Face masks vs. COVID-19: a systematic review
Keywords:COVID-19, coronavirus infections, masks
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) spread rapidly around the world. Two types of approaches have been applied to use of face masks as a tool to prevent the spread this disease in society. The aim of the systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of face masks against the novel coronavirus. A literature search was performed using different databases until April 30, 2020. Search terms were ‘facemasks’, ‘novel coronavirus’, and ‘healthcare workers’. Five studies were included in the systematic review. A study stated that no difference between surgical and cotton masks. Also, two studies have emphasized the use of surgical masks or N95 respirators by medical staff, and two other studies emphasized the use of any type of face mask by general public. More studies in controlled contexts and studies of infections in healthcare and community places are needed for better definition of the effectiveness of face masks in preventing coronavirus.
[cited 1 March 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
2. Cereda D, Tirani M, Rovida F, Demicheli V, Ajelli M, Poletti P, et al. The early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in
Lombardy, Italy 2020 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 16 Jun 2020]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.09320v1
3. World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19):
interim guidance [Internet]. Geneve: WHO; 2020 [cited 2020 19 March]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/
4. Little S. What the BC CDC says you’re getting wrong about the novel coronavirus. Global News. 2020 [cited 1
March 2020] Available from: https://globalnews.ca/news/6486026/bc-cdc-coronavirus-misconceptions/
5. Chughtai AA, Seale H, MacIntyre CR. Availability, consistency and evidence-base of policies and guidelines on
the use of mask and respirator to protect hospital health care workers: a global analysis. BMC Res. Notes. 2013;
6. Bae S, Kim M-C, Kim JY, Cha H-H, Lim JS, Jung J, et al. Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking
SARS–CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients. Ann. Intern. Medicine. 2020:M20-1342.
7. Wang, X, Pan Z, Cheng Z. Association between 2019-nCoV transmission and N95 respirator use. J. Hosp. Infect.
8. Cheng VC, Wong SC, Chen JHK, Yip CC, Chuang VWM, Tsang OTY, et al. Escalating infection control response to
the rapidly evolving epidemiology of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong.
Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020; 41(5):493-8.
9. Eikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboi E, Phan T, Eikenberry K, Kuang Y, et al. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the
potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling.
10. Worby CJ, Chang HH. Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19
pandemic. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020: 2020.04.04.20052696.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.