Detección de los polimorfismos de 4 STRS en la región Bola y análisis de su efecto sobre Mastitis clínica Bovina en la raza Holstein
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329420Palabras clave:
mastitis, BM1818, CYP21, TAMLS113.3, UWCAIResumen
En este trabajo se determinó la existencia de asociaciones no espureas entre los polimorfismos de cuatro STRs de la región BoLA (BM1818, CYP21, TALMS113.2 y UWCA1) y la susceptibilidad a mastitis clínica en una población Holstein del departamento de Antioquia, Colombia. La población no se encontró en equilibrio de Hardy-Weinberg para los locus CYP21, TAMLS113.3 y UWCA1. El alelo más frecuente para BM1818 fue 262 (0,527), para TAMLS113.3 fue 162 (0,285), para CYP21 fue 194 (0,269) y para UWCA1 fue 110 (0,317), siendo éste último el más polimórfico de los 4 STRs analizados. Los alelos TAMLS113.3*170 y UWCA1*110, 112 y 116 mostraron efecto significativo (p < 0,05) con la susceptibilidad a mastitis clínica bovina en la población analizada.
Descargas
Citas
Aarestrup F, Jensen N, Ostergard H. 1995. Analysis ofassociations between major histocompatibilitycomplex (BoLA) class I haplotypes and subclinicalmastitis of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science,78:1684-1692.
Amorena B, Stone WH. 1978. Serologically defined SDlocus in cattle. Science, 201:159-160.
Andersson L, Davies CJ. 1994. The major histocom-patibility complex. Pp. 37-57. En: Goddeeris BML,Morrison WI (eds.). Cell-mediated Immunity inruminants. CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida, E. U. A.
Barajas R, Jaramillo A, Vel·squez O. 1999. Factores deriesgo asociados a infecciones sublclÌnicas produci-das por biotopos humano y bovino deStaphylococcus aureus en la gl·ndula mamaria devacas en lactancia. Revista de Veterinaria y Zootec-nia de Caldas, 11:30-33.
Barendse W, Armitage SM, Kossarek LM, Shalom A,Kirkpatrick BW, Ryan AM, Clayto D, Li L, NeibergsHL, Zhang N, Grosse WM, Weiss J, Creighton P,McCarthy F, Ron M, Teale A, Fries R, McGraw RA,Moore SS, Georges M, Soller M, Womack JE. 1994.A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome. NatureGenetics, 6:227-235.
Batra TR, Lee AJ, Gavora JS, Stear MJ. 1989. Class Ialleles of the bovine major histocompatibility systemand their association with economic traits. Journalof Dairy Science, 72:2115-2124.
Beever Je, Da Y, Green CA, Russ I, Park C, Heyen DW,Everst RE, Fisher SR, Overton KM, Teale AJ, KempsSJ, Hines HG, Guerin G, Lewin HA. 1996. A malelinkage map of the catlle (Bos taurus) genome.Journal Heredity, 87: 261-271.
Bernoco D, Lewin HA, Andersson L. 1991. Joint report ofthe fourth international bovine lymphocyte antigen(BoLA). Genetics, 22:477-496.
Berryere TG, Muggli-Cockett N, Robins JW, SchmutzSM. 1994. Molecular studies of DRB relative toStaphylococcus aureus mastitis. Proceedings of the5th World Congress on Genetic Applied to LivestockProduction of Guelph Canada, 21:187-190.
Bishop MD, Kappes SM, Keele JW, Stone RT, SundenSLF, Hawkins GA, Solinas-Toldo S, Fries R, GroszMD, Yoo J, Beattie CW. 1994. A genetic linkage mapfor cattle. Genetics, 136:619-639.
Brand A, Gaastra W, Lam JGM, Lipman LJ, SchukkenYW. 1996. Epidemiological characteristic ofbovine clinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcusaureus on Escherichia coli studied by DNAfingerprinter. American Journal of VeterinarianResearch, 57:38-42.
Chang GWM, Kam PCA. 1999. The physiological andpharmacological roles of cytochrome P450isoenzimes. Anaesthesia, 54:42-50.
