Evolution Analysis of Agreement Errors in Four Italian Learners of Spanish L2 Using Complex Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n79a10Keywords:
Spanish as a Foreign Language, error analysis, nominal agreement, complex networks, pluralAbstract
In the following observational case study, some influencing factors were identified in the production of plural
agreement in four Italian learners of Spanish as a foreign language (ELE). To do this, a longitudinal data corpus was created from a set of oral interviews and complex networks were built in which each word / node had a link with another if an erroneous concordance relationship was found between them. In addition, the temporal statistical effects were examined in networks with cumulative errors and some factors were found as statistically significant.
Downloads
References
Alarcón, I. (2011). Spanish Grammatical Gender Under Complete and Incomplete Acquisition: Early and Late Bilinguals’ Linguistic Behavior Within the Noun Phrase. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 332-350.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2008). Acquisition of the Spanish Plural by French L1 Speakers: The Role of Transfer. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The Role of Features in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 270-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. & White, L. (2002). The Second Language Acquisition of Spanish DPs: The Status of Grammatical Features. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & J. Muñoz Liceras (Eds.), The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax: The L1/L2 Connection (pp. 153-178). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Corbett, G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, C. & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A Program for Deriving Orthographic and Phonological Neighborhood Statistics and Other Psycholinguistic Indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 665-671.
Enders, C. (2010). Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Español-Echevarría, M. & Prévost, P. (2004). Acquiring Number Specification on L2 Spanish Quantifiers: Evidence Against the Rich Agreement Hypothesis. En J. Van Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (pp. 151-162). Utrecht: LOT.
Fernández-García, M. (1999). Patterns of Gender Agreement in the Speech of Second Language Learners. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 3-15). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Foote, R. (2015). The Production of Gender Agreement in Native and L2 Spanish: The Role of Morphophonological Form. Second Language Research, 31, 343-373.
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or Syntactic Deficit in Near-native Speakers? An Assessment of Some Current Proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213-247.
Muñoz Liceras, J., Díaz Rodríguez, L., & Mongeon, C. (2000). N-drop and Determiners in Native and Nonnative Spanish: More on the Role of Morphology in the Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. In R. P. Leow & C. Sanz (Eds.), Current Research on the Acquisition of Spanish (pp. 67-96). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Mac Whinney, B. (2020). The Childes Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Part 1 & 2. Electronic Edition. https://talkbank.org/manuals
Montrul, S., Foote, R. & Perpiñan, S. (2008). Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503-553.
Nerbonne, J., Van Ommen, S., Gooskens, C. y Wieling, M. (2013). Measuring Socially Motivated Pronunciation Differences. In L. Borin & A. Saxena (Eds.), Approaches to Measuring Linguistic Differences (pp. 107-140). De Gruyter Mouton.
Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Oakes, M. P. (1998). Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
Peña, D. (2002). Análisis de Datos Multivariantes. Madrid: Mc Graw Hill.
Ripley, R., Snijders, T., Boda, Z., Voros, A., & Preciado, P. (2018). Manual for Siena Version 4.0; R Package Version 1.2-12. https://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSiena/
Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. & Raftery, A. (2016). Mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models. The R Journal, 8(1), 205-233.
Snijders, T. (1996). Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for Network Change. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 149-176.
Snijders, T., Steglich, C. & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the Co-evolution of Networks and Behavior. In K. Van Montfort, J. Oud & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related sciences (pp.41-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Snijders, T., Van de Bunt, G. & Steglich, C. (2010). Introduction to Stochastic Actor-Based Models for Network Dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44-60.
Van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1-67.
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y. (2004). Gender and Number Agreement in Nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 105-133.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lingüística y Literatura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons by-nc-sa
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
1. The journal is the owner of the copyright of the articles, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows third parties to share the work provided its author is indicated and its first publication in this journal.
2. The authors may adopt other agreements of non-exclusive license of distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.