Counterrevolution and Revolt, fifty Years later. Kant, Marx, and the Relevance of Herbert Marcuse’s aesthetic Dimension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.352420Keywords:
Immanuel Kant, Karl Marx, Herbert Marcuse, aesthetics, political ecology, social philosophy, critical theoryAbstract
Recently, Critical Theory has been revisited due to the relevance of its critique of contemporary forms of alienation. This critique allows the unveiling of structural ele- ments of contemporary ways of life, offering an accurate analysis of the material and subjective causes of the current environmental crisis. An example of this contribution is Herbert Marcuse’s book Counterrevolution and Revolt, published in 1972. This article addresses the relationship between aesthetics and political ecology established in the main theses of Marcuse’s book. The objective is to present how Marcuse employs the German philosophical tradition, more specifically elements of Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment and Marx’s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, to constitute a conceptual project of emancipation based on what he calls the aesthetic dimension. The article concludes by claiming that Marcuse’s critics and formulation entail a double requirement in which the field of Aesthetics has a central role.
Downloads
References
Adorno, T. W. (1970). Das Naturschöne. In Ästhetische Theorie (pp. 97–121), Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7. Suhrkamp.
Adorno, T. W. (1970/2002) Aesthetic Theory (R. Hullot-Kentor, Trans.). Continuum.
Alford, C. F. (1985). Science and the Revenge of Nature. Marcuse and Habermas. University
Presses of Florida.
Assoun, P.-L. & Raulet, G. (1978). Marxisme e théorie critique. Payot.
Baumgarten, A. (1750/2007). Ästhetik (Bd. 1). Felix Meiner.
Bäumler, A. (1923/1967). Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts. Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Bird-Pollan, S. (2013). Critiques of Judgement. A Kantian Reading of Marcuse. Radical Philosophy Review, 16(1), 99–107. http://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev201316112
Bronner, S. (1994). The Anthropological Break: Herbert Marcuse and the Radical Imagination. In Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists (pp. 237–259). Blackwell.
Bundschuh, S. (1992). “Und weil der Mensch ein Mensch ist...” Anthropologische Aspekte der Sozialphilosophie Herbert Marcuses. zu Klampen.
Charbonnier, P. (2020). Abondance et liberté. Une histoire environnementale des idées politiques. La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.charb.2020.01
Delanty, G. & Harris, N. (2021). Critical Theory and the question of Technology: The Frankfurt School revisited. Thesis Eleven, 166(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513621100
Feenberg, A. (2005). Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of history. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203489000
Feuerbach, L. (1841/2006). Das Wesen des Christentums. In Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 5. Akademie Verlag.
Feuerbach, L. (1989). The Essence of Christianity (G. Elliot, Trans.). Prometheus.
Fischbach, F. (2007). Présentation. In Manuscrits économico-philosophiques de 1844 (pp. 7–51). Vrin.
Fourel, C. & Ruault, C. (2022). “Écologie et révolution”, pacifier l’existence. André Gorz/ Herbert Marcuse: un dialogue critique. Les petites mains. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec. foure.2023.01.0201
Freud, S. (1920/1940). Jenseits des Lustprinzips. In Gesammelte Werke (pp. 1–69), Bd. 13, 5th ed. Imago.
Ginsborg, H. (2006). Kant’s Biological Teleology and its Philosophical Significance. In G. Bird (Ed.), A Companion to Kant (pp. 455–469). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996287.ch30
Habermas, J. (1968). Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’. In Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’ (pp. 48–103). Suhrkamp. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01247043
Habermas, J. et al. (Eds.) (1978). Gespräche mit Herbert Marcuse. Suhrkamp.
Horkheimer, M. (1987). Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 2, “Philosophische Frühschriften 1922–1932”. Hrsg. Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. S. Fischer.
Jay, M. (1973). The Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute
of Social Research, 1923–1950. University of California Press.
Jay, M. (1982). Anamnestic Totalization: Reflections on Marcuse’s Theory of Remembrance. Theory and Society, 11(1), 1–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657283
Kangussu, I. (2008). Leis da liberdade. A relação entre estética e política na obra de Herbert Marcuse. Loyola.
