Guidelines for clinical diagnosis of pulp and periapical pathologies. adapted and updated from the “Consensus conference recommended diagnostic terminology” published by the American Association of Endodontists (2009)

Authors

  • Claudia C. García-Guerrero Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Talía Y. Marroquín-Peñaloza Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Keywords:

Dental pulp diseases, Diagnosis, Sensitivity and specificity, X-rays, Periapical diseases, Guidelines for clinical practice as search terms

Abstract


Introduction: accurate diagnosis in endodontics leads to the selection of adequate endodontic treatment. The terms used to name each pathology must be associated to particular clinical conditions. The standardization of diagnostic terminology in endodontics has been widely discussed in the academic and clinical fields. The objective of this study was to adapt and update the Guidelines for clinical diagnosis of pulp and periapical pathologies under the parameters of the ADAPTE methodology for circulation and socialization within the academic and professional communities. Methods: guidelines search was conducted in compiling agencies such as the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), USA National Center of Guidelines, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Guidelines were selected with the AGREE II tool, considering AAE’s document “Consensus Conference Recommended Diagnostic Terminology” (2009) as “recommendable”, and initiating the adaptation process with ADAPTE. The source databases include Cochrane, PubMed, Tripdatabase, with verifiable key words in DeCS and MeSH. Literature assessment followed the parameters of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and the method of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Results: adaptation and update of the Guidelines for clinical diagnosis of pulp and periapical disease. Conclusions: terminology standardization will allow identifying pulp tissue and periapical conditions. The development of guidelines for clinical practice must be supported on scientific evidence and on agreed methodologies.

|Abstract
= 5382 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 4047 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Claudia C. García-Guerrero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDM, Endodontics Specialist, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Assistant Professor, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Talía Y. Marroquín-Peñaloza, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

DDM, Endodontics Specialist, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

References

European Society of Endodontology. Accreditation of postgraduate specialty training programmes in endodontology. Minimum criteria for training specialists in endodontology within Europe. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 725-737.

Newton CW, Hoen MM, Goodis HE, Johnson BR, McClanahan SB. Identify and determine the metrics, hierarchy, and predictive value of all the parameters and/or methods used during endodontic diagnosis. J Endod 2009; 35(12): 1635-1644.

Sigurdsson A. Pulpal diagnosis. Endodontic Topics 2003; 5(1): 12-25.

Grupo de trabajo sobre GPC. Elaboración de guías de práctica clínica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Manual metodológico. Madrid: Plan Nacional para el SNS del MSC. Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud-I+CS; 2007.

Marzo Castillejo M, Viana-Zulaica C. Calidad de la evidencia y grados de recomendación. Revista Guías Práctica Clínica [internet] 2007; 1(6) Supl: 1-14 [consultado 2012 Nov 15]. Disponible en: http://www.fisterra.com/guias2/fmc/sintesis.pdf

Oliveros HR. Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación en la elaboración de guías de práctica clínica. En: Manual de investigación biomédica clínica. Bogotá: Nomos, Orden Hospitalaria San Juan de Dios, Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael; 2009. p. 111-118.

Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Capítulo I Artículo 4o. Guía de atención. En: resolución número 00412 DE 2000 Febrero 25. Santa Fe de Bogotá: ElMinisterio; 2000.

Colombia. Ministerio de la Protección Social, Programa de Apoyo a la Reforma de Salud/PARS. Norma técnica para la protección específica de la caries y la enfermedad gingival. En: Guías de promoción de la salud y prevención de enfermedades en la salud pública, Programa de Apoyo a la Reforma de Salud. Guía 7: 385-413. [Internet] Bogotá: Scripto; 2007. [Consultado 2013 Ene 18]. Disponible en: http://www.nacer.udea.edu.co/pdf/libros/guiamps/guias07.pdf

Glickman GN, Bakland LK, Fouad AF, Hargreaves KM, Schwartz SA. Diagnostic terminology: report of an online survey. J Endod 2009; 32(12): 1625-1633.

