Max Weber and the Concept of the Political. The Warrior Ethics and Necessity of Guilt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.20504Keywords:
Weber, Max, Political, Nationalism, Warrior Ethics, GuiltAbstract
According to Max Weber, politics is struggle, violence is its specific mean, and war, its most sublime expression. It is nonetheless inaccurate to define Weber’s perspective as a warlike nationalism, inasmuch as his concept of the political as struggle is contaminated by the introduction of a sense of guilt, which consequently derives in a tragical account of the political. This article aims at understanding Weber’s concept of the political, identifying its inherent tension between struggle and guilt. Firstly, with the help of Leo Strauss, we try to answer the question of how does the guilt work in Weber’s concept of the political. Secondly, a chronological reading of Weber’s oeuvre permits to account for the emergence of this notion of political guilt. It is then argued that Weber’s concept of the political obtains its tragic character from the adoption of elements which pertain to the religious sphere. Finally, a series of conclusions are drawn, concerning Weber’s political thought as well as political contemporary theory in general.
Downloads
References
(1) Aron, Raymond. (1988). Introducción a Max Weber. En: Weber, Max. El político y el científico (pp. 9-77). Madrid: Alianza.
(2) Behnegar, Nasser. (2003). Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago.
(3) Bendix, Reinhard. (2012). Max Weber. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
(4) Descombes, Vincent. (1989). Philosophie par gros temps. París: Minuit.
(5) Donatello, Luis Miguel. (2005). La tensión entre las esferas religiosa y política en la Modernidad. Una lectura a través de Nietzsche y Weber. Nómadas (11), pp. 1-16.
(6) Galli, Carlo. (2001). Manuale di storia del pensiero politico. Boloña: Il Mulino.
(7) Herf, Jeffrey (1993). El modernismo reaccionario. Tecnología, cultura y política en Weimar y el Tercer Reich. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
(8) Piedras Monroy, Pedro. (2004). Max Weber y la crisis de las ciencias sociales. Madrid: Akal.
(9) Pinto, Julio. (1996). Max Weber actual. Liberalismo ético y democracia. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
(10) Platón. (2011). Diálogos II. Madrid: Gredos.
(11) Portantiero, Juan Carlos. (1982). Los escritos políticos de Max Weber. Desarrollo Económico, 22 (87), pp. 431-436.
(12) Radkau, Joachim. (2013). Max Weber. La pasión del pensamiento. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
(13) Ruano de la Fuente, Yolanda. (1996). Racionalidad y conciencia trágica. La modernidad según Max Weber. Madrid: Trotta.
(14) Schmitt, Carl. (2001). El concepto de lo político. En: Orestes Aguilar, Héctor (comp.). Carl Schmitt. Teólogo de la política (pp. 171-223). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
(15) Strauss, Leo. (2014). Derecho natural e historia. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
(16) Weber, Max. (1969). La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo. Barcelona: Península.
(17) Weber, Max. (1982). Escritos políticos. México, D. F.: Folio.
(18) Weber, Max. (1988). El político y el científico. Buenos Aires: Alianza.
(19) Weber, Max. (1998). Ensayos sobre sociología de la religión. Madrid: Taurus.
(20) Weber, Max. (2012). Economía y sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
(21) Weisz, Eduardo. (2008). La Religionssoziologie de Max Weber: claves para su interpretación. Latitude, 2 (2), pp. 9-33.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Estudios Políticos authorizes the copy of articles and texts for academic purposes or the internal use of institutions as long as the proper citation of the source is provided. Total or partial reproduction of the journal with different purposes should have an explicit authorization by the Institute of Politic Studies of the University of Antioquia.
The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessary reflect or bind those of the Institute of Political Studies of the University of Antioquia.