Experiences and Perceptions in Dyads about Ostomy Care. Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e12Keywords:
caregivers, ostomy, patients, perceptions, nursingAbstract
Objective. To understand the experiences and perceptions of care dyads (person and caregiver) when having a permanent discharge ostomy.
Methods. Meta-synthesis that followed the ENTREQ standards and was registered in PROSPERO CRD42020221755; It was developed in three phases: (i). Search for studies in academic search engines, with MeSH terms: [(Patients) AND (Ostomy)) AND (Caregivers)], including qualitative primary studies published between 2000 and 2020; (ii). Assessment of the methodological quality with the CORE-Q instrument and the credibility of qualitative findings under the guidelines of the Johanna Briggs Institute; and (iii). Comparative analysis according to the guidelines by Sandelowski and Barroso.
Results. The work identified 664 studies; in screening, 35 passed to full-text analysis; 22 to methodological quality evaluation; and 10 to meta-synthesis. The study found 43 qualitative findings that constituted four categories: dyads perform instrumental and emotional care; ambivalent family caregiving feelings and actions; assertive and effective family care; and rejection of bodily changes and sexual dysfunction. These categories constitute the central meta-theme: “The dyads experience a life rupture, which is restored in a sea of ambivalent emotions and learning; at the same time, affective, instrumental and assertive care is constructed”.
Conclusions: People who experience having a permanent discharge ostomy express their rejection to the change in bodily image, alterations in sexual life and as a couple. Caregivers and families are the main source of support by being facilitators in self-care, through relationships of mutuality and reciprocity.
Downloads
References
1. Kozell K, Forest-Lalande L, Gray M, Abrams H, Lynne Harris C, Mills-Zorzes S. Cuidado y manejo de la ostomía. Guías de buenas prácticas clínicas. Ontario: RNAO; 2009. P:92–109.
2. Vural F, Harputlu D, Karayurt O, Suler G, Edeer AD, Ucer C, et al. The Impact of an Ostomy on the Sexual Lives of Persons with Stomas. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2016; 43(4):381–4.
3. Cengiz B, Bahar Z. Perceived Barriers and Home Care Needs When Adapting to a Fecal Ostomy. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2017; 44(1):63–8.
4. Villa G, Vellone E, Sciara S, Stievano A, Proietti MG, Manara DF, et al. Two new tools for self‐care in ostomy patients and their informal caregivers: Psychosocial, clinical, and operative aspects. Int. J. Urol. Nurs. 2019;13(1):23–30.
5. Hernández NE, Moreno CM BJ. Necesidades de cuidado de la díada cuidador-persona: expectativa de cambio en intervenciones de enfermería. Rev. Cuid. 2014;5(2):748–56.
6. Villa G, Mannarini M, Della Giovanna G, Marzo E, Manara DF, Vellone E. A literature review about self-care on ostomy patients and their caregivers. Int. J. Urol. Nurs. 2019; 13(2):75–80.
7. Chaparro L. How a “Special Caring Bond” is Formed Between the Chronically Ill Patient and the Family Caregiver. Aquichan. 2011; 11(1):7–22.
8. Nova-Rodríguez, J, Camargo F, Garzón L, Pereira-Flórez M; Calderón-Venegas M. Perfil epidemiológico de la población con ostomías de eliminación de una institución de salud de Colombia. Enferm. Dermatol. 2018; 12(33):24–31.
9. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Creating meta-summaries of qualitative findings. Nurs. Res. 2003; 52:226-31.
10. Arias-Murcia S. Experiencia de enfermeras cuidando a familias multiculturales: una metasíntesis cualitativa. [Internet]. 2015. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Facultad de Enfermería.
11. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2012; 12:181.
12. Quemba-Mesa MP, Diaz-Fernandez JK, Vargas-Rodríguez LY, Bautista-Plazas L, Pulido-Barragán SP. Experiencias y percepciones de las díadas de cuidados al tener una ostomía de eliminación permanente. Meta-síntesis. PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020221755. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020221755
13. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57.
14. Joanna Briggs Institute. Reviewers’ Manual. The University of Adelaide. South Australia. 2014. p. 23-25
15. Altschuler A, Liljestrand P, Grant M, Hornbrook MC, Krouse RS, McMullen CK. Caregiving and mutuality among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies: qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2018; 26(2):529-37.
16. Poletto D, Silva DM, Guerreiro V. Vivir con estoma intestinal: la construcción de la autonomía para el cuidado. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2013; 21(2):531-8.
17. Halliday V, Baker M, Thomas AL, Bowrey D. Patient and Family Caregivers' Experiences of Living with a Jejunostomy Feeding Tube After Surgery for Esophagogastric Cancer. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 2017; 41(5):837-43.
