Philosophical Letters: Friendship and Simplicity

Authors

  • Andrea Lozano Vásquez Universidad de Los Andes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.16653

Keywords:

Epistle, dialogue, Seneca, Epicurus, Socrates.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show why and how the simple and friendly tone of the letter makes the learning and internalization of philosophical doctrines possible. First, it will show that the real Socrates and Plato’s character are a precedent for this way of philosophizing. And second, it will characterize the letter as ‘half of a dialog’, in terms of the attention and the peculiarities of the participants, the plain and conversational style and filial relationship between the fictional partners.

|Abstract
= 344 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 283 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andrea Lozano Vásquez, Universidad de Los Andes

Departamento de Humanidades y Literatura
Facultad de Artes y Humanidades
Bogotá, Colombia
E-mail: a.lozano72@uniandes.edu.co

References

ARRIGHETTI, G. (1973) Epicuro. Opere, Torino: Einaudi.

BIGNONE, E. (1920) Opere, frammente, testimonianze, Bari.

DERRIDA, J. (1986) La tarjeta postal: De Sócrates a Freud y más allá, Trad. Tomás Segovia, México: Siglo XXI.

DIOGENES LAERTIUS. (1966) Diogenis Laertii vitae philosophorum, 2 vols. Long, H. S. (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

DIOGENES LAERCIO. (2010) Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, Trad. L.-A. Bredlow, Zamora: Lucina.

EPICURO. (1973) Opere, Arrighetti, G. (Ed). Turin: Einaudi.

FOOT, Ph. (1978) Virtues and Vices, Oxford: Blackwell.

FOUCAULT, M. (1990) Tecnologías del yo, Paidós: Barcelona.

GIBSON, R. & MORRISON, A. D. (2007) “Introduction: What is a Letter?”, en: Ancient Letters. Classical & Late Antique Epistolography, Morello, Ruth & Morrison, A.D (Eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203956.003.0001

GONZÁLEZ, C. (2012) “Elocuencia y persuasión: la retórica estoica y su crítica en Cicerón”, en: Boulê. Ensayos en filosofía política y del discurso en la Antigüedad. Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes.

HADOT, P. (1998) ¿Qué es la filosofía antigua? México: F.C.E.

INWOOD, B. (2007) “The Importance of Form in Seneca’s Philosophical Letters”, en: Ancient Letters. Classical & Late Antique Epistolography. Morello, Ruth & Morrison, A.D (Eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203956.003.0006

MACINTYRE, A. (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theology (2a Edition), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

MAURACH, G. (1970) Der Bau von Senecas Epistulae Morales, Heidelberg.

MURPHY, J. (1986) “Ars dictaminis: El arte epistolar”, en: La retórica de la Edad Media, México: F.C.E.

NEHAMAS, A. (1998) The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault, Berkeley: University of California Press.

NUSSBAUM, M. (2003) La terapia del deseo. Teoría y práctica en la ética helenística, Trad. Miguel Candel, Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.

PLATÓN. (1968) “Laches”, en: Platonis opera, vol. 3, Burnet, J. (Ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

PLATÓN. (1985) “Laques”, en: Diálogos 1. Trad. C. García Gual, Madrid: Gredos.

SÉNECA. (1965) Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium, vols. 1-2, Reynolds, L. D. (Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00169611

SÉNECA. (1977) Cartas a Lucilio, Trad. J. M. Gallegos Rocafull, México: S.E.P.

TRAPP, Michael. (2003) Greek and Latin Letters. An Anthology with Translation. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2013-01-13

How to Cite

Lozano Vásquez, A. (2013). Philosophical Letters: Friendship and Simplicity. Estudios De Filosofía, (47), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.16653

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles

Categories