The only way to learn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12736Keywords:
Logic, Hume, Popper, Darwin, Evolutionist Epistemology, Skepticism, Empirism, experienceAbstract
It is often held that, although Hume was right about the logical invalidity of induction, nonetheless we do learn by induction. Logically speaking our theories may be hypotheses, or conjectures, but psychologically they are generalizations that are suggested by, and even grounded in, our experience. Hume himself believed this. In opposition to this commonsense view of how we learn, Karl Popper maintained that induction is as psychologically bankrupt as it is logically bankrupt. Our knowledge is not based on experience. It consists of unsubstantiated conjectures, which experience may be called upon to refute. The growth of knowledge is not a process of instruction by the environment, but a Darwinian process of ‘blind variation and selective retention’. This topic can of course be treated empirically — though not by me. In this lecture I wish to examine some of Popper’s logical arguments against the possibility of induction as the way we learn, and to the conclusion that the method of trial and error is unavoidable. I shall, in particular, look at his claim that there is close kinship between Darwinism, both organic and philosophical, and what is called ‘situational logic’. It is my purpose to defend the view that, although highly indeterministic, evolutionary factors play a greater role in intellectual and cultural growth than it is now fashionable to admit. Evolution is not exclusively a matter of survival and reproduction.
Downloads
References
JARVIE, I. C., MILFORD, K. M., & MILLER, D. W. (eds.). Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment Science. Volumen 3. Aldershot & Burlington VT, Ashgate, 2006.
MILLER, D. W. Critical Rationalism. A Restatement and Defence. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago & La Salle IL, 1994.
____________. How Little Uniformity Need an Inductive Inference Presupose? En: Jarvie, I. C. & Laor, N. (eds.). Critical Rationalism, Meaphysics & Science. Essays for Joseph Agassi. Vol 1. Kluwer Academic Piblishers, Dordrecht, 1995 (reprinted with additions as Chapter 8 of Miller, D. Out of Error. Aldershot & Burlington VT, Ashgate, 2006), pp. 143-148).
____________. Out of Error. Aldershot & Burlington VT, Ashgate, 2006.
____________. Darwinism is the Application of Situational Logic to the State of Ignorance. En: Jarvie I. C., Milford K. M., & Miller D. W. (eds.). Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment Science. Volumen 3. Aldershot & Burlington VT, Ashgate, 2006, pp. 155-162.
MUNZ, P. Philosophical Darwinism. On the Origin of Knowledge by Means of Natural Selection. Routledge, London, 1993.
____________ . Popper’s Darwinism. En: Jarvie I. C., Milford K. M., & Miller D. W. (eds.). Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment Science. Volumen 3. Aldershot & Burlington VT, Ashgate, 2006, pp. 131–141.
O’HEAR, A. Beyond Evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
POPPER, K. R. The Poverty of Historicism III. Economica 12 (46), mayo de 1945, pp. 69-89. Reimpresión como libro. The Poverty of Historicism. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Londres, 1957. Hay traducción española de Pedro Schwartz: La miseria del historicismo. Taurus, Madrid, 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2549898
____________. Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Londres, 1963 (5a edición 1989). Hay traducción española de Néstor Migues: Conjeturas y refutaciones. Paidós, Barcelona & Buenos Aires, 1967.
____________. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972 (2a edición 1979). Hay traducción española de Carlos Solís Santos: Conocimiento objetivo. Tecnos, Madrid, 1974.
____________. Intellectual Autobiography. En: Schilpp, P. A. (comp.). The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Open Court Publishing Company, La Salle IL, 1974, pp. 3-181. Se reimprimió como libro: Unended Quest. Fontana, Londres, 1976. Hay traducción española de Carmen García Trevijano: Búsqueda sin término. Tecnos, Madrid, 1977.
___________.Quantum Theory & the Schismin Phyisics. Vol 3 of Post script to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, 1982.
____________. Realism and the Aim of Science. Vol 1 of Postscript to The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, Londres, 1983. Hay traducción española de Marta Sansigre Vidal: Realismo y el objetivo de la ciencia. Tecnos, Madrid, 1985.
____________. A World of Propensities. Thoemmes Press, Bristol, 1990.
____________. Knowledge and the Body–Mind Problem. Routledge, Londres, 1994. Hay traducción española de Olga Domínguez Scheidereiter: El cuerpo y la mente. Paidós, Barcelona, 1997.
SHAFER, G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976.
WATKINS, J. W. N. Imperfect Rationality. En: Borges, R. & Ciof, F.(comp.). Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge & otras ciudades, 1970, pp. 167-217.
____________. Popper and Darwinism. En: O’ Hear, A.(comp.).KarlPopper: Philosophy and Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge & otras ciudades, 1995, pp. 191-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563751.011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2007 David Miller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
