Genetic diversity in oocyte donors used in in vitro bovine embryo production programs in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v32n2a02Keywords:
allele frequencies, heterozygosity, inbreeding, microsatellite markers, oocyteAbstract
Background: Current reproductive management of bovine elite populations involves the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), aiming to obtain the greatest genetic gain. However, inadequate use of ARTs may lead to loss of genetic diversity in the offspring. Objective: To assess the genetic diversity in elite female cattle populations used in commercial in vitro embryo production. Methods: Using genetic and ecological approaches for the study of populations based on microsatellite markers, we assessed the genetic diversity between and within populations of cows used in commercial in vitro embryo production programs in Brazil. Results: Endogamy within populations varied from zero to 9.1%, while heterozygosity between populations (FST) was <0.05 in the different population interactions. AMOVA showed 1% variation between populations, 8% between individuals and 91% within individuals. The dimensionality reduction method utilized indicated a lack of structure in the populations analyzed, identifying two main clusters in the three populations. Conclusions: Low genetic diversity between cow populations associated with commercial programs of in vitro embryo production in Brazil was evidenced. Variable levels of endogamy within the populations were observed. Approaches of population genetics as well as ecological diversity can be implemented to more thoroughly estimate genetic diversity in livestock populations.
Downloads
References
Biscarini F, Nicolazzi E, Alessandra S, Boettcher P, Gandini G. Challenges and opportunities in genetic improvement of local livestock breeds. Front Genet 2015; 5:1-16.
Dassonneville R, Baur A, Fritz S, Boichard D, Ducrocq V. Inclusion of cow records in genomic evaluations and impact on bias due to preferential treatment. Genet Sel Evol 2012; 44(40):1-8.
Egito AA, Paiva SR, Albuquerque MS., et al. Microsatellite based genetic diversity and relationships among ten Creole and commercial cattle breeds raised in Brazil. BMC Genet 2007; 8(8).
Faria FJC, Filho AE V, Madalena FE, Josahkian LA. Pedigree analysis in the Brazilian Zebu breeds. J Anim Breed Genet 2009; 126(2):148-153.
Gaggiotti OE, Lange O, Rassmann K, Gliddon C. A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Mol Ecol 1999; 8(9):1513-1520.
Gautier M, Laloë D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Brandstaetter A. Insights into the Genetic History of French Cattle from Dense SNP Data on 47 Worldwide Breeds. PLoS One 2010; 5(9):1-11.
Greenbaum G, Templeton AR, Zarmi Y, Bar-David S. Allelic richness following population founding events - A stochastic modeling framework incorporating gene flow and genetic drift. PLoS One 2014; 9(12):1-23.
Holsinger KE, Weir BS. Fundamental concepts in genetics: Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST. Nat Publ Gr 2009; 10:639-650.
IETS. 2016 Statistics of embryo collection and transfer in domestic farm animals. IETS Data Retrieval Report. 2016.
Kale DS, Rank DN, Joshi CG, et al. Genetic diversity among Indian Gir, Deoni and Kankrej cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Indian J Biotechnol 2010; 9(2):126-130.
Kalinowski ST. HP-RARE 1.0: A computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 2005; 5(1):187-189.
Liu L, Zhang D, Liu H, Arendt C. Robust methods for population stratification in genome wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14(1):132.
Nei M. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann Hum Genet 1977; 41(2):225-233.
O’Brien AMP, Höller D, Boison SA, et al. Low levels of taurine introgression in the current Brazilian Nelore and Gir indicinecattle populations. Genet Sel Evol 2015; 47(31):1-7.
Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update.2012; 28(19):2537-2539.
Pedersen LD, Kargo M, Berg P, Voergaard J, Buch LH, Sørensen AC. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle breeding programmes: Sexed semen cannot replace multiple ovulation and embryo transfer as superior reproductive technology. J Anim Breed Genet 2012; 129(2):152-163.
Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O. Identifying Populations for Conservation on the Basis of Genetic Markers. Conserv Biol 2008; 12(4):844-855.
Pham LD, Do DN, Binh NT, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of Vietnamese indigenous cattle populations by microsatellites. Livest Sci 2013; 155(1):17-22.
Porras-Hurtado L, Ruiz Y, Santos C, Phillips C, Carracedo Àngel, Lareu M V. An overview of structure: Applications, parameter settings, and supporting software. Front Genet 2013; 4:1-13.
Porto-Neto LR, Sonstegard TS, Liu GE, et al. Genomic divergenceof zebu and taurine cattle identified through high-density SNP genotyping. BMC Genomics 2013; 14(876):1-12.
Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW, Hayes BJ. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93(11):5455-5466.
Santana ML, Pereira RJ, Bignardi AB, El Faro L, Tonhati H, Albuquerque LG. History, structure, and genetic diversity of Brazilian Gir cattle. Livest Sci 2014; 163(1):26-33.
SAS®, Statistical Analysis System. SAS/STAT User ́s Guide.Version 9.2. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Incorporation; 2009.
Sharma R, Maitra A, Singh PK, Tantia MS. Genetic diversity and relationship of cattle populations of East India: distinguishing lesser known cattle populations and established breeds based on STR markers. Springer plus 2013; 2(1):359.
Slatkin M. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann Rev Eco/ Syst 1985; 16:393-430.
Villalobos-Cortés A, Martínnez A, Vega-Pla JL, et al. Genetic relationships among five zebu breeds naturalized in america accessed with molecular markers. Ital J Anim Sci 2015; 14(2):158-162.
Wang Y. Genetic and Geographic Diversity of Gyr (Bos Indicus) Cattle in Brazil. 2015.Wright S. Systems of mating. I. The biometric relations between parent and offspring. Genetics 1921; 6:111-123.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors enable RCCP to reprint the material published in it.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions, and will allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.