Husserl's Phenomenology and Scientific Positivism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.335782Keywords:
scientific positivism, meaning, technic, technologyAbstract
Edmund Husserl criticizes scientific positivism because it reduces the meaning of the world of life, as if this world consisted in a set of instrumentally manipulatable objects, while hiding a subjectivity operative at the levels of both science and pre-scientific experience. The return to the world of life (Lebenswelt) as a universal context of meanings and an inexhaustible source of resources to validate the pretenses of truth, normativeness and truthfulness of the subject, allows phenomenology to genetically reconstruct the meaning of science, technic and technology as an ethically and responsibly determinable human activity.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 1999 Estudios de Filosofía
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
