Burocracia y eficiencia en la provisión de bienes públicos: un modelo espacial de competencia política
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n73a7865Palabras clave:
Competencia política, eficiencia gubernamental, tamaño del gobiernoResumen
Este artículo presenta un modelo espacial de competencia política para analizar el efecto que tiene la competencia política sobre el desempeño gubernamental, en el sentido de la eficiencia del nivel de empleo burocrático y en la provisión de bienes públicos. En contraste con otros argumentos que relacionan positivamente la competencia política y la eficiencia del gobierno, el principal resultado muestra que en cualquier equilibrio político-económico la competencia política genera incentivos para un nivel de empleo burocrático excesivo y una provisión ineficiente de bienes públicos.
Descargas
Citas
Alesina, Alberto y Rodrik, Danni (1994). “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 465-90.
Alesina, Alberto; Baquir, Reza y Easterly, William (1998). “Redistributive Public Employment”, NBER Working Papers, No. 7387.
Austen-Smith, David y Banks, Jeffrey S. (1989). “Electoral Accountability and Incumbency”, En: Peter Ordeshook (ed.), Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, University of Michigan Press.
Barro, Robert (1973). “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model”, Public Choice, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 19-42.
Barro, Robert (1991). “A Cross Country Study of Growth, Saving and Government”, NBER Working Papers, No. 2855.
Becker, Gary (1983). “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 371-400.
Becker, Gary (1985). “Public Policies, Pressure Groups and Gead Weight Costs”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 330-347.
Becker, Gary y Mulligan, Casey (1998). “Deadweight Cost and the Size of Government”, NBER Working Papers, No. 6789.
Bénabou, Roland (1996). “Inequality and Growth”, En: Ben S. Bernanke y Julio J. Rotemberg (eds.), National Bureau of Economic Research Macro Annual, Vol. 11, pp. 11-74, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Bergstrom, Theodore C. y Goodman, Robert (1973). “Private Demands for Public Goods”, American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 280-296.
Bertola, Giuseppe (1993). “Factor Shares and Savings in Endogenous Growth”, American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No.5, pp. 1184-1198.
Black, Duncan (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
Bonilla, Claudio y Gatica, Leonardo (2005). “Economía Política Neoclásica y la América Latina”, El Trimestre Económico, Vol. LXXII, No. 285, pp. 179-211.
Brennan, Geoffrey y Buchanan, James (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge University Press.
Breton, Albert (1974). The Economic Theory of Representative Government, Aldine Transaction.
Brusco, Valeria; Nazareno, Marcelo y Stokes, Susan. (2004). “Vote Buying in Argentina”, Latin American Research Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 66-88.
Budge, Ian; Klingemann Hans-Dieter; Volkens, Aandrea; Bara, Judith y Tanenbaum, Eric (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences, Oxford University Press.
Cornelius, Wayne A. (2004). “Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics”, En: Jorge I. Domínguez y Chappell Lawson (eds.), Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Elections: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Coughlin, Peter J. (1992). Probabilistic Voting Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary, y J. Morgan, Kousser (1981). “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No.4, pp. 646-663.
Cox, Gary y Thies, Michael F. (2000). “How Much Does Money Matter? ‘Buying’ Votes in Japan, 1967-1990”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 37-57.
Davis, Otto y Hinich, Melvin J. (1968). “On the Power and Importance of the Mean Preference in a Mathematical Model of Democratic Choice”, Public Choice, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 59-72.
Davis, Otto y Hinich, Melvin J. (1966). “A Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in Democratic Societies”, en Joseph Benvd (ed.). Mathematical Applications in Political Science, II, Dallas, Southern Methodist University Press.
Davis, Otto y Hinich, Melvin J. (1967). “Some Results Related to a Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in Democratic Societies”, en Joseph Benvd (ed.). Mathematical Applications in Political Science, III, Dallas, Southern Methodist University Press.
Davis, Otto; Melvin J. y Ordeshook, Peter (1970). “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 426-448.
Davis, Otto; Degroot, Morris y Hinich, Melvin J. (1972). “Social Preference Ordering and Majority Rule”, Econometrica, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 147-157.
Dixit, Avinash y Londregan, John (1996). “The Determinants of Success of Special Interest in Redistributive Politics”, Journal of Politics, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 1132-1155.
Dixit, Avinash y Londregan, John (1998). “Ideology, Tactics, and Efficiency in Redistributive Politics”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 2, pp. 497-529.
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, Harper and Row.
Enelow, James M. y Hinich, Melvin J. (1990). “The Theory of Predictive Mappings”, En: James Enelow y Melvin Hinich (eds.), Advances of the Spatial Theory of Voting, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Enelow, James M. y Hinich, Melvin J. (1989). “The Location of American Presidential Candidates: An Empirical Test of a New Spatial Model of Elections”, Mathematical Computer Modelling, Vol. 12, No. 4-5, pp.461-470.
Estevez, Federico; Magaloni, Beatriz y Díaz-Cayeros Alberto (2002). “The Erosion of One Party Rule: Clientelism, Portfolio Diversification and Electoral Strategy”, artículo preparado para presentarse en el Encuentro Anual de 2002 de la Asociación Americana de Ciencia Política en Boston.
Ferejohn, John (1986). “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control”, Public Choice, Vol. 50, No. 1-3, pp. 5-26.
Gatica, Leonardo A. (2007). “A Formal Analysis of Patronage Politics”, En: Melvin Hinich y William Barnett (eds.), Topics in Analytical Political Economy, Sage Press.
Grillo, Michele. y Polo, Michele (1993). “Political Exchange and Allocation of Surplus: A model of Tow Party Competition”, en A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salomon y R. Wintrobe (eds.), Preferences and Democracy, Norwell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Grossman, Herschel (1994). “Production, Appropriation and Land Reform”, American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 705-12.
