linden, Leigh (2009). “The use and misuse of computers in education evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia”, Impact Evaluation Series, No. 29, WPS4836, pp. 1-41.
Betts, Julian (1996). “The role of homework in improving school quality”, Discussion Paper 96-16, pp. 1-45.
Bishop, John (1989). “Is the test score decline responsible for the productivity growth decline?”, American Economic Review, Vol. 79, Issue 1, pp. 178-197.
Bishop, John (1992). “The impact of academic competencies on wages, unemployment, and job performance”, Series on Public Policy Vol. 37, pp. 127-194.
Bishop, John (1997). “The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exam on achievement”, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 87, Issue 2, pp. 260-264.
Bishop, John (1999). “Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency?”, Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 6, pp. 349-398.
Bishop, John (2006). “Drinking from the fountain of knowledge: Student incentive to study and learn. Externalities, information problems, and peer pressure”. In: Eric A. Hanushek and Finis Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (pp. 909-944) Amsterdam, North Holland.
Bishop, John; Bishop, Matthew; Gelbwasser, Lara; Green, Shanna and Zuckerman, Andrew (2003). “Nerds and freaks: A theory of student culture and norms”, Brookings Papers on Education Policy, No. 6, pp. 141- 213.
Boissiere, Maurice; Knight, John and Sabot, Richard (1985). “Earnings, schooling, ability, and cognitive skills”, American Economic Review, Vol. 75, Issue 5, pp. 1016-1030.
Chernozhukov, Victor and Hansen, Christian (2008). “Instrumental variable quantile regression”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 142, Issue 1, pp. 379-398.
Chernozhukov, Victor; Hansen, Christian and Jansson, Michael (2007). “Inference approaches for instrumental variable quantile regression”, Economics Letters, Vol. 95, Issue 2, pp. 272-277.
Coleman, James; Campbell, Ernest; Hobson, Carol; Mcpartlet, James; Mood, Alexander; Weinfeld, Frederic & York, Robert (1966). Equality of educational opportunity, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office.
Colletta, Alfred & Chiappetta, Eugen (1994). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary School, New York, Macmillan Publishing.
Cooper, Harris (1989). Homework, White Plains, Longman.
Deci, Edward; Koestner, Richard & Ryan, Richard (1999). “A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 125, Issue 6, pp. 627-668.
Deci, Edward; Vellerand, Robert; Pelletier, Luc & Ryan, Richard (1991). “Motivation and education: The Self-Determination Perspective.”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 26, Issue 3-4, pp. 324-346.
Dzama, Emmanuel & Osborne, Jonathan (1999). “Poor performance in science among african students: An alternative explanation to the African worldview thesis”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 36, Issue 3, pp. 387-405.
Eisenberger, Robert; Pierce, David & Cameron, Judy (1999). “Effect of external reward on intrinsic motivation- negative, neutral and positive”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 125, Issue 6, pp. 677-691.
Eisenkopf, Gerald (2008). “Peer Effects, Motivation, and Learning University of Konstanz”, Department of Economics, Unpublished manuscript.
Fuchs, Thomas & Woessmann, Ludger (2008). “What accounts for international differences in student performance?: A re-examination using PISA data”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 32, Issue 2-3, pp. 433-464.
Gottfried, Adele (1985). “Academic Intrinsic Motivation in young elementary and junior high students”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 77, Issue 6, pp. 631-645.
Hanushek, Eric (1998). “Conclussion and controversies about the effectiveness of school resources”, Economic Policy Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.11-28.
Hoxby, Caroline (2000). “Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation,” NBER Working Papers, No. 7867, p.1-64.
Koaler, Olaf; Baumert, Jünger and Shnabel, Kai (2001). “Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics”, Journal for Research in Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 32, Issue 5, pp. 448-470.
Koenker, Roger (2004). “Quantile regression for longitudinal data”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Vol. 91, Issue 1, pp. 74-89.
Koenker, Roger & Bassett, Gilbert (1978). “Regression quantiles”, Econometrica, Vol. 46, No.1, pp. 33-50.
Lazear, Edward (2001). “Educational production”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 777-802.
Lee, Jong-Wha & Barro, Robert (2001). “Schooling quality in a cross section of countries”, Economica, Vol. 68, No. 272, pp. 465-488.
Linden, Leigh (2008). “Complement or substitute? The effect of technology on student achievement in India”, Columbia University, Mimeo.
Nasr, Ahmad & Soltani, Asghar (2011). “Attitude towards biology and its effect on students achievement”, International Journal of Biology, Vol 3, No. 4, pp. 100-104.
OECD (2009). “Pisa 2006: Technical Report”, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, available at: www.pisa.oecd.org (Octubre 10 de 2012).
Oliver, J. Steve & Simpson, Ronald (1988). “Influences of attitude towards science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study”, Science Education, Vol. 72, Issue 2, pp. 143-155.
Powell, David (2009). “Unconditional quantile regression for panel data with exogenous or endogenous regressors”, RAND Labor and Population Working Paper, WR-710, pp. 1-39.
Sacerdote, Bruce (2002). “The nature and nurture of economic outcomes”, American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 344-348.
Sharma, Dhiraj (2010). “Incentives for academic achievement: An experimental study”. In: 2010 Annual Meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, July 25-27, Denver, Colorado.
Sula, Ozan (2008). “Demand for international reserves: A quantile regression approach”, MPRA Paper, No 11680, pp. 1-20.
Vandenberghe, Vincent & Belot, Michèle (2010). “Evaluating the “threat” effects of grade repetition. Exploiting the 2001 reform by the Frenchspeaking Community of Belgium”. In: Mancebón, María Jesús; Pérez, Domingo; Gómez, José María and Giménez, Gregorio (Eds.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación (Vol. 5) (pp. 185-204). España, Asosiación de Economía de la Educación. Available at: http://repec.economicsofeducation.com/2010zaragoza/05-09.pdf
Walter, Janet & Hart, Janelle (2009). “Understanding the complexities of student motivations in mathematics learning”, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 28, Issue 1-2, pp. 162-170.
Woessmann, Ludger (2003). “Schooling resources, educational institutions, and student performance: The international evidence”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65, Issue 2, pp. 117-170.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette page, par Universidad de Antioquia, est autorisée sous une Licence d'attribution Creative Commons.
Les auteurs qui publient avec cette revue acceptent de conserver les droits d'auteur et d'accorder le droit de première publication à la revue, l'article sous licence sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike permettant à d'autres de le partager tant qu'ils reconnaissent sa paternité et sa publication originale dans ce journal.
Les auteurs peuvent conclure des accords contractuels supplémentaires et distincts pour la distribution non exclusive de la version publiée de la revue (par exemple, la publier dans un référentiel institutionnel ou la publier dans un livre), à condition que ces accords soient sans but lucratif et être reconnu comme la source originale de publication.
Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à publier leurs articles en ligne (par exemple, dans des dépôts institutionnels ou sur leurs sites Web), car cela peut conduire à de précieux échanges ainsi qu'à une plus grande citation des travaux publiés.
