Índices de selección y niveles independientes de descarte para dos características productivas y reproductivas en un hato holstein (Bos taurus)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324285Keywords:
open days, genetic parameters, genetic progress, milk productionAbstract
Summary
With the purpose to evaluate genetic selection by using indexes and independent culling levels (ICL) for productive and reproductive traits, 305-d milk yield (MY) and days open (DO), 1707 and 1206 records for MY and DO, respectively, were analyzed. By means of the MTDFREML program genetic parameters for heritability of 0.23 ± 0.065 and 0.09 ± 0.074 for MY and DO, respectively, and for repeatability of 0.34 ± 0.061 and 0.18 ± 0.054 for MY and DO, respectively, were estimated. Also the genetic, phenotypic and environmental correlations between MY and DO were estimated, resulting in values of 0.15 ± 0.32, 0.42 and 0.34, respectively. For the indexes and ICL elaboration, and the estimation of genetic progress, different relations between relative economic values were analyzed. The highest progress was found for DO:MY economic values at 1:3 ratio. In the same way, evaluations for different selection intensities were done, where the highest genetic progress was obtained by the used of the maximum selection intensity (selected fraction of 10%) for both cases. Although with both selection methods the achievement of simultaneous genetic progress for each trait was demonstrated, by estimating a comparative relationship between both genetic progresses, a 12.6% more genetic progress by each generation was found for Index than for ICL methods. Nevertheless, despite being the Index a better method for selection of the best animals it requires a more precise estimation of correlations between traits, a process that was not feasible performed in the present study. Thereafter, ICL is proposed as the more convenient for that type of selection program.
Downloads
References
Arnold JW, Bertrand JK, Benyshek LL, Comerford JW, Kiser TE. Selection for low birth weight and high yearling weight in Angus beef cattle. Livest Prod Sci 1990; 25:31-41 [ [Abstract] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(90)90039-9
Bath DL, Dickinson NF, Tucker A, Appleman D. Ganado lechero principios, practicas, problemas y beneficios. 2nded. México: Nueva Editorial Interamericana; 1982.
Berger PJ,Shanks RD, Freeman AE, LabenRC. Genetic aspects of milk yield and reproductive performance. J Dairy Sci 1981; 64:114-122. [Pdf] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82535-0
Boldman KG. A manual for use of MTDFREML, a set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances. USDA, Agricultural Research Service; 1993.
Campos JC. Melhoramento genético aplicado à producao animal. Belo Horizonte: FEP-MVZ; 1999.
Campos MS, Wilcox CJ, Becerril CM, DizA. Genetic parameters for yield and reproductive traits of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Florida. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77:867-873. [Pdf] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77021-1
Cardellino R, Rovira J. Mejoramiento genético animal. Buenos Aires: Hemisferio Sur; 1987.
Cerón-Rojas J, Sahagún-Castellanos J. Un índice de selección basado en componentes principales. Agrociencia 2005; 39:667-677. [Pdf]
Córdova A, Pérez J. Relación reproducción-producción en vacas Holstein. Revista electrónica de veterinaria 2005; [fecha de acceso: enero 20 de 2008] URL: http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n020205/020537.pdf
Correa HJ. Relación producción-reproducción en hatos de alto potencial genético y propuestas nutricionales para mejorarla. Boletín Técnico de la Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, 15 p. Medellín, 2001.
Dematawewa CMB, Berger PJ. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in holsteins. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81:2700-2709. [Pdf] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75827-8
Echeverri J, Salazar V, Múnera D. El cruzamiento como estrategia para mejorar la rentabilidad de hatos lecheros. Rev Lasallista Inv 2006; 3:48:52. [Pdf]
Espinal TL. Geografía ecológica del departamento de Antioquia: Zonas de vida, formaciones vegetales del departamento de Antioquia. Rev Fac Nal Agr Medellín 1985; 38:80.
Galvis R, Múnera E, Marín A. Relación entre el mérito genético para la producción de leche y el desempeño metabólico y reproductivo en la vaca de alta producción. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2005; 18:228-238. [Pdf]
Gonzáles O, Pérez M,Alenda R. Parámetros genéticos de losGonzáles O, Pérez M, Alenda R. Parámetros genéticos de los caracteres de fertilidad en el vacuno de leche 2003; [fecha de acceso: enero 20 de 2008] URL: http:// www.dcam.upv.es/acteon/CONGRESOS/AIDA2003/gonzalez.pdf
Hermás SA, Young CW, RustJW. Genetic relationships and additive genetic variation of productive and reproductive traits in Guernsey dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1987; 70:1252-1257. [Pdf] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80138-8
Jones WP, Hansen LB, Chester-Jones H. Response of health care to selection for milk yield of dairy cattle. J Anim Sci 1994; 77:3137:3152. [Pdf] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77257-X
Kadarmideen HN, Thompson R, Simm G. Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. J Anim Sci 2000; 71:411-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055338
MacNeil MD, Urick JJ, Snelling WM. Comparison of selection by independent culling levels for below-average birth weight and high yearling weight with mass selection for high yearling weight in line 1 Hereford cattle. J Anim Sci 1998; 76:458-467. [Pdf] DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.762458x
Manjarres JC. Adaptación del programa modelo animal para calcular valores genéticos en el centro Paysandú. Trabajo de grado. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 1998. 89p.
Montoya C. Estimación del valor genético para producción de leche a través de un modelo lineal mixto con repetibilidad (Modelo Animal). Trabajo de investigación. Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 1985. 71 p.
Montoya C. Evaluación genética de reproductores lecheros en Antioquia a través del mejor predictor lineal insesgado. Trabajo de investigación. Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 1996. 89 p.
Pereira JCC. Estudo da relaçao genética entre caracteristicas produtivas e reprodutivas de um rebanho nativo da raca Caracu. Belo Horizonte: UFMG-Escola de Veterinária; 1993.
Romero J, Sahagún J, Ramírez G, Rendón G. Índice de selección genotípica apoyado en marcadores moleculares ligados. Agrociencia 2004; 38:293-303. [Pdf]
Stonaker H. Genética para el mejoramiento animal. México: Centro regional de ayuda técnica; 1977.
Valencia M, Ruíz F, Montaldo H, Trejo B, Keown J, et al. Estimación de factores de corrección edad-mes de parto para producción de leche en ganado holstein en México. Tec Pecu Mex 2000; 38:9-18. [Pdf]
Wattiaux MA. La elección de un toro 2000; [fecha de acceso: marzo de 2002] URL:http://www.babcock.cais.wisc.ed u
Willham RL, Conley GO. La genética de las poblaciones aplicada al mejoramiento animal. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 1969. 148p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors enable RCCP to reprint the material published in it.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions, and will allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.