Definitions of the Concept of «Religion» in the Context of Modern Power Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n60a04Keywords:
Religion, Secularity, Beliefs, Legitimation, Pluralism, ModernityAbstract
This article examines political implications of the uses and meanings of the concept of «religion» in academic and institutional contexts. It presents a review of some of the main definitions of the concept provided by the social sciences, which are critically analyzed considering their consequences in the modern context of power relations. The investigation identifies five types of assumptions present in these definitions: a) Religion is conceived as opposed to secularity, c) it is imagined under an institutionalized form, b) it is expressed as a set of beliefs, d) which are considered as a private matter, and e) are about supernatural beings or forces. It is concluded that what we understand today as «religion» cannot be separated from processes of legitimation and domination, and that using the term to classify certain cultural expressions may overshadow their particularities and exclude them from public debate.
Downloads
References
Arnal, William. (2001). The Segregation of Social Desire. «Religion» and Disney World. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 69 (1), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/69.1.1
Arnal, William & McCutcheon, Russell. (2013). The Sacred is the Profane. The Political Nature of «Religion». New York: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757114.001.0001
Asad, Talal. (1993). Genealogies of Religion. Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Aupers, Stef & Houtman, Dick. (2010). The Social and Public Significance of New Age Spirituality. In: Aupers, Stef & Houtman, Dick (Eds.). Religions of Modernity: Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital (pp. 135-160). Leiden: Brill Academic.
Bainbridge, William. (2005). Atheism. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1 (1), pp. 1-23.
Bastian, Jean-Pierre. (2007). Pluralización religiosa, laicidad del Estado y proceso democrático en América Latina. Historia y Grafía, 29, pp. 167-194.
Beaman, Lori. (2013). Battles over Symbols: The «Religion» of the Minority Versus the «culture» of the Majority. Journal of Law and Religion, 28 (1), pp. 67-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0748081400000242
Beck, Ulrich. (2009). El Dios personal. La individualización de la religión y el «espíritu» del cosmopolitismo. Barcelona: Paidós.
Beckford, James. (2003). Social Theory and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051152075410. Bellah, Robert. (1967). Civil Religion in America. Daedalus, 96 (1), pp. 1-21.11. Beltrán, William. (2013). Pluralización religiosa y cambio social en Colombia. Theologica Xaveriana, 63 (175), pp. 57-85.
Benthall, Jonathan. (2008). Returning to Religion: Why a Secular Age is Haunted by Faith. London: I. B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755625062
Berger Peter. (1974). Some Second Thoughts on Substantive Versus Functionalist Definitions of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13 (2), pp. 125-133. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384374
Berger, Peter (Ed.). (1999). The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Washington: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
Beyer, Peter. (1999). Religión, problemas residuales y diferenciación funcional: una relación ambigua. Sociológica, 14 (41), pp. 199-209.
Beyer, Peter. (2013). Questioning the Secular/Religious Divide in a Post-Westphalian World. International Sociology, 28 (6), pp. 663-679. doi: 10.1177/026858091350707016. Bobbio, Norberto. (2005). Cultura laica y laicismo. Iglesia Viva, 222, pp. 147-149.
Bowie, Fiona. (2006). Anthropology of Religion. In: Segal, Robert Alan (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion (pp. 3-24). Malden: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631232162.2006.00003.x
Casanova, José. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001
Casanova, José. (2009). The Secular and Secularisms. Social Research, 76 (4), pp. 1049-1066.
Colombia. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. Constitución Política de la República de Colombia. (20 de julio de 1991). http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/constitucion_politica_1991.html
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. Sentencia C-088. (3 de marzo de 1994). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1994/c-088-94.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. Sentencia SU-510. (18 de septiembre de 1998). http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1998/SU510-98.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. Sentencia T-662. (7 de septiembre de 1999). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1999/T-662-99.htm
Davidsen, Markus. (2014). The Spiritual Tolkien Milieu. A Study of Fiction‐based Religion. (PhD. Thesis in Philosophy). Universidad de Leiden, Leiden.
Davie, Grace. (1990). Believing without Belonging: Is This the Future of Religion in Britain? Social Compass, 37 (4), pp. 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776890037004004
Debray, Regis. (2005). Les communions humaines. Pour en finir avec la «religión». Paris: Fayard.
Derrida, Jacques. (1996). Post-scriptum. En: Derrida, Jacques y Vattimo, Gianni (eds.). La religión (pp. 37-106). Madrid: PPC.
Durkheim, Émile. (1898). De la définition des phénomènes religieux. Année Sociologique. 2, pp. 1-28.
Durkheim, Émile. (1982). Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa. Madrid: Akal.
Dennett, Daniel. (2007). Romper el hechizo: la religión como fenómeno natural. Buenos Aires: Katz. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvm7bf9d
De La Torre, Renée. (2012). Religiosidades nómadas. Guadalajara: CIESAS
Evans-Pritchard, Edward. (1973). Las teorías de la religión primitiva. Madrid: Siglo xxi.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. (2007). Encompassing Religion, Privatized Religions, and the Invention of Modern Politics. In: Fitzgerald, Timothy (Ed.). Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations (pp. 211-240). London: Equinox.
Frazer, James. (2011). La rama dorada. México, D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Gauchet, Marcel. (2002). La Democratie contre Elle-Même. Paris: Gallimard.
