Individuos y estadios: una propuesta formal desde la información aspectual de los predicados

Mario Casado Mancebo

doi:10.17533/udea.lyl.n76a03

Authors

Mario Casado Mancebo Complutense University of Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n76a03

Keywords:

individual level predicates, stage level predicates, lexis-syntax predicates, predication theory, aspectual structure

Abstract

This paper offers a critical theoretical review of the categories of individual and stage and the different approaches that have been given to both categories from different areas of grammar. Then, a formal analysis of the two types of preaching is proposed from the perspective of the aspectual information of the predicates from the information they consist of when leaving the lexicon, to conclude that the «lexical coercion» is an aspectual coercion that would insert an aspect syntagma with a spatio-temporal variable, interfering with the functional structure of the referential structures of preaching.

|Abstract

= 300 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 0 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 300 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mario Casado Mancebo, Complutense University of Madrid

Graduated in Spanish Language and Literature and postgraduate in Spanish Language Research. He devotes his research to the fields of phonology, syntax and interface between the two. His early research has focused on phonic studies and his didactics. Last published: Occlusive, fricative a century of continuous struggle, Panhysponic Studies: theoretical and applied linguistics (2018); Phonetics in the high school classroom. A proposal based on the new analysis models, Didacticae, (in press). Currently, he elaborates his doctoral thesis on the relationships between perceptual phonology, prosody and syntax. Institutional affiliation: Complutense University of Madrid (Spain).

References

Bosque, I., y Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.

Brucart, J. M., y Hernanz, M. L. (2015). Las posiciones sintácticas. En Gallego, Á. J. (Ed.), Perspectivas de sintaxis formal (pp. 33-104). Madrid: Akal.

Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English (Tesis doctoral). University of Massachussets, Amherst.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. En Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge (Massachusetts): The M.I.T. Press.

Davidson, D. (1967). The Logical Form of Action Sentences. En Rescher, N. (Ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (pp. 81-95). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Eguren, L. J., y Fernández Soriano, O. (2004). Introducción a una sintaxis minimista. Madrid: Gredos.

Escandell Vidal, M. V., y Leonetti, M. (2002). Coercion and the Stage/Individual distinction, en Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (Ed.), From Words to Discourse (pp. 159-179). Nueva York: Elsevier.

Fábregas, A. (2012). A Guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, Problems and Proposals. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1(2), 1-71.

Fábregas, A. (2015). On the Locative Reading of Dimensional Adjectives and the Internal Syntax of Estar. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 7(1), 3–41.

Frege, G. (1952). On Sense and Reference, en Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Blackwell.

Hale, K., y Keyser, S. J. (1987). A View from the Middle. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The M.I.T.

Hale, K., y Keyser, S. J. (1988). Explaining and Constraining the English Middle. Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect. Cambridge (Massachusetts): The M.I.T.

Higginbotham, J. (1985). On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(4), 547-593.

Higginbotham, J. (1989). Elucidations of Meaning. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(4), 465-517.

Higginbotham, J., y Ramchand, G. (1996). The Stage-Level/Individual-Level Distinction and the Mapping Hypothesis. Manuscrito inédito, University of Oxford.

Horno Chéliz, M. del C. (2011). Argumento eventivo, estados léxicos y enunciados estativo. En Carrasco Gutiérrez, Á. (Ed.), Sobre estados y estatividad (pp. 63-82). München: Lincom Europa.

Husband, E. M. (2012). Stages of Individuals and the Composition of States. The Linguistic Review, 29(3), 375–395.

Kratzer, A. (1989). An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(5), 607-653.

Milsark, G. (1974). Existential Sentences in English. Tesis doctoral. M.I.T., Massachussets.

Parsons, T. (1985). Underlying Events in the Logical Analysis of English. En Lepore, E. y McLaughlin, B. P. (Eds.), Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 235-267). Oxford: Blackwell.

Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Schein, B. (1993). Plurals and Events. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.

Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and Times. En Linguistics in Philosophy (pp. 235-267). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.