Une analyse du rapport prix-volume à travers la causalité et l'effet du «jour de la semaine», appliquée aux marchés boursiers d'Amérique latine
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n83a01Mots-clés :
rapport volume-prix, effet du jour de la semaine, marchés émergents, causalité de GrangerRésumé
Cet article examine la relation entre les rendements journaliers et les volumes de négociations boursières. Pour ce faire, nous utilisons le test de causalité de Granger et l'effet du « jour de la semaine », appliqués aux principaux marchés boursiers d'Amérique latine pour la période 1998-2014. Nous analysons les indices boursiers d’Argentine, Brésil, Chili, Colombie, Mexique et Pérou. Cette étude utilise des modèles à variance hétéroscédastiques et des modèles autorégressifs (VAR). Les résultats montrent, d’une part, la présence d'un fort effet
du « jour de la semaine » et, d’autre part, ils montrent une causalité des rendements des indices sur la variation des volumes de négociations boursières pour presque tous pays analysés.
Téléchargements
Références
Alt, Raimund; Fortin, Ines y Weinberger, Simon (2011). “The Monday effect revisited: An alternative testing approach”, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 447-460.
Baker, Kent; Rahman, Abdul y Saadi, Samir (2008). “The day-of-the-week effect and conditional volatility: Sensitivity of error distributional assumptions”, Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 280-295.
Blume, Lawrence; Easley, David y O’hara, Maureen (1994). “Market Statistics and Technical Analysis: The Role of Volume”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 153-181.
Bollerslev, Tim. (1986). “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity”, Journal of Economics, No. 31, pp. 307-327.
Chen, Shiu-Sheng (2012). “Revisiting the empirical linkages between stock returns and trading volumen”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 1781-1788.
Cho, Young-Hyun; Linton, Oliver y Whang Yoon-Jae (2007). “Are there Monday Effects in Stock Returns: A Stochastic Dominance Approach”, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 736-755.
Chordia, Tarun y Swaminathan, Bhaskaran (2000). “Trading volume and Cross-Autocorrelations in Stock returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 913-935.
Clark, Peter (1973). “A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices”, Econometrica, Vol. 41, pp. 135-155.
Copeland, Thomas (1976). “A model of asset trading under the assumption of sequential information arrival”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1149-1168.
Cross, Frank (1973). “The Behavior of Stock Prices on Fridays and Mondays”, Financial Analyst Journal, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 67-69.
Crouch, Robert (1970). “A Nonlinear Test of the Random-Walk Hypothesis”, American Economic Review, Vol. 60, pp. 199-202.
Damodaran, Aswath (1989). “The Weekend Effect in Information Releases: A Study of Earning and Dividend Announcements”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 607-623.
Dubois, Michael y Louvet, Pascal (1996). “The Day-of-the-Week Effect: The International Evidence”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 1463-1484.
Epps, Thomas y Epps, Mary Lee (1976). “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-Distributions Hypothesis”, Econometrica, Vol. 44, pp. 305-321.
Engle, Robert (1982). “Autorregresive Conditional Heteroscedasticity whit Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflations”, Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 987-1008.
Fama, Eugene (1965). “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices”, Journal of Business, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 34-105.
Fama, Eugene (1970). “Efficient Capital Markets: a Review of Theory and Empirical Work”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 383-417.
Field, Michael (1931). “Stock Prices: A Problem in Verification”, Journal of Business, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 415-418.
Foster, Douglas y Viswanathan, Sean (1990). “A theory of the interday variations in volume, variance, and trading costs in securities markets”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 593-624.
French, Kenneth (1980). “Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 55-69.
Gajdosová, Katarína; Heryán, Tomás y Tufan, Ekrem (2011). “Day of the week effect in the european emerging stock markets: Recent evidence from the financial crisis period”, Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Vol. 15, No. 19, pp. 38-51.
Gibbons, Micheal y Hess, Patrick (1981). “Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns”, Journal of Business, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 579-596.
Granger, Clive y Morgenster, Oskar (1963). “Spectral Analysis of New York Stock Market Prices”, Kyklos, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-27.
Granger, Clive (1969). “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods”, Econometrica, Vol. 36, pp. 424-438.
He, Zonglu y Maekawa, Koichi. (2001). “On spurious Granger causality”, Economics Letters, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 307-313.
He, Hua y Wang, Jiang (1995). “Differential Information and Dynamic Behavior of Stock Trading Volume”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 919-972.
Hiemstra, Craig y Jones, Jonathan (1994). “Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price-Volume Relation”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 1639-1664.
Jennings, Robert; Starks, Laura; Fellingham, John (1981). “An Equilibrium Model of Asset Trading with Sequential Information Arrival”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 143-161.
Kamath, Ravindra y Wang, Yi (2006). “The causality between stock index returns and volumes in the asian equity markets”, Journal of International Business Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 63-74.
Kamath, Ravindra y Wang, Yi (2011). “The price-volume relationship in the chilean stock market”, International Business & Economics Research Journal, Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 7-14.
Karpoff, Jonathan (1987). “The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 109-126.
Keim, Donald y Stambaugh, Robert (1984). “A further Investigation of the Weekend Effect in Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 819-835.
Kiymaz, Halil y Berument, Hakan (2003). “The day of the week effect on stock market volatility and volume: International evidence”, Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 363-380.
Kristjanpoller, Werner (2009). “Análisis del efecto día de semana en los mercados accionarios latinoamericanos”, Lecturas de Economía, Vol. 71, No. 71, pp. 189-207.
Morgan, Leuan (1976). “Stock prices and heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Business, Vol. 49, pp. 496-508.
Nelson, Daniel (1991). “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new Aproach”, Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 347-370.
Osbone, Maury (1959). “Brownian Motion in the Stock Market”, Operation Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 145-173.
Palacio, David (2009). “Modelación del efecto del día de la semana para los índices accionarios de Colombia mediante un modelo star Garch”, Revista de Economía del Rosario, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.
Rodríguez-Caballero, Carlos Vladimir y Ventosa-Santaulària, Daniel. (2014) “Granger Causality and Unit Roots”, Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, Vol.3, No.1, 97-114.
Rojas, Emilio y Kristjanpoller, Werner (2014). “Anomalías de calendario en los mercados accionarios latinoamericanos: Una revisión mediante el procedimiento de Bonferroni”, Lecturas de Economía, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 91- 113.
Saatcioglu, Kemai y Starks, Laura (1998). “The stock price-volume relationship in emerging stock markets: The case of Latin America”, International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 215-225.
Statman, Meir; Thorley, Steven y Vorkink, Keith (2006). “Investor overconfidence and trading volumen”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1531-1565.
Tauchen, George y Pitts, Mark (1983). “The price variability-volume relationship on speculative markets”, Econometrica, Vol. 51, pp. 485-505.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette page, par Universidad de Antioquia, est autorisée sous une Licence d'attribution Creative Commons.
Les auteurs qui publient avec cette revue acceptent de conserver les droits d'auteur et d'accorder le droit de première publication à la revue, l'article sous licence sous une licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike permettant à d'autres de le partager tant qu'ils reconnaissent sa paternité et sa publication originale dans ce journal.
Les auteurs peuvent conclure des accords contractuels supplémentaires et distincts pour la distribution non exclusive de la version publiée de la revue (par exemple, la publier dans un référentiel institutionnel ou la publier dans un livre), à condition que ces accords soient sans but lucratif et être reconnu comme la source originale de publication.
Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à publier leurs articles en ligne (par exemple, dans des dépôts institutionnels ou sur leurs sites Web), car cela peut conduire à de précieux échanges ainsi qu'à une plus grande citation des travaux publiés.