ADAPTE. Guideline adaptation: a resource toolkit. [Internet]; 2010 [Consultado 2013 Jul 12]. Disponible en: http://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/adaptation/adapte-resource-toolkit-guideline-adaptation-2-0.pdf

Colombia. Bogotá. Secretaria Distrital de Salud. Guía de práctica clínica en salud oral. patología pulpar y periapical. [Internet]. Bogotá: La Secretaría; 2009 [Consultado 2010 Mar 17] Disponible en: http://acfo.edu.co/educacion/pdf/Guias/guia_enf_pulpar_y_periapical.pdf

Paik S, Sechrist C, Torabinejad M. Levels of evidence for the outcome of endodontic Retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30(11): 745-750.

De Gutiérrez I, González C. ¿Cómo localizar GPC? [Internet]. [Consultado 2012 Feb 10]. Disponible en: http://www.fisterra.com/bd/upload/localizar.pdf

National Guideline Clearinghouse. Health partners dental group guideline for diagnosing and treating endodontic emergencies [Internet]. [Consultado 2011 Oct 7]. Disponible en: http://www.guideline.gov/faq.aspx

Health Information and Quality Authority. Draft national quality assurance criteria for clinical guidelines. [Internet]. [Consultado 2010 Nov 3]. Disponible en: http://www.hiqa.ie/press-release/2011-10-26-national-quality-assurance-criteria-clinical-guidelines

Trip Database [Internet]. [Consultado 2012 Feb 8]. Disponible en: http://www.tripdatabase.com/search?category-id=&criteria=++DIAGNOSIS+ENDODONTICS+

Consorcio AGREE. Instrumento para la evaluación de guías de práctica clínica. [Internet]. [Consultado 2011 Feb 8]. Disponible en: http://www.guiasalud.es/contenidos/documentos/Guias_Practica_Clinica/Spanish-AGREE-II.pdf

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Grupo de Evaluación de Tecnologías y Políticas en Salud (UN GETS). Manual metodológico para la elaboración y adaptación de guías de práctica clínica, basados en la evidencia. Capítulo 2. Adaptación de guías de práctica clínica. [Internet]. [Consultado 2011 Feb 12]. Disponible en http://www.gets.unal.edu.co/cap2.pdf

Grupo de Expertos, Comité de Vacunación del Adulto Asociación Colombiana de Infectología. Guía de práctica clínica para la vacunación del adolescente y del adulto en Colombia 2012. Infectio 2012; 16(S2): 5-55.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Ytter YF, Coello PA et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. [Internet]. [Consultado 2010 Oct 5]. Disponible en: http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/publications/GRADE-1_BMJ2008.pdf

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. A Guideline developer’s handbook. [internet] Edimburgo: SIGN; 2001 [Consultado 2010 Oct 2] Disponible en: http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sign/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guidelines development methods. Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. [Internet]. [Consultado 2010 Oct 5]. Disponible en: http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/GDM_Allchapters_0305.pdf

Marroquín T, García C. Diagnósticos en endodoncia adaptación y actualización. Facultad de Odontología Universidad Nacional de Colombia.[ I n t e r n e t ] . [Consultado 2010 Oct 5]. Disponible en: http://www.odontologia.unal.edu.co/posgrados/pos_endodoncia.php

Levin LG, Law AS, Holland GR, Abbott PV, Roda RS. Identify and define all diagnostic terms for pulpal health and disease states. J Endod 2009; 35(12):1645-1657.

Marroquín T, García C. Guías de diagnóstico clínico en endodoncia adaptación para la facultad de odontología de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. [Tesis para optar al título de especialista en Endodoncia] Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Odontología; 2012.

Levin LG. Pulp and periradicular testing. J Endod 2013; 39(3S): S13-S19.

Huumonen S, Ørstavik D. Radiological aspects of apical periodontitis. Endodontic Topics 2002; 1: 3-25.

Colombia. Bogotá. Secretaría Distrital de Salud. Dirección de Planeación y Sistemas Análisis, Programación y Evaluación, Grupo de Información Lineamiento para diligenciamiento de Rips en odontología. [Internet] [Consultado 2013 Feb 18]. Disponible en: http://www.saludcapital.gov.co/Publicaciones/Informaci%C3%B3n%20de%20prestaci%C3%B3n%20de%20servicios%20(RIPS)/Memorias%20Capacitaciones/RIPS%20Independientes%2016%20mayo%202012/Lineamiento_codificaci%C3%B3nRIPS_Salud_Oral.pdf

World Health Organization. Application of the international classification of diseases to dentistry and stomatology. 3.a ed. Geneva: WHO; 1995.

