Association between genetic evaluation and show-ring judging for dairy and beef cattle


  • Rodolfo Ramírez Valverde Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo
  • Gustavo Ramírez Valverde
  • Rafael Núñez Domínguez
  • Rafael A Delgadillo Zapata
  • Miguel Hernández León



auction show, expected progeny difference, predicted transmitted abilities, rankit transformation


a concern for breeders is whether an animal ranking based on genetic evaluations is similar to that obtained from show-ring judging. Objective: to determine the association between rankings for Braunvieh (BR) and Brown Swiss (BS) cattle of Mexico based on show-ring judging and their respective expected progeny differences (EPDs) or predicted transmitted abilities (PTAs). Methods: ranking values from judging were transformed using the rankit transformation. For each breed, Pearson correlation analyses were performed between the transformed rank values of the animals obtained from judging at the show-ring and their EPD or PTA values. Results: using the complete databases, in both breeds the correlation coefficient estimates were low (< 0.18) but different from zero   (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient considering PTAs for milk yield in BS was slightly higher than those obtained for any EPD for growth traits in BR. Correlations in adult animals (0.18 to 0.23) were different from zero (p < 0.05) and higher than those of young animals or calves, while those within males or females were similar. Correlations within years of judging in the show-ring were variable and did not indicate any specific trend. Conclusions: show-ring rank results are associated with genetic evaluation of animals, although the magnitude is low. Selection of breeding animals based on show-ring judgment could be used as a complementary tool to genetic evaluation.

= 814 veces | PDF
= 120 veces| | HTML
= 23 veces|


Download data is not yet available.


Beasley TM, Erickson S, Allison DB. Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited? Behav Genet 2009; 39:580-95.Boldman KG, Kriese LA, Van Vleck LD, Van Tasell CP, Kachman SD. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances [Draft]. USDA, ARS; 1995.Boligon AA, Mercadante