Kangussu, I., Kovacevic, F., Lamas, A. (2017). Mic Check! The New Sensibility Speaks. In A. Lamas, T. Wolfson, P. Funke (Eds.), The Great Refusal: Herbert Marcuse and Contemporary Social Movements (pp. 132–156). Temple University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvrdf2df.12
Kant, I. (1790/1908). Kritik der Urtheilskraft. In Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. V. Georg Reimer.
Kant, I. (2008). Critique of the Power of Judgement (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Katz, B. (1982). Herbert Marcuse and the Art of Liberation. Verso.
Kellner, D. (1984). Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism. MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17583-3
Khurana, T. (2022). Gattungswesen. Zur Sozialität der menschlichen Lebensform. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 70(3), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2022-0023
Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J.-B. (1967). Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Presses Universitaires de France.
Lebrun, G. (1970), Kant et la fin de la métaphysique. Armand Colin.
Loureiro, I. (2003). Le marxisme écologique de Herbert Marcuse: il faut changer le sens du progrès. In M. Löwy & J.-M. Harribey (dir.), Capital contre nature (pp. 155-164). Presses Universitaires de France.
Lukács, G. (1972). Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins. In Werke, Bd. 13. Luchterhand. (Original work published in 1972)
Lukes, T. J. (1985). The Flight Into Inwardness. An Exposition and Critique of Herbert Marcuse’s Theory of Liberative Aesthetics. Associated University Presses.
Marcuse, H. (1932/1978). Neue Quellen zur Grundlegung des Historischen Materialismus. In Herbert Marcuse Schriften (pp. 509–554), Bd. 1. Suhrkamp.
Marcuse, H. (1936). Ideengeschichtlichen Teil. In M. Horkheimer et al., Studien über Autorität und Familie (pp. 136–228). Institut für Sozialforschung.
Marcuse, H. (2005). New Sources on the Foundation of Historical Materialism. In R. Wolin & J. Abromeit (Eds.), Heideggerian Marxism (pp. 86–121). University of Nebraska Press.
Marcuse, H. (1955). Eros and Civlization. Beacon Press.
Marcuse, H. (1969). An Essay on Liberation. Beacon Press.
Marcuse, H. (1972). Counterrevolution and Revolt. Beacon Press.
Marx, K. (1932/1982). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. In Marx Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), I, 2 (pp. 188–444). Dietz Verlag.
Marx, K. (1975). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In Marx/Engels Collected Works (MECW), vol. 3 (pp. 228–346). Lawrence and Wishart.
Miles, M. (2016). Eco-aesthetic dimensions: Herbert Marcuse, ecology and art. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1160640
Raulet, G. (1992). Herbert Marcuse. Philosophie de l’émancipation. Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.raule.1992.01
Reitz, C. (2000). Art, Alienation, and the Humanities. A Critical Engagement with Herbert Marcuse. SUNY Press.
Reitz, C. (2022). The Revolutionary Ecological Legacy of Herbert Marcuse. Daraja Press.
Schiller, F. (1795/1962). Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen. In Schillers Werke, Nationalausgabe, Bd. 20 (pp. 309–412). Verlag Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.
Schiller, F. (1967). On the aesthetic education of man. (E. M Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby, Trans.). Claredon Press.
Schmidt, A. (1973). Emanzipatorische Sinnlichkeit: Ludwig Feuerbachs anthropologischer Materialismus. Carl Hansen Verlag.
Seel, M. (1992). Versöhnung mit der Natur: Eine Überlegung zur Metakritik der instrumentellen Vernunft. In Kritik und Utopie im Werk von Herbert Marcuse (pp. 142–148), Hrsg. von der Institut für Socialwissenschaften. Suhrkamp.
Stevenson, N. (2020). Critical theory in the Anthropocene: Marcuse, Marxism and ecology. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(2), 211–226. http://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020962726
Toàn, T. (1971). Note sur le concept de « Gattungswesen » dans la pensée de Karl Marx. Revue philosophique de Louvain, 69(4), 525–536. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26336582
Wiggershaus, R. (1986). Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte, Theoretische Entwicklung, Politische Bedeutung. Fischer.
Vogel, S. (1996). Against Nature. The Concept of Nature in Critical Theory. SUNY Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Juliano Bonamigo Ferreira de Souza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
