Auditoría de conocimiento. Análisis de dominio de las bases de datos SCOPUS y WoK

María Virginia González Guitián; María Rosa De Zayas Pérez

doi:10.17533/udea.rib.13331

Authors

María Virginia González Guitián Universidad de Holguín “Óscar Lucero Moya”
María Rosa De Zayas Pérez universidad de holguín “óscar lucero moya”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.13331

Keywords:

domain analysis, information visualization, knowledge audit

Abstract

This an approach to the visualization of the domain knowledge audits, based on an analysis of the scientific production of the database Scopus and Wok between the years 1994-2010. Productivity was studied for years, most productive authors, publications, levels of collaboration between authors of this domain were used and most cited themes. Computer tools such as the Excel, ToolInf and Ucinet. In the studied period were published: 63 articles and 30 procedings. 93 works under the signature of 232 authors, proceeding were published. The most productive magazine was Lecture Notes in Computer Science, and authors with a major contribution to this topic were Wing-Bun Lee, Chi Fai Cheung, Elissaveta Gourova and Baimin M. Suo. Finally the results are depicted in different graphs and maps for viewing.

|Abstract

= 136 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 71 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Virginia González Guitián, Universidad de Holguín “Óscar Lucero Moya”

Graduate in Scientific-Technical Information and Librarianship, Master in Information Sciences, Assistant Professor. Holguín University "Óscar Lucero Moya". Department of Journalism and Social Communication.

María Rosa De Zayas Pérez, universidad de holguín “óscar lucero moya”

Degree in Physics-Mathematics, Master in Business Intelligence. Assistant teacher. Information and Technological Management Center. IDICT-Holguín. Information Management Department Holguín, Cuba

References

DEBENHAM, John & CLARK, Jeff. The knowledge audit. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Journal, 11 (3): 201-211, 1994.

GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation indexes in sociological and historical research. American Documentation, 14 (4): 289-

, 1963.

GRIFFITH, Belver C. [et al.]. The structure of scientific literatures, II: toward a macro and microestructure for

science. Science Studies, 4: 339-365, 1974.

HANDZIC, Meliha, LAGUMDZIJA, Amila, & CELJO, Amer. Auditing knowledge management practices:

model and application. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6 (1): 90-99, 2008.

HJORLAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information science eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative.

Journal of Documentation, 58 (4): 422462, 2002.

HJORLAND, Birger & ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain analysis.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (6): 400-425, 1995.

HYLTON, Anne. A KM initiative is unlikely to succeed without a knowledge audit [Online]. Bruselas: Knowledge Board, 2002. [Fecha de consulta: 15 February 2009] Disponible en: http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/KM_Initiative_Unlikely_to_

Succeed_Without_a_K_Audit.pdf

IAZZOLINO, Gianpaolo & PIETRANTONIO, Rinaldo. An innovative knowledge audit methodology: some first results from an ongoing research in Southern Italy. In: Accettato alla KMAP international Conference on knowledge management [Online]. University of New Zealand, 2005. [Fecha de consulta: 28 may 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.knowledgeboard.com/ download/2639/-iazz-pietr-Innovative-KA-Meth.pdf