Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical endodontic management of post-treatment periapical disease

Authors

  • Claudia C. García-Guerrero Universidad Nacional de Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-6338
  • Diana Carolina Lara-Rodríguez Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Lina María García-Serrano Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v30n2a8

Keywords:

Apicectomy, Endodontics, Clinical Practice guidelines as subject, Evidence-based dentistry, Periapical periodontitis, Periapical tissue

Abstract

Introduction: in Colombia, persisting post-endodontic disease has been reported by up to 45%, validating the use of secondary alternative therapies, like endodontic microsurgery (EM). The aim of this study was to systematically—and with reliable scientific evidence—develop de Novo Clinical Practice Guidelines for the surgical endodontic management of post-treatment periapical disease (PPD), with more accurate recommendations for therapeutic decisions and preferences consulted with both practitioners and patients. Method: the guidelines developers team identified EM as a topic in the literature and established the scope, objective, questions, and outcomes, which were analyzed using the scientific evidence reported in secondary or primary clinical studies. A first screening identified titles and abstracts for each question asked. The validity of the selected studies was quantified with tools like AMSTAR or SIGN. Finally, the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence were confirmed with GRADE. Results: concepts like PPD, EM indication, use of local anesthetics, antibiotics and presurgical anti-inflammatory drugs, effect of magnification, implementation of cone beam computed tomography, hemostasis, retrograde filling, and control time were integrated, supporting each topic with relevant evidence, experts’ recommendations, and even good practice points. Conclusions: this document is considered a tool with sufficient evidence for clinical decision-making in EM.

|Abstract
= 1017 veces | FIGURAS (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | PDF
= 402 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Claudia C. García-Guerrero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDS, Endodontics Specialist, MSc in Dentistry. Grupo de investigación INVENDO, Facultad de Odontología, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas y Medicina Oral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá DC

Diana Carolina Lara-Rodríguez, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDS, Endodontics Specialist, MSc in Dentistry. Grupo de investigación INVENDO, Facultad de Odontología, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas y Medicina Oral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá

Lina María García-Serrano, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia

DDS, Endodontics Specialist, Grupo de investigación INVENDO, Facultad de Odontología, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas y Medicina Oral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá DC.

References

Siqueira JF Jr, Rôcas IN, Debelian G, Carmo FL, Paiva SS, Alves FR et al. Profiling of root canal bacterial communities associated with chronic apical periodontitis from Brazilian and Norwegian subjects. J Endod. 2008; 34(12): 1457-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.037

Hülsmann M. Epidemiology of post-treatment disease. Endod topics. 2016; 34: 42–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12096

Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod. 2013; 39(3): 332-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044

Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod. 2006; 32(7): 602-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010

von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hänni S, Friedman. Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2012; 38(5): 570-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.002

Colombia. Plan obligatorio de salud POS. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud y la Protección Social, 2019

Sistema Nacional de Salud. Biblioteca de Guías de práctica clínica del sistema nacional de salud [Internet]; 2009. Available in: http://portal.guiasalud.es/emanuales/elaboracion/documento/Manual%20

metodologico%20-%20Elaboracion%20GPC%20en%20el%2

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London [Internet]; 2009. Available from: www.nice.org.uk

Evans G, Bishop K, Renton T. Guidelines for surgical endodontics. Faculty of dental surgery. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2012

Elaboración de guías de práctica clínica en el sistema nacional de salud: manual metodológico [Internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2007. Available in: http://www.madrid.org/bvirtual/BVCM017418.pdf

Colombia. Ministerio de Salud, COLCIENCIAS. Guía metodológica para la elaboración de guías de práctica clínica con evaluación económica en el sistema general de seguridad social en salud colombiano: versión completa final. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; 2013

Schünemann H, Brozek J, Oxman AE. GRADE handbook for grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Version 3.2. [Internet]. The GRADE Working Group; 2009. Available in: http://www.cc-ims.net/gradepro

Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells G a, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol.