18. McMullen CK, Wasserman J, Altschuler A, Grant ML, Hornbrook MC, Liljestrand P, Briggs C, Krouse RS. Untreated peristomal skin complications among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2011; 15(6):644-50.
19. McMullen CK, Kwan ML, Colwell JC, Munneke JR, Davis JV, Firemark A, Brooks N, Grant M, Gilbert SM, Altschuler A. Recovering from Cystectomy: Patient Perspectives. Bladder Cancer. 2019; 5(1):51-61.
20. Tao-Maruyama, Sônia-Ayako. A experiência da colostomia por câncer como ruptura biográfica na visão dos portadores, familiares e profissionais de saúde: um estudo etnográfico [Dissertation]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2004. Available from: https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/22/22132/tde-19052004-195459/pt-br.php
21. Silva AL, Shimizu HE. A relevância da Rede de Apoio ao estomizado. Rev. Bra.s Enferm. 2007; 60(3):307-11.
22. Swenne C, Cederholm K, Gustafsson M, Arakelian E. Postoperative health and patients' experiences of efficiency and quality of care after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, two to six months after surgery. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2015; 19(2):191-7.
23. Sujianto U, Billy R, Margawati A. Family’s Experience: Nursing Care for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Colostomy. Nurse Media J. Nurs. 2020; 10(1):96–106.
24. Villa G, Manara DF, Brancato T, Rocco G, Stievano A, Vellone E, et al. Life with a urostomy: A phenomenological study. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2018; 39:46–52.
25. Carrillo-González GM, Gómez-Ramírez OJ, Vargas-Rosero E. La Metasíntesis: una Metodología de Investigación. Rev. Salud Pública. 2007; 9(4):609-17
26. Carreño-Moreno SPa, Chaparro-Díaz L. Metasíntesis: discusión de un abordaje metodológico. Cienc. Enferm. 2015; 21(3): 123-31.
27. Sharma A, Duc NTM, Thang TLL, Nam NH, Ng SJ, et al. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2021; 36(10):3179-87.
28. France EF, Cunningham M, Ring N, Uny I, Duncan EA, Jepson RG, et al. Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2019;19(1):25.
29. Clark JP. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript? In: Peer Review in Health Sciences. Second edition. Edited by Godlee F, Jefferson T. London: BMJ Books; 2003: 219-35
30. Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual. Life Res. 2021; 30(8):2197-218.
31. Capilla-Díaz C, Bonill-de Las Nieves C, Hernández-Zambrano SM, Montoya-Juárez R, Morales-Asencio JM, Pérez-Marfil, MN, Hueso-Montoro C. Living with an Intestinal Stoma: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Qual. Health Res. 2019;29(9):1255-65.
32. Pape E, Vlerick I, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Van de Putte D, van Ramshorst GH, Geboes K, et al. Experiences and needs of patients with rectal cancer confronted with bowel problems after stoma reversal: A systematic review and thematic-synthesis. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2021; 54:102018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102018
33. Danielsen AK. Life after stoma creation. Dan. Med. J. 2013; 60(10):B4732.
34. Danielsen AK, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Spouses of patients with a stoma lack information and support and are restricted in their social and sexual life: a systematic review. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28(12):1603–12.
35. García R, Heras A. Impacto en la calidad de vida, imagen corporal y sexualidad de las ostomías. 2019 [cited 4 Apr 2021]. Available from: https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/691644/garcia_lopez_raquel.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
36. González L. Ostomías y sexualidad. Un enfoque enfermero. N Punto.2020; III (33):35-55.
37. Galindo DY. Necesidades de Cuidado de personas con Ostomías. Revisión Sistemática de Literatura. Rev. Salud. Hist. Sanid. 2019; 14(1):41–9.
38. Araujo Torquato Lopes AP, Das Neves Decesario M. The Adjustments Experienced by Persons with an Ostomy: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2014; 60:34-42.
39. Ferreira-Umpiérrez AH. Viviendo con una ostomía: Percepciones y expectativas desde la fenomenología social. Texto Context. Enferm. 2013; 22(3):687–94.
40. Rojas Barbosa JC, Quemba Mesa MP. Díadas de cuidado y competencia para cuidar al alta hospitalaria en un hospital de Bogotá. Revista Investig. Salud Univ. Boyacá. 2020; 7(1):71-86.
41. Mota MS, Gomes G, Petuco VM, Heck RM, Barros EJ, de Oliveira VL. Facilitators of the transition process for the self-care of the person with stoma: subsidies for Nursing. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2015; 49(1):80-6.
42. Kang, E., Gillespie, B. M., Tobiano, G., & Chaboyer, W. Discharge education delivered to general surgical patients in their management of recovery post discharge: A systematic mixed studies review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2018; 87:1–13.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-09-20 (3)
- 2022-07-14 (2)
- 2022-06-27 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.