Geertz, Clifford. (2001). La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Godoy, María Jesús. (2016). La condición sacra del desacralizado arte contemporáneo. Aisthesis, 59, pp. 203-222. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812016000100012
Habermas, Jürgen. (2005). Equal Treatment of Cultures and the Limits of Postmodern Liberalism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13 (1), pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00211.x
Habermas, Jürgen. (2006). Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14 (1), pp. 1-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
Habermas, Jürgen. (2010). An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity.
Harries, Jim. (2016). The Godless Delusion: Europe and Africa. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
James, William. (1986). Las variedades de la experiencia religiosa: estudio de la naturaleza humana. Barcelona: Península.
Latour, Bruno. (2005). «Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame» - or How not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In: Proctor, James (Ed.). Science, Religion, and the Human Experience (pp.27-48). Oxford: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195175328.003.000344. Latour, Bruno. (2013). Investigación sobre los modos de existencia. Una antropología de los modernos. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1995). Antropología estructural i. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Lipovetsky, Gilles. (1989). La era del vacío. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Luckmann, Thomas. (1973). La religión invisible. Salamanca: Sígueme.
Luhrmann, Tanya. (1989). Persuasions of the Witch’s Craft: Ritual Magic in Contemporary England. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Luhrmann, Tanya. (2012). A Hyperrealgod and Modern Belief. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Mind. Current Anthropology, 53 (4), pp. 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1086/666529
Nongbri, Brent. (2013). Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300154160.001.0001
Mallimaci, Fortunato y Esquivel, Juan. (2014). La contribución de la política y el Estado en la construcción del poder religioso. Revista Argentina de Ciencia Política, 17, pp. 71-89.
Mardones, José María. (2006). Religión y democracia. Cuestiones Teológicas, 33 (79), pp. 9-26.
Masuzawa, Tomoko. (2005). The Invention of World Religions. Chicago: The University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922621.001.0001
Meyer, Birgit. (2015). Picturing the Invisible. Visual Culture and the Study of Religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 27, pp. 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341357
Otto, Rudolf. (2005). The Idea of the Holy. In: McCutcheon, Russell (Ed.). The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader (pp. 74-81). New York: Continuum.
Parker, Cristián. (2005). ¿América Latina ya no es católica? Pluralismo cultural y religioso creciente. América Latina Hoy, 41, pp. 35-56. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.2431
Parker, Cristián. (2010). El eclesiocentrismo en los clásicos de la sociología occidental. En: Gutiérrez, Daniel (ed.). Religiosidades y creencias contemporáneas. Diversidad de lo simbólico en el mundo actual (pp. 47-69). Zinacantepec: El Colegio Mexiquense.
Sarrazin, Jean Paul. (2017). Budismo universal, budismo individual. Análisis del interés por la espiritualidad oriental en Occidente. Revista Escritos, 25 (54), pp. 59-81. https://doi.org/10.18566/escr.v25n54.a04
Sarrazin, Jean Paul. (2018). Religión: ¿sabemos de lo que estamos hablando? Examen sobre la viabilidad de una categoría analítica para las ciencias sociales. Criterio Libre, 16 (29), pp. 68-84. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2018v16n29.5008
Sarrazin, Jean Paul y Arango, Paulina. (2017). La alternativa cristiana en la modernidad tardía. Razones de la migración religiosa del catolicismo al pentecostalismo. Revista Folios, 46, pp. 41-54. doi: 10.17227/01234870.46folios41.54
Sarrazin, Jean Paul y Redondo, Saira Pilar. (2018). Indígenas evangélicos y diversidad cultural. Análisis de una problemática multiculturalista. Revista de Derecho, 49, pp. 203-228.
Sarrazin, Jean Paul y Rincón, Lina. (2015). La conversión al islam como estrategia de cambio y diferenciación en la modernidad. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 51, pp. 132-145. doi: 10.7440/res51.2015.10
Smart, Ninian. (2005). Within and Without Religion. In: McCutcheon, Russell (Ed.). The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion (pp. 221-234). New York: Continuum.
Smith, Jonathan. (1982). Imagining Religion. From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: Chicago University.
Smith, Jonathan. (1998). Religion, Religions, Religious. In: Taylor, Mark (Ed.). Critical Terms for Religious Studies (pp. 269-84). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Stark, Rodney & Finke, Roger. (2000). Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley: University of California. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520924345
Schmitt, Carl. (2000). Catolicismo y forma política. Madrid: Tecnos.
Taylor, Charles. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxrpz54
Tylor, Edward. (1981). Cultura primitiva ii. La religión en la cultura primitiva. Madrid: Ayuso.
United Kingdom. The Supreme Court. Judgment UKSC 77. (11 December 2013). R (on the application of Hodkin and another) (Appellants) v Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages (Respondent). https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0030-judgment.pdf
Wood, Matthew. (2007). Possession, Power, and the New Age: Ambiguities of Authority in Neoliberal Societies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Estudios Políticos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Estudios Políticos authorizes the copy of articles and texts for academic purposes or the internal use of institutions as long as the proper citation of the source is provided. Total or partial reproduction of the journal with different purposes should have an explicit authorization by the Institute of Politic Studies of the University of Antioquia.
The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessary reflect or bind those of the Institute of Political Studies of the University of Antioquia.