; 15: 7-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10

SIGN. Sign 50: a guideline developer’s handbook [Internet]. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2011. p. 111. Available in: www.sign.ac.uk

Friedman SJ. Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post-treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure). Endod Topics. 2002; 1(1): 54-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.10105.x

Abbott, P. Diagnosis and management planning for root-filled teeth with persisting or new apical pathosis. Endod Topics. 2011; 19: 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2010.00252.x

Yu VS, Khin LW, Hsu CS, Yee R, Messer HH. Risk score algorithm for treatment of persistent apical periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93(11): 1076-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514549559

Martínez P, Marín DJ, Suárez LC, García CC. Signos y síntomas clínicos predictores de cicatrización apical 12 meses después de microcirugía endodóntica. Univ Odontol. 2015; 34(73): 87-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uo34-73

Kirkevang L-L, Wenzel A. Risk indicators for apical periodontitis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003; 3(1): 59-67

Weissman J, Johnson J, Anderson M, Hollender L, Huson T, Paranjpe A et al. Association between the presence of apical periodontitis and clinical symptoms in endodontic patients using cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs. J Endod. 2015; 41(11): 1824-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.004

Levin LG, Law AS, Holland GR, Abbott PV, Roda RS. Identify and define all diagnostic terms for pulpal health and disease states. J Endod. 2009; 35(12): 1645-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.032

Klausen B, Helbo M, Dabelsteen E. A differential diagnostic approach to the symptomatology of acute dental pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59(3): 297-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(85)90170-7

Venskutonis T, Daugela P, Strazdas M, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography on periapical radiolucency detection in endodontically treated teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014; 5(2): e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2014.5201

Fernandez R, Cadavid D, Zapata S, Alvarez L, Restrepo F. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. J Endod. 2013; 39(9): 1097-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.002

Low K, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod. 2008; 34(5): 557-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.022

Abella F, Patel S, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercadé M, Bueno R, Roig M. Evaluating the periapical status of teeth with irreversible pulpitis by using cone-beam computed tomography scanning and periapical radiographs. J Endod. 2012; 38(12): 1588-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.003

Metska M, Parsa A, Aartman I, Wesselink P, Rifat Ozok A. Volumetric changes in apical radiolucencies of endodontically treated teeth assessed by cone-beam computed tomography 1 year after orthograde

retreatment. J Endod. 2013; 39(12): 1504-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.034

Nair PN, Pajarola G, Schroeder HE. Types and incidence of human periapical lesions obtained with extracted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 81(1): 93-102

Nair PN. New perspectives on radicular cysts: do they heal? Int Endod J. 1998; 31(3): 155-60

Nair PN. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004; 15(6): 348-81

Mozayeni MA, Asnaashari M, Modaresi SJ. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of procedural accidents and errors during root canal therapy. Iran Endod J. 2006; 1(3): 97-100

Haji-Hassani N, Bakhshi M, Shahabi S. Frequency of iatrogenic errors through root canal treatment procedure in 1335 charts of dental patients. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7(Suppl 1): 14-7

Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Dilaceration: review of an endodontic challenge. J Endod. 2007; 33(9): 1025-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 23

Kim S, Pecora G, Rubinstein R. Comparison of traditional and microsurgery in endodontics. In: Color atlas of microsurgery in endodontics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2001. 5-11

Gil-García CD, Quijano-Guauque SB, Marín-Zuluaga D, Marín-Zuluaga DJ, García Guerrero CC. Remanente de la obturación endodóntica en dientes restaurados con retenedor intra-radicular y su relación con la condición periapical post-tratamiento. Acta Odontol Col. 2016; 6(2): 31-44.

Kung, J, McDonagh M, Sedgley CM. Does articaine provide an advantage over lidocaine in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015; 41(11): 1784-94.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.001

Kim S. Principles of endodontic microsurgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41(3): 481-97

Rubinstein RA, Kim S. Short-term observation of the results of endodontic surgery with the use of a surgical operation microscope and super-EBA as root-end filling material. J Endod. 1999; 25(1): 43-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80398-7

Carr GB. Microscope in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1992; 20(11): 55-61

Carr GB. Surgical endodontics. In: Cohen S, Burns R editor. Pathways of the pulp, 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1994. 531

Pecora G, Andreana S. Use of dental operating microscope in endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 75(6): 751-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90435-7

Setzer FC, Kohli MR, Shah SB, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the Literature - Part 2: comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of highermagnification. J Endod. 2012; 38(1): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.021

Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S. Endodontic therapy using magnification devices: a systematic review. J Dent. 2010; 38(4): 269-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.008

Von Arx T, Peñarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a metaanalysis. J Endod. 2010; 36(6): 957-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.026