Grossman, Herschel (1999). “Kleptocracy and Revolutions”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 267-83.
Grossman, Herschel y Kim, Minseong. (1996). “Predation and Accumulation”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 333-351.
Hinich, Melvin J. y Munger, Michael (1994). Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice, Ann Harbor, University of Michigan Press.
Hotelling, Harold. (1929). “Stability in Competition”, Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 153, pp. 41-57.
Iversen, Torven (1994a). “The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional and Mobilizational Effects”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 155-189.
Iversen, Torven (1994b). “Political Leadership and Representation in Western European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting”, American journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 45-74.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques (1999). Incentives and Political Economy, Oxford University Press.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques y Martimort, David (2002). The Theory of Incentives, Princeton University Press.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques y Tirole, Jean. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, MIT Press. Ledyard, John O. (1984). “The Pure Theory of Large Two-Candidate Elections”, Public Choice, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 7-41.
Lindbeck, Assar y Weibull, Jorgen (1987). “Balanced Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition”, Public Choice, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 273-297.
Lizzeri, Alessandro y Persico, Nicola (2001). “The Problem of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 225-239.
Mckelvey, Richard (1976). “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 472-82.
Mckelvey, Richard (1979). “General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 1085-1111.
Meltzer, Allan H. y Richard, Scott F. (1981). “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 914-927.
Merrill, Samuel y Grofman, Bernard (1999). A Unified Theory of Voting, Cambridge University Press.
Moreno, Carlos L. (2008). Democracia Electoral y Calidad Gubernativa. El Desempeño de los Gobiernos Municipales en México, Guadalajara, ITESO/ UIA-Puebla/UIA-Torreón.
Myerson, Roger (1993a). “Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption: A Game Theoretic Analysis”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 118-132.
Myerson, Roger (1993b). “Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities Under Alternative Electoral Systems”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 856-869.
Myerson, Roger (1995). “Analysis of Democratic Institutions: Structure, Conduct and Performance”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 77-89.
Niskanen, William A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Aldine-Ahterton.
Perotti, Roberto (1992). “Income Distribution, Politics and Growth”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 311-316.
Perotti, Roberto (1993). “Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution and Growth”, The Review of Economics Studies, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 755-766.
Perotti, Roberto (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy: What the Data Say”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 149-187.
Persson, Torsten y Tabellini, Guido (1991). “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence”, Discussion Paper, No. 581, Center for Economic Policy Research (London).
Persson, Torsten y Tabellini, Guido (1992). “Growth, distribution and politics” European Economic Review, Vol. 36, No. 2-3, pp. 593-602.
Persson, Torsten y Tabellini, Guido (1994). “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 600-621.
Persson, Torsten; Roland, Gerard y Tabellini, Guido (1997), “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability”, Quarterly journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No. 4, pp. 1163-1202.
Plott, Charles R. (1967). “A Notion of Equilibrium and Its Possibility Under Majority Rule”, American Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 787-806.
Ponzio, Carlos A. (1995), “El votante mediano y el sector público en México, 1925-1976”, Ensayos, Vol. XIV, No. 1, pp. 1-20.
Ponzio, Carlos A. (1996), “Tres interpretaciones sobre el tamaño del sector público mexicano, 1925-1976”, Economía Mexicana, Nueva Época, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 5-35.
Ríos-Rull, José Víctor y Krusell, Per (1999), “On the Size of U.S. Government: Political Economy in the Neoclassical Growth Model”, American Economic Association, Vol. 89, No. 5, pp. 1156-1181.
Robinson, James A. y Thierry Verdier (2002), “The Political Economy of Clientelism”, Discussion Paper, No. 3205, Center of Economic Policy Research.
Romer, Thomas y Rosenthal, Howard (1978), “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo”, Public Choice, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 27-44.
Romer, Thomas y Rosenthal, Howard (1979), “Bureaucrats vs. Voters; On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct Democracy”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 563-87.
Saint-Paul, Gilles y Verdier, Thierry. (1993), “Education, Democracy and Growth”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 399-407.
Saint-Paul, Gilles and Verdier, Thierry (1996), “Inequality, Redistribution and Growth: A challenge to the Conventional Political Economy Approach”, European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 719-728.
Shepsle, Kenneth (1979), “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 27-59.
Shleifer, Andrei y Vishny, Robert (1999), The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures, Cambridge University Press.
Stigler, George J. (1971), “The theory of economic regulation”, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 3-21.
Stigler, George J. (1972), “Economic Competition and Political Competition”, Public Choice, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 91-106.
Svensson, Jakob (1997), “The Control of Public Policy: Electoral Competition, Polarization and Primary Elections”, The World Bank, mimeo.
Tullock, Gordon (1981), “Why so Much Stability?”, Public Choice, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 189-202.
Wantchekon, Leonard (2003), “Clientelism and Voting Behavior; Evidence from a Field Experiment in Beinin”, World Politics, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 399- 422.
Wittman, Donald (1989), “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1395-1424.
Wittman, Donald (1997), The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions are Efficient, Chicago. Chicago University Press.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Este sitio web, por Universidad de Antioquia, está licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License.
Los autores que publiquen en esta revista aceptan que conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con una Licencia de Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen su autoría y a la publicación original en esta revista.
Los autores pueden realizar acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, incluirla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un libro) siempre que sea con fines no comerciales y se reconozca de manera clara y explícita que el artículo ha sido originalmente publicado en esta revista.
Se permite y recomienda a los autores publicar sus artículos en Internet (por ejemplo, en páginas institucionales o personales), ya que puede conducir a intercambios provechosos y a una mayor difusión y citación de los trabajos publicados.