Gopikrishna V,Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. Comparison of electrical, thermal, and pulse oximetry methods for assessing pulp vitality in recently traumatized teeth. J Endod 2007; 33(5): 531-535.

Petersson K, Söderström C, Kiani-Anaraki M, Lévy G. Evaluation of the ability of thermal and electrical tests to register pulp vitality. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15(3): 127-131.

Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 738-762.

Gutmann JL, Lovdahl PE. Problem solving in prevention, identification endodontics, and Management, 5.a ed. Maryland Heights: Elsevier Mosby; 2011.

Pitt Ford TR, Patel S. Technical equipment for assessment of dental pulp status. Endodontic Topics 2004; 7: 2-13.

Mejàre IA, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T et al. Diagnosis of the condition of the dental pulp: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 597-613.

Iqbal M, Kim S, Yoon F. An investigation into differential diagnosis of pulp and periapical pain: a penn endo database study. J Endod 2007; 33(5): 548-551.

Cisneros-Cabello R, Segura-Egea JJ. Relationship of patient complaints and signs to histopathologic diagnosis of pulpal condition. Aust Endod J 2005; 31(1): 24-27.

Abbott PV, Yu C. A clinical classification of the status of the pulp and the root canal system. Aust Den J 2007; 52(1 Suppl): S17-S31.

Gopikrishna V, Pradeep G, Venkateshbabu N. Assessment of pulp vitality: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009; 19: 3-15.

Lin J, Chandler NP. Electric pulp testing: a review. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 365-374.

Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F. Internal root resorption: a review. J Endod 2010; 36(7): 1107-1121.

Pecora EC, Saquy MD, Souza M. Clinical aspects of pulpal-periodontal lesions. Aust Endod J 2002; 26: 82-85.

Estrela C, Guedes OA, Silva JA, Leles CR, Estrela CR, Pécora JD. Diagnostic and clinical factors associated with pulpal and periapical pain. Braz Dent J 2011; 22(4): 306-311.

Seltzer S. Classification of pulpal pathosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34(2): 269-287.

McCabel PS, Dummer PM. Pulp canal obliteration: an endodontic pulp canal obliteration: an endodontic diagnosis and treatment challenge. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 177-197.

Jacobsen I, Kerekes K. Long-term prognosis of traumatized permanent anterior teeth showing calcifying processes in the pulp cavity. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85(7):588-598.

Jafarzadeh H, Udoye CI, Kinoshita J. The application of tooth temperature measurement in endodontic diagnosis: a review. J Endod 2008; 34(12): 1435-1440.

Gutmann JL, Baumgartner JC, Gluskin AH, Hartwell GR, Walton RE. Identify and define all diagnostic terms for periapical/periradicular health and disease states. J Endod 2009; 35(12): 1658-1674 l.

Abbott PV. Classification, diagnosis and clinical manifestations of apical periodontitis. Endodontic Topics 2004; 8: 36-54.

Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G. Histologic features of apical periodontitis in human biopsies. Endodontic Topics 2004; 8: 68-87.

Sutherland S, Matthews DC, Basrani B. Emergency management of acute apical periodontitis in the permanent dentition: a systematic review of the literature. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69(3): 160-160l.

Petersson A, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T et al. Radiological diagnosis of periapical bone tissue lesions in endodontics: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 783-801.

Agarwal P, Agarwal A. Pulp - dead or alive? Indian J Dent Adv 2011; 3(4): 684-686.

Rushton VE, Qualtrough AJ, Al-Masserah Y, Rushton MN. The influence of coronal tooth tissue in the diagnosis of apical pathosis. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 603-608.

De Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod 2009; 35(7): 1009-1012.

Tyndall DA, Kohltfarber H. Application of cone beam volumetric tomography in endodontics. Aust Dent J 2012; 57 Suppl 1: 72-81.

Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, Azevedo B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in detecting small periapical lesions. J Endod 2012; 38(7): 965-970.

Published

2015-04-20

How to Cite

García-Guerrero, C. C., & Marroquín-Peñaloza, T. Y. (2015). Guidelines for clinical diagnosis of pulp and periapical pathologies. adapted and updated from the “Consensus conference recommended diagnostic terminology” published by the American Association of Endodontists (2009). Revista Facultad De Odontología Universidad De Antioquia, 26(2), 398–424. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/14776