Menendez-Nieto I, Cervera-Ballester J, Maestre-Ferrín L, Blaya.Tárraga J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, PeñarrochaDiago M. Hemostatic agents in periapical surgery: a randomized study of gauze impregnated in epinephrine versus aluminum chloride. J Endod. 2016; 42(11): 1583-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.005

Jang Y, Kim H, Roh BD, Kim E. Biologic response of local hemostatic agents used in endodontic microsurgery. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39(2): 79-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.79

Clé-Ovejero A, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Haemostatic agents in apical surgery. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016; 21(5): e652-7. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4317%2Fmedoral.21109

Kim S, Song M, Shin SJ, Kim E. A randomized controlled study of mineral trioxide aggregate and super ethoxybenzoic acid as root-end filling materials in endodontic microsurgery: long-term outcomes. J Endod.

; 42(7): 997-1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.008

Zhou W, Zheng Q, Tan X, Song D, Zhang L, Huang D. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and iRoot BP plus root repair material as root-end filling materials in endodontic microsurgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Endod. 2017; 43(1): 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.010

Shinbori, N, Grama AM, Patel Y, Woodmansey K, He J. Clinical outcome of endodontic microsurgery that uses endoSequence BC root repair material as the root-end filling material. J Endod. 2015; 41(5): 607-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.12.028

Karring T. Regenerative periodontal therapy. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2000; 2(4): 101- 9

Von Arx T, Alsaeed M: The use of regenerative techniques in apical surgery: a literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2011; 23(3): 113-27. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sdentj.2011.02.004

Bottino MC, Thomas V, Schmidt G, Vohra YK, Chu TM, Kowolik MJ et al. Recent advances in the development of GTR/GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration—a materials perspective. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(7): 703-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022

Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2011; 37(8): 1039–45.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.016

Deng: Y, Zhu: X, Yang: J, Jiang: H, Yan: P, The effect of regeneration techniques on periapical surgery with different protocols for different lesion types: a meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74(2): 239-46.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.007

Lindeboom JAH, Frenken JWH, Valkenburg P, van den Akker HP. The role of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic administration in periapical endodontic surgery: a randomized, prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J. 2005; 38(12): 877-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01030.x

Kvist T, Reit C. Postoperative discomfort associated with surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000; 16(2): 71-4

Vanegas H, Schaible HG. Prostaglandins and cyclooxygenases in the spinal cord. Prog Neurobiol. 2001; 64(4): 327-63

Aznar-Arasa L, Harutunian K, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E, GayEscoda C. Effect of preoperative ibuprofen on pain and swelling after lower third molar removal: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Oral

Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41(8): 1005-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.028

Suebnukarn S, Rhienmora P, Haddawy P. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and virtual reality simulation for pre-surgical practice in endodontic microsurgery. Int. Endod J. 2012; 45(7): 627-32. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02018.x

Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod. 2008; 34(1): 87-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.016

Leonardi Dutra K, Haas L, Porporatti AL, Flores-Mir C, Nascimento Santos J, Mezzomo LA et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional radiography on apical periodontitis:

a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2016; 42(3): 356-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.015

Grondahl HG, Huumonen S. Radiographic manifestations of periapical inflammatory lesions. Endod Topics. 2004; 8: 55-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00082.x

García GCC, Quijano GS, Molano N, Pineda GA, Nino B JL, Marín ZDJ. Predictors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. G ital endod. 2017; 31(1): 2-13. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2017.03.001

Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Suresh A, Veettil SK, Bhatia S, Setzer FC. Efficacy of local anaesthetic solutions on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic

review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int Endod J. 2019; 52(6): 779-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13072

Shahi S, Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Ghasemi N, Ahmadi F. Success rate of 3 injection methods with articaine for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a CONSORT randomized double-blind

clinical trial. J Endod. 2018; 44(10): 1462-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.010

Colombia. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos – INVIMA. Resolución No. 2017044599 de 23 de octubre de 2017: por la cual se concede un

registro sanitario. Bogotá, Ministerio de Salud; 2017.

Germack M, Sedgley CM, Sabbah W, Whitten B. Antibiotic use in 2016 by members of the American Association of Endodontists: report of a national survey. J Endod. 2017; 43(10): 1615-22. DOI: https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.009

Downloads

Published

2019-10-10

How to Cite

García-Guerrero, C. C., Lara-Rodríguez, D. C., & García-Serrano, L. M. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical endodontic management of post-treatment periapical disease. Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 30(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v30n2a8