Understanding aquaculture certification

Authors

  • Daniel Lee Global Aquaculture Alliance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324459

Abstract

When consumers select seafood products from displays or from restaurant menus, they can easily base their choice on a quick assessment of key attributes such as price, quality, convenience and origin. But refi ning their choices further, based on food safety, ethical, environmental or animal welfare grounds, is more diffi cult because of a shortage of reliable, independent information (Wessells et al., 1999). In essence, it is this information gap that opens the way for seafood certifi cation and eco-labelling schemes. Such schemes have the potential to link a consumer’s responsible choices with a producer’s responsible practices and to deliver market rewards accordingly (Wessells et al., 2001, Philips et al., 2003, FAO/NACA 2007).

Well, at least that is the theory. In practice it is not clear if consumer choice alone is enough to drive and sustain all certifi cation schemes. For example, as Mathew (2004) notes for fi shery products, there is as yet no clear signal from the market that the price for eco-labelled fi sh could more than offset the costs of certifi cation. In the absence of consistent market incentives, the question remains as to what is actually driving the current proliferation of aquaculture certification programs? Of course there are underlying environmental and economic pressures that support the logic of certifi cation, and these are discussed below in Sections 3 and 4. Some non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have adopted prominent roles as catalysts, mounting successful campaigns to draw public attention to negative environmental, health and social consequences of some aquaculture systems. Yet these groups, on their own, are not suited to establishing certifi cation schemes because they lack the technical expertise and resources needed to deliver regular, reliable and independent assessments of aquaculture ventures.

Typically their campaigns are sporadic and, in the media attention they generate, important information is often lost among unsubstantiated or exaggerated claims. Although consumers are free to ignore messages from NGOs the same cannot be said of managers in the retail and food service sectors. The companies and brands they manage are highly sensitive to negative messages so they constantly strive to reduce vulnerability to external shocks, whatever the source. In addition, leading corporate players, rather than simply reacting to consumer concerns or NGO campaigns, actively encourage responsible and sustainable practices among their suppliers as part of their CSR (corporate social responsibility) agendas.

|Abstract
= 78 veces | PDF
= 52 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. (2000) Eco-labelling: legal, decent honest and truthful? Green Chemistry, Royal Society of Chemistry, February 2000, pp.19-21.

Anon. (2007a) Wegman, Bon Appétit adopt salmon standard. SeaFood Business, June 12, 2007. http://www.seafoodbusiness.com/archives.asp?ItemID=3071&pcid=196&cid=197&archive=yes

Anon. (2007b) Best Aquaculture Practices becoming a buyer’s mandate. SeaFood Business, June 15, 2007. http://www.seafoodbusiness.com/archives.asp?ItemID=3400&pcid=235&cid=236&archive=yes

Asche, F., Guttormsen, A.G. & Tveterås, R. (1999) Environmental problems, productivity and innovations in the Norwegian Salmon Aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management 3 (1), 19-29.

Asche, F. & Tveterås, S. (2006) Review of environmental issues in fi sh farming: empirical evidence from salmon farming. In: The Economics of Aquaculture with respect to Fisheries: Proceedings of the 95th EAAE Seminar, Civitavecchia (Rome), Italy 9-11 December 2005. Vitterbo, Italy. Available at www.unitus.it/EAAE_2nd_call/papers/4_Asche_Tveteras.pdf

Baghwati, J. (2004) In Defence of Globalization. Oxford University Press, 308 pp.

Boyd, C.E., Limsuwan, C. & Fegan, D. (2006) Working group recommends certifi cation revisions for shrimp farm clusters. Global Aquaculture Advocate 9 (4), 3-5.

Clay, J.W. (1996) Market potentials for redressing the environmental impact of wild captured and pond produced shrimp. World Wildlife Fund, Washington,

CONSENSUS (2006) Defi ning indicators for sustainable aquaculture in Europe. A multi-stakeholder workshop held in Ostende, Belgium, November 21-23, 2005.

CONSENSUS, European Aquaculture Society, 118 pp. www.euraquaculture.info/fi les/CONSENSUS_Workshop.pdf

Conway, G.R. (1985) Agroecosystem analysis. Agricultural Administration 20, 31-35.

