The structure of transcendental deduction B

Authors

  • Javier Antonio Gutiérrez Cervantes Universidad de Antioquia

Keywords:

Immanuel Kant, Critique of pure reason, transcendental philosophy, theory of knowledge, modern philosophy

Abstract

the paper aims to explore two possible interpretations of the argumentative structure of Kant’s
transcendental deduction of categories, according to the 1787 edition (B). First, it is exposed both
interpretations, out of their most important defenders —Henry Allison and Dieter Heinrich—. Later,
possibilities and difficulties implied by such interpretations are clarified and it is suggested that the proof's
structure is only one and not a two different proofs

|Abstract
= 199 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 2031 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Javier Antonio Gutiérrez Cervantes, Universidad de Antioquia

Philosophy · Institute of Philosophy

References

Allison, Henry E., Idealism and freedom (reflections on the B-Deduction), University of California, San Diego, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

____________, “Apercepción y analiticidad en la deducción B”, en: Dulce María Granja (coord.), Kant: de la Crítica a la filosofía de la religión, Barcelona, Anthropos, 1994.

Henrich, Dieter, “La estructura de la prueba en la deducción trascendental de Kant”, en: Dulce María Granja (coord.), Kant: de la Crítica a la filosofía de la religión, Barcelona, Anthropos, 1994.

Kant, Immanuel, Crítica de la Razón Pura, (Pedro Ribas, tr.), Madrid, Alfaguara, 1998.

____________, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Werkausgabe, Band III, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Published

2014-02-04

How to Cite

Gutiérrez Cervantes, J. A. (2014). The structure of transcendental deduction B. Versiones. Philosophy’s Journal, (4), 9–18. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/versiones/article/view/18341

Issue

Section

In memoriam Javier Antonio Gutiérrez Cervantes