Decentralized power generation through biomass gasification: a technical – economic analysis and implications by reduction of CO2 emissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.12476Keywords:
biomass, gasification, biopower, generation cost, clean development mechanism (CDM)Abstract
This article presents the feasibility analysis of two electricity generation projects with wood biomass. The first one considers a wood harvested for energy from a forest with pine plantation (case 1), and the second one, biomass residues from a teak plantation (case 2). Electric power that can be produced is 2.0 MWe for pine’s case, and 1.0 MWe for teak. Considering the power to generate and after a strict literature search and analysis, the most suitable electricity generation technology is thermo-chemical process of gasification coupled with combustion engines. Generation cost (USD/kWe-h) is calculated for each technological alternative with a technical-economic analysis, as result the lowest costs are approx. 0.061 USD/kWe-h for 1.0 MWe, and 0.058 USD/kWe-h for 2.2 MWe, assuming that biomass’ cost is zero (0 USD/ton). This is considered the baseline for electricity generation projects with biomass in Colombia. The research is complemented with a CDM projects applicability analysis, finding that the sale of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) would reduce kWe-h cost between from 0.003 to 0.01 USD/kWe-h, in the studied power plants. However, neither the price neither the sale of CERs can be guarantee because there is not a tool to extend the Kyoto protocol, which comprises a first period between 2008 and 2012.
Downloads
References
T. Mc’Gowan. Biomass and Alternate Fuel Systems - An Engineering and Economic Guide. Ed. Wiley. New Jersey (USA). 2009. pp. 225-237.
C. Wu, H. Huang, S. Zheng, X. Yin. “An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China”. Bioresource Tech. Vol. 83. 2002. pp. 65-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X
P. Quaak, H. Knoef, H. Stassen. Energy from Biomass: A review of Combustion and Gasification Technologies. Ed. World Bank. Vol. 422. Washington D. C. (USA). 1999. pp. 40-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4335-1
B. Buragohain, P. Mahanta, V. Moholkar. “Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective”. Renew. and Sust. Energy Reviews. Vol. 14. 2010. pp. 73-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.034
J. Córdoba, Y. Lenis, J. F. Pérez. Generación de energía eléctrica mediante aprovechamiento energético de la biomasa: modelo técnico financiero para la selección de tecnologías en Colombia. En 4º Simposio nacional forestal. Medellín (Colombia). 2010. pp. 2.
A. Kirkels, G. Verbong. “Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 15. 2011. pp. 471-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.046
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Combined Heat and Power Partnership: biomass Combined Heat and Power. Catalog of Technologies. California (USA). 2007. pp. 20-25.
A. Caputo, M. Palumbo, P. Pelagagge, F. Scacchia. “Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables”. Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol 28. 2005. pp. 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.04.009
B. Jenkins. “A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling”. Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol. 13. 1997. pp 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00085-8
T. Johansson, H. Kelly, A. Reddy, R. Williams. Renewable Energy - Source for Fuels and Electricity. Ed. Laurie Burnham. Washington D.C. (USA).1993. pp. 729-785.
M. Nouni, S. Mullick, T. Kandpal. “Biomass gasifier projects for decentralized power supply in India: A financial evaluation”. Energy Policy. Vol. 35. 2007. pp. 1373-1385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.016
Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética - UPME. Plan energético nacional 2006-2025 (PEN). Contexto y Estrategias. Bogotá D.C. (Colombia). 2011. pp. 139- 237.
Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética - UPME. Plan de desarrollo para las fuentes no convencionales de energía en Colombia (PDFNCE). Bogotá D.C. (Colombia). 2010. pp. 5.1-5.17.
O. Escobar, J. Rodríguez. “Teca”. Las maderas en Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, SENA. Medellín (Colombia). 1993. pp. 1-5.
O. Escobar, J. Rodríguez. “Patula”. Las maderas en Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, SENA. Medellín (Colombia). 1993. pp. 1-5.
J. Pérez, C. Orrego, J. Largo. Evaluación de las principales especies forestales con potencial dendroenergético en Colombia mediante el proceso de gasificación. En 4º Simposio nacional forestal. Medellín (Colombia). 2010. pp. 5.
Z. Alimuddin, P. Lahijani, M. Mohammadi, A. Mohamed. “Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 14. 2010. pp. 2852-2862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.026
J. Heywood. Internal Combustion Engines Fundamentals. Ed. Mc Graw Hill. New York (USA). 1988. pp. 19-21.
Z. Zainal, A. Rifau, G. Quadir, K. Seetharamu. “Experimental investigation of a downdraft biomass gasifier”. Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol. 23. 2002. pp. 283-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00059-4
C. Wu, X. Yin, L. Ma, Z. Zhou, H. Chen. “Operational characteristics of a 1.2 MW biomass gasification and power generation plant”. Biotechnology Advances. Vol. 27. 2009. pp. 588-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.020
U. Henriksen, J. Ahrenfeldt, T. Jensen, B. Gøbel, J. Bentzen, C. Hindsgaul, L. Sørensen. “The design, construction and operation of a 75 kW two-stage gasifier”. Energy. Vol. 31. 2006. pp. 1542-1553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.031
J. Pérez. Gasificación de biomasa: Estudios teórico experimentales en lecho fijo equicorriente. Ed. Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín (Colombia). 2009. pp. 24-39.
H. Stassen. Small Scale Biomass Gasifiers for Heat and Power. Ed. World Bank. Washintong, D.C. (USA). 1995. pp. 12,13, 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-3371-2
A. Bridgwater. “The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation”. Fuel. Vol. 74. 1995. pp. 631-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)00001-L
E. Kurkela. Review of Finnish biomass gasification technologies. OPET Report 4. 2002. pp. 4-10.
E. Larson. Small-Scale Gasification-Based Biomass Power Generation. En Biomass Workshop. Changhun Congress (China) . 1998. pp. 1-6.
P. Mc’Kendry. “Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass”. Bioresource Technology. Vol. 83. 2002. pp. 37- 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3
R. Warnecke. “Gasification of biomass: comparison of fixed bed and fluidized bed gasifier”. Biomass and Bioenergy. Vol. 18. 2000. pp. 489-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00009-X
T. Mc’Gowan. Biomass and Alternate Fuel Systems - An Engineering and Economic Guide. Ed. Jhon Wiley & Sons. New Jersey (USA). 2009. pp. 183-221.
UNFCCC. Indicative Simplified Baseline and Monitoring Methodologies for Selected Small- Scale CDM Project Activity Categories. Disponible en www.cdm.unfccc.int. Consultada el 10 de abril 2011.
UNFCCC. Annex 18 Definition of renewable biomass, Report of Executive Board meeting number 23. Disponible en: www.cdm.unfccc.int. Consultada el 10 de abril 2011. 32. Ministerio de Minas y Energía Colombia. Resolución No. 180947 de junio 4 de 2010. 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Facultad de Ingeniería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
The material published in the journal can be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if the respective credits are given to the journal. No commercial benefit can be obtained and derivative works must be under the same license terms as the original work.