Creighton PA, Eggen A, Fries R, Jordan SA, Hetzel J,Cunningham EP, Humphries P. 1992. Mapping ofbovine markers CYP21, PRL, and BoLA DRBP1 bygenetic linkage analysis in reference pedigrees.Genomics, 14:526-529.
Crist W, Harmon R, Oíleary J, McAllister J. 1997.Mastitis and its control. CES University of KentuckyHomepage. <http://www.ca.uky.edu/agc/pubs/asc/asc140/asc140.pdf>. Fecha de consulta: 25 noviem-bre de 2005.
Davies CJ, Joosten I, Berneco D, Arriens J, Ceriotti G,Ellis S, Hensen EJ, Hines HC, Horin P. 1994.Polymorphism of bovine MHC class II genes. Jointreport of the fifth international bovine lymphocyteantigen (BoLA) Workshop. Interlaken, Switzerland.1 August 1992. European Journal of Immunoge-netics, 21(4):259-289.
DeRosa D, Shafer WK, Sordillo L. 1997. Immunobiologyof the mamary gland. Journal of Dairy Science,80:1851-1865.
Dohoo IR, Meek AH. 1982. Somatic cell counts in bovinemilk. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 23:119-125.
Eberhart RJ, Harmon RJ, Jasper DE, Natzke RP,Nickerson SC, Reneau JK, Row EH, Smith KL,Spencer SB. 1987. Current concepts of bovinemastitis. 3rd Ed. National Mastitis Council. Arlington(VA), E. U. A.
Gallagher DS, Newkirk H, Taylor JF, Burzlaff JD, DaviesSK, Skow LC. 2001. Physical localization and orderof genes in the class I region of the bovine MHC.Animal Genetics, 32:235-239.
Glass EJ, Oliver RA, Spooner RL. 1990. Variation in T-Cellresponses to ovalbumin in cattle: evidence for genecontrol. Animal Genetics, 21:15-28.
Goy J, Honeycutt D. 1994. Dinucleotide repeatpolymorphism near a bovine MHC class I sequence.Animal Genetics, 25:290.
Guo SW, Thompson EA. 1992. Performing the exact test ofHardy-Weinberg proportion of multiple alleles.Biometrics, 48:361-372.
Hoeschele I, Meinert TR. 1990. Association of geneticdefects with yield and type traits. Journal of DairyScience, 73:2503-2515.
Ihara N, Mizoshita K, Takeda H, Sugimoto M, MizoguchiY, Hirano T, Itoh T, Watanabe T, Reed K, SnellingW, Kapees S, Beattie C, Bennett G, Sugimoto Y. 2004.A comprensive genetic map of the cattle genomebased on 3.802 microsatellites. Genome Research,14:1987-1998.
Kappes SM, Keele JW, Stone RT, McGraw RA, SonstegardTS, Smith TP, Lopez-Corrales NL, Beattie CW. 1997.A second generation linkage map of bovine genome.Genome Research, 7:235-249.
Kelm SC, Detilleux JC, Freeman AE. 1997. Geneticassociation between parameters of innate immunityand measures of mastitis in periparturient Holsteincattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 80:1767-1775.
Leigh JA. 1999. Streptococcus uberis: a permanent barrierto the control of bovine Mastitis. The VeterinaryJournal, 157:225-238.
Lewin HA. 1989. Disease resistance and immune responsegenes in cattle: Strategies for their detection andevidence of their existence. Journal of Dairy Science,72(5):1334-1348.
Lie O, Solbu H. 1994. Possible association of antibodyresponses human serum albumin and (T, G)-A-L withthe bovine major histocompatibility complex (BoLA).Veterinary Inmunology and Inmunopathology,11:333-350.
Lunden A, Sigurdardottir S, Edfors-Lilja I, Danell B,Andersson L. 1990. The relationship between bovine major histocompatibility complex class IIpolymorphism and disease studied by use of bullbreeding values. Animal Genetics, 21:221-232.
Lytton SD, Berg U, Nemeth A, Ingelman-Sundbe M. 2002.Autoantibodies against cytochrome P450 in childrentreated with immunosuppressive drugs. ClinicalExperimental Immunobiology, 127:293-302.
McShane RD, Gallagher DS Jr, Newkirk H, Taylor JF,Burzlaff JD, Davis SK, Skow LC. 2001. Physicallocalization and order of genes in the class I regionof the bovine MHC. Animal Genetics, 32(5):235-239.
Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. 1988. A simple saltingout procedure for extracting DNA from humannucleated cells. Nucleic Acid Research, 16:1215.
Oddgeirsson O, Simpson SP, Morgan ALG, Ross DS,Spooner RL. 1988. Relationship between the bovinemajor histocompatibility complex (BoLA) erythrocytemarkers and susceptibility to mastitis. AnimalGenetics, 19:11-16.
Opdebeeck JP. 1982. Mammary gland immunity. JournalAmerican Veterinarian Medical Association,181:1061-1065.
Powell RL, Wiggans GR, Sieber M. 1997. Consistency ofinternational genetic evaluations of Holstein bulls.Journal of Dairy Science, 80:2177-2183.
Russell G. 1997. BoLA. Roslin Institute Homepage. <http://www.ri.bbsrc.ac.uk/bola/drb3ms>. Fecha de consul-ta: 25 de noviembre de 2005.SAS Institute. 1989. Users guide. Version 6. Cuarta edi-ciÛn. Cary (North Carolina), E. U. A.
Schalm OW, Carrol EJ, Jain NC. 1971. Bovine mastitis.Lea y Febiger Pub. Filadelfia (MA), E. U. A.
Sharif S, Mallard BA, Wilkie BN, Sargeant JM, ScottHM, Dekkers JCM, Leslie KE. 1998. Associationsof the bovine major histocompatibility complex DRB3(BoLA-DRB3) alleles with occurrence of disease andsomatic cell score in Canadian dairy cattle. AnimalGenetics, 29:185-193.
Skow LC, Honeycutt D, Goy J. 1994. Dinucleotide repeatpolymorphism near a bovine MHC class I sequence.Animal Genetics, 24:290.
Slate J, Coltman DW, Goodman SJ, MacLean I, PembertonJM, Williams JL. 1998. Bovine microsatellite lociare highly conserved in red deer (Cervus elephus),sika deer (Cervus nippon) and Soay sheep (Ovisaries). Animal Genetics, 29(4):307-315.
Spooner RL, Morgan ALG, Sales D, Simpson SP, Solbu H,Lie O. 1988. MHC association with mastitis. AnimalGenetics, 19-57.
Statkin M, Excoffier L. 1996. Testing for linkagedisequilibrium in genotypic data using the EMalgorithm. Heredity, 76:377-383.
Sun HS, Hart GL, Kirkpatrick BW. 1993. A polymorphicmicrosatellite (UWCA1) detected on bovinechromosome 23. Animal Genetics, 24:142.
Uribe HA, Kennedy BW, Martin SW. Kelton DF. 1995.Genetic parameters for common health disorders ofHolstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 78:421-430.
Usha AP, Simpson SO, Williams JL. 1995. Probability ofrandom sire exclusion using microsatellite markers forparentage verification. Animal Genetics, 26:155-161.
Watts JL, Owens WE. 1988. Evaluation of the RapidMastitis Test (RMT) for identification of Staphylo-coccus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae isolatedfrom bovine intramammary infections. Journal ofClinical Microbiology, 26:672-674.
Weimann C, Kraus M, Gauly M, Erhardt G. 2003.Differences in recombination rates on chromosome23 between German Angus and German Simmentaland breed specific linkage mapping. AnimalGenetics, 34(3):229-231.
Weir C, Cockerham R. 1984. Covariances of relativesstemming from a population undergoing mixed selfand random mating. Biometrics, 40:157-64.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Actualidades Biológicas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores autorizan de forma exclusiva, a la revista Actualidades Biológicas a editar y publicar el manuscrito sometido en caso de ser recomendada y aceptada su publicación, sin que esto represente costo alguno para la Revista o para la Universidad de Antioquia.
Todas las ideas y opiniones contenidas en los artículos son de entera responsabilidad de los autores. El contenido total de los números o suplementos de la revista, está protegido bajo Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional, por lo que no pueden ser empleados para usos comerciales, pero sí para fines educativos. Sin embargo, por favor, mencionar como fuente a la revista Actualidades Biológicas y enviar una copia de la publicación en que fue reproducido el contenido.