Commentary on “The epistemic harms of empathy in phenomenological psychopathology” by Lucienne Spencer and Matthew Broome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.355491Keywords:
applied phenomenology, psychopathology, empathic understanding, epistemic justice, virtous listeningAbstract
This paper presents a critical commentary on the article “The Epistemic Harms of Empathy in Phenomenological Psychopathology” by Lucienne Spencer and Matthew Broome (2023). The authors committed the “fallacy of ambiguous or vague definition” by incorrectly interpreting Karl Jaspers’ conceptualizations, resulting in difficulties following logical arguments and arriving at reasonable conclusions. To overcome this fallacy, the commentary provides conceptual clarifications regarding Jaspers’ empathic understand-ing (einfühlendes Verstehen), which was conceived as the foundational concept of his project to develop a phenomenologically oriented psychopathology. Jaspers initially introduced this concept in the article “Die phänomenologische Forschungsrichtung in der Psychopathologie” [The Phenomenological Research Direction in Psychopathology], published in 1912, and extended in his magnum opus “Allgemeine Psychopathologie” [General Psychopathology], published in 1913.
Downloads
References
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1986). Mechanical, behavioral, and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, pp. 113–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01003.x
Breyer, T. (2013). Empathie und ihre Grenzen: Diskursive Vielfalt – phänomenale Einheit? In T. Breyer (Ed.), Grenzen der Empathie. Philosophie, psychologische und anthropologische Perspektiven (s. 7-36). Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846755167_003
Breyer, T. (2019). Self-affection and perspective-taking: The role of phantasmatic and imaginatory consciousness for empathy. TOPOI 39, pp. 803-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9627-4
Breyer, T. (2020). Empathy, sympathy, and compassion. In T. Szanto & H. Landweer (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotions (pp. 427–440). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180786
Breyer, T. & Hussain, S. T. (2014). Empathie. In G. Jüttemann (Ed.), Entwicklungen der Menschheit: “Integrative Humanwissenschaft“ als Forschungskooperative und Metadisziplin” (s. 233–240). Lengerich: Pabst.
Fuchs, T. (2017). Ecology of the Brain: The Phenomenology and Biology of the Embodied Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199646883.001.0001
Fuchs, T. (2019). Empathy, group identity, and the mechanisms of exclusion: An investigation into the limits of empathy. Topoi, 38, pp. 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9499-z
Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195138929.001.0001
Häfner, H. (2014). The concept of schizophrenia: From unity to diversity. Advances in Psychiatry 2014, pp. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/929434
Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1959). Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion [First Philosophy. Second Part: Theory of the Phenomenological Reduction]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Irarrázaval, L. (2020a). Empathy for the foreign experience: A convergent phenomenological definition. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(3), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000128
Irarrázaval, L. (2020b). A phenomenological paradigm for empirical research in psychiatry and psychology: Open questions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1399. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000128
Irarrázaval, L. (2022). Human vulnerability: A phenomenological approach to the manifestation and treatment of mental illness. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(4), 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2022.2048958
Irarrázaval, L. & Kalawski, J. P. (2022). Phenomenological considerations on empathy and emotions in psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology. Section Psychopathology. Research Topic “Situating Phenomenological Psychopathology: Subjective Experience Within the World.” https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000059
Jardine, J. (2014). Husserl and Stein on the phenomenology of empathy: perception and explication. Synthesis Philosophica, 29(2), 273-288.
Jardine, J. (2015). Stein and Honneth on Empathy and Emotional Recognition. Human Studies, 38(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9361-5
Jardine, J. (2017). Elementary recognition and empathy: A Husserlian account. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 5(1), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.19079/metodo.5.1.143
Jaspers, K. (1912). Die phänomenologische Forschungsrichtung in der Psychopathologie. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 9, 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911781
Jaspers, K. (1913). Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jaspers, K. (1948). Allgemeine Psychopathologie, 5. Aufl. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. (Originally published 1913).
Jaspers, K. (1968). The phenomenological approach in psychopathology. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 114(516), 1313–1323. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.114.516.1313. Originally published in 1912.
Jaspers, K. (1997). General Psychopathology (J. Hoenig & M.W. Hamilton, trans). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Originally published 1913). https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801858154
León, F., Zandersen, M., Meindl, P., and Zahavi, D. (2022). The distinction between second-person and third-person relations and its relevance for the psychiatric diagnostic interview. In M. Biondi, A. Picardi, M. Pallagrosi, & L. Fonzi (Eds.), The Clinician in the Psychiatric Diagnostic
Process (pp. 51-69). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90431-9_4
Ratcliffe, M. (2012). Phenomenology as a form of Empathy. Inquiry: A Journal Of Medical Care Organization, Provision, And Financing, 55(5), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2012.716196
Ratcliffe, M. J. (2017). Empathy without simulation. In M. Summa, T. Fuchs, & L. Vanzago (Eds.), Imagination and Social Perspectives: Approaches from Phenomenology and Psychopathology (pp. 199–220). London UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315411538
Ritunnano, R. (2022). Overcoming hermeneutical injustice in mental health: A role for critical phenomenology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2022.2031234
Schnegg, M. & Breyer, T. (2022). Empathy Beyond the Human. The Social Construction of a Multispecies World. Ethnos. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2022.2153153
Spencer, L. & Broome, M. (2023). The epistemic harms of empathy in phenomenological psychopathology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09930-1
Stanghellini, G. & Rosfort, R. (2013). Empathy as a Sense of Autonomy. Psychopathology, 46 (5): 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353273
Stein, E. (1917). On the problem of empathy, The collected works of Edith Stein, Vol. 3 (W. Stein, trans.). Washington, D.C.: ICS Publications 1989.
Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond Empathy Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, pp. 151–67.
Zahavi, D. (2007). Expression and Empathy. In D. Hutto & M. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Folk Psychology Re-Assessed (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5558-4_2
Zahavi, D. (2010). Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. Inquiry, 53, pp. 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201741003784663
Zahavi, D. (2014a). Empathy and Other-Directed Intentionality. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 33, pp. 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9197-4
Zahavi, D. (2014b). Self and Other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590681.001.0001
Zahavi, D. (2015). You, me and we - The sharing of emotional experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22, pp. 84–101.
Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology: The Basics. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315441603
Published
Versions
- 2025-02-05 (2)
- 2024-06-21 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Leonor Irarrázaval
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
