Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04Keywords:
caregivers, nursing, chronic disease, telephone, pragmatic clinical trialAbstract
Objective. To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies. Methods. A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical development in Colombia and Brazil. Recruitment was measured by the number of participants eligible and consented. Retention was assessed by the percentage of participants with outcomes
data at two follow-ups. The intervention adherence was measured by the percentage of the caregiver who received the intervention.
Results. Of the family caregivers assessed, 63% were eligible, and 32.9% declined to be in the study for time restriction or no interest. In Colombia, the total retention rate of caregivers was 63.4% at the first follow-up and 48% at the second follow-up, while in Brazil was de 52.8% and 46.2%, respectively. At the end of the study, the sample comprised 28 and 70 caregivers in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for a retention rate of 47%. Of 104 family caregivers allocated to the intervention group, 42 (40.3%) received five sessions. Most reported not completing the Caregiver´s Activity
Diary.
Conclusion. The recruitment of family caregivers, participant retention, and adherence to the telephone intervention was unsuccessful. Future studies should apply an assessment tool during the recruitment of family caregivers and replace the term "caregiver" with "care provider"; in the material involved in the research; define a retention protocol before starting the study and involve family caregivers in the design of the interventions.
Downloads
References
1. Akçoban S, Eskimez Z. Homecare patients’ quality of life and the burden of family caregivers: a descriptive cross-
sectional study. Home Health Care Serv. Q. 2023; 1–14.
2. Zhao XS, Wang HY, Zhang LL, Liu YH, Chen HY, Wang Y. Prevalence and risk factors associated with the
comprehensive needs of cancer patients in China. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2019; 17(1):102.
3. Railka A, Oliveira S, Cordeiro Rodrigues R, Emille Carvalho De Sousa V, Gabrielle De Sousa Costa A, Venícios De
Oliveira Lopes M, et al. Clinical indicators of ‘caregiver role strain’ in caregivers of stroke patients. Contemp. Nurse.
; 44(2):215–24.
4. Hermes-Pereira A, Ferreira P, Santos MCFB dos, Fagundes PA, Gonçalves APB, Rados DV, et al. Protocol for a
randomized clinical trial: telephone-based psychoeducation and support for female informal caregivers of patients
with dementia. Geriatr. Gerontol. Aging. 2021; 15:1-8.
5. Corry M, Neenan K, Brabyn S, Sheaf G, Smith V. Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for
providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses. Cochrane
Database Syst. Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012533
6. Rueda Díaz LJ, da Cruz Monteiro D. Adaptation Model in a Controlled Clinical Trial Involving Family Caregivers of
Chronic Patients. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2017; 26(4):e0970017.
7.Rueda Díaz LJ, da Cruz DLM. Designing a telephone intervention program for family caregivers. Rev. Esc. Enferm.
USP. 2017; 51:e03297.
8. Chaudhari N, Ravi R, Gogtay N, Thatte U. Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges
and solutions. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2020; 11(2):64-9.
9. Vrijens B, Urquhart J. Methods for measuring, enhancing, and accounting for medication adherence in clinical trials.
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014; 95(6):617-26.
10. Boltz M, Kuzmik A, Resnick B, BeLue R. Recruiting and Retaining Dyads of Hospitalized Persons with Dementia and
Family Caregivers. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2022; 44(3):319-27.
11. Bremer W, Sarker A. Recruitment and retention in mobile application-based intervention studies: a critical synopsis
of challenges and opportunities. Inform Health Soc Care. 2022;1–14.
12. Watson NL, Mull KE, Heffner JL, McClure JB, Bricker JB. Participant Recruitment and Retention in Remote eHealth
Intervention Trials: Methods and Lessons Learned from a Large Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Web-Based
Smoking Interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018; 20(8):e10351.
13. Pfeiffer K, Beische D, Hautzinger M, Berry JW, Wengert J, Hoffrichter R, et al. Telephone-based problem-solving
intervention for family caregivers of stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2014;
(4):628–43.
14. Kwok T, Wong B, Ip I, Chui K, Young D, Ho F. Telephone-delivered psychoeducational intervention for Hong Kong
Chinese dementia caregivers: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2013; 8:1191–7.
15. Hazell CM, Jones CJ, Pandey A, Smith HE. Barriers to recruiting and retaining psychosis carers: A case study on
the lessons learned from the Caring for Caregivers (C4C) trial. BMC Res. Notes. 2019; 12(1):810.
16. Kishita N, Gould RL, Farquhar M, Contreras M, Hout V, Losada A, et al. Internet-delivered guided self-help
acceptance and commitment therapy for family carers of people with dementia (iACT4CARERS): a feasibility study.
Aging Ment. Health. 2021; 2022(10):1933–41.
17. Heckel L, Gunn KM, Livingston PM. The challenges of recruiting cancer patient/caregiver dyads: Informing
randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018;18(1):146.
18. Bouchard EG, Epstein LH, Patel H, Vincent PC, LaValley SA, Devonish JA, et al. Behavioral parenting skills as a
novel target for improving medication adherence in young children: Feasibility and acceptability of the CareMeds
intervention. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2022; 39(6):529-39.
19. Felipe Silva AR, Fhon JRS, Rodrigues RAP, Leite MTP. Caregiver overload and factors associated with care
provided to patients under palliative care. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2021; 39(1):e10.
20. Cardoso AL, Oliveira Silva-Junior G, Freitas Bastos L, Medeiros Cesar AL, Serrano LG, Dziedzic A, et al.
Preliminary Assessment of the Quality of Life and Daily Burden of Caregivers of Persons with Special Needs: A
Questionnaire-Based, Cross-Sectional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2012.
21. Aoun S, Slatyer S, Deas K, Nekolaichuk C. Family Caregiver Participation in Palliative Care Research: Challenging
the Myth. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 53(5):851-61.
22. Murphy MR, Escamilla MI, Blackwell PaulaH, Lucke KT, Miner-Williams D, Shaw V, et al. Assessment of caregivers’
willingness to participate in an intervention research study. Res. Nurs. Health. 2007; 30(3):347–55.
23. Hansen D, Petrinec A, Hebeshy M, Sheehan D, Drew BL. Advancing the Science of Recruitment for Family
Caregivers: Focus Group and Delphi Methods. JMIR Nurs. 2019; 2(1):e13862.
24. Rhudy LM, Hines EA, Farr EM, Esterov D, Chesak SS. Feasibility and acceptability of the Resilient Living program
among persons with stroke or brain tumor and their family caregivers. NeuroRehabilitation. 2023; 52:123–35.
25. Whitebird RR, Kreitzer MJ, Lewis BA, Hanson LR, Crain AL, Enstad CJ, et al. Recruiting and retaining family
caregivers to a randomized controlled trial on mindfulness-based stress reduction. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2011;
(5):654–61.
26. de Souza Guedes E. Instrument to assess fidelity of an intervention offered by telephone. [Sao Paulo]: Universidade
de Sao Paulo; 2016.
27. Mou H, Wong MS, Chien WT. Effectiveness of dyadic psychoeducational intervention for stroke survivors and family
caregivers on functional and psychosocial health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021;
:103969.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-08-24 (2)
- 2023-06-20 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.