Cornelissen, A.M.G. (2003) The two faces of sustainability. Fuzzy evaluation of sustainable development. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands, 183 pp.

Dominy, S. (2008) US organic aquaculture recommendations please no one. Aquafeed.com. 11/23/2008. http://www.aquafeed.com/read-article.php?id=2623

EC (2002) Final report of a mission carried out in Germany from 19 to 23 August 2002 in order to evaluate the relevant control systems in place, in the light of the recent fi ndings of Nitrofen in food and feeding stuffs. European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. DG(SANCO)/8686/2002 – MR fi nal, 22 pp.

Esty, D.C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T. & de Sherbinin, A. (2005) 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, 408 pp

FAO (1997) Review of the state of world aquaculture.

FAO Fisheries Circular. No. 886, Rev.1. FAO, Rome. 163pp.FAO (2005) Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of fi sh and fi shery products from marine capture fi sheries.

FAO, Rome, 90pp. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/a0116t/a0116t00.pdfFAO/NACA (2007) Aquaculturecertifi cation: a programme for implementing the recommendation of the committee on Fisheries Sub-Committee on Aquaculture. FAO/NACA, Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacifi c (NACA), Bangkok, Thailand. 18 pp. Available at www.enaca.org/modules/wfdownloads/singlefi le.php?cid=84&lid=787

Iizuka, M. (2006) Standards as a new platform of innovation and learning in the global economy: a case study of a natural resource in a catching-up country. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 24 pp. www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/events/ocs/viewpaper.php?id=198

Keeny, D.R. (1989) Toward a sustainable agriculture: need for clarifi cation of concepts and terminology. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 4, 101-105.

Keithly, W.R. Jr., Roberts, K.J. & Ward, J.M. (1992) Effects of shrimp aquaculture on the US market: an econometric analysis. In: Aquaculture Models and Economics (eds U. Hatch and H. Kinnucan), pp. 125-156. Westview Press, Colorado, USA.

Lee, D. & Connelly, J. (2006) Global Aquaculture Alliance on Best Aquaculture Practices: an industry prepares for sustainable growth. Sustainable Development Law and PolicyVII(1), 60-62.

Macfadyen, G. (2004) Policy Research – Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries. Trade Issues background paper: ethical/social/eco certifi cation, labeling and guidelines. Project PR 26109, July 2004. FAO, Rome, 21 pp. www.onefi sh.org/id/225570

Mathew, S. (2004) Sustainable Development and Social Well-being: which approach to the fi sh trade? Bridges Monthly Review 8 (4), 11-14.

Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J.H., et al. (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fi sh supplies. Nature 405, 1017-1024.

Phillips, B., Ward, T. & Chaffee, C. (2003) Eco-labelling in Fisheries. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. 196 pp.

Seerad (2003) A Strategic Framework for Scottish Aquaculture. Scottish Executive, 70 pp. Available at www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/47034/0014768.pdf

Tacon, A.G.J. & Brister, D.J. (2002) Organic Aquaculture, current status and future prospects. In: Organic agriculture, environment and food security, (eds N. El-H. Scialabba & C. Hattam) Environment and Natural Resources Series 4, FAO, Rome.www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y4137E/y4137e06.htm

UNEP (2005) The trade and environmental effects of ecolabels: assessment and response. United Nations Environment Program, 44 pp. Available at http://www.unep.ch/etb/publications/Ecolabelpap141005f.pdf

WCED (1987) Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

Wessels, C.R., Johnston, R.J., & Holger, D. (1999) Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: the infl uence of species, certifi er and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1084-1089.

Wessells, C.R, Cochrane, K., Deere, C., Wallis, P. &Willman, R. (2001) Product certifi cation and eco-labelling for fi sheries sustainability. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 422, FAO Rome, 83 pp.

Wolf, M. (2005) Why Globalization Works. Yale Nota Bene, 416 pp.

Downloads

Published

2009-10-20

How to Cite

Lee, D. (2009). Understanding aquaculture certification. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 22(3), 11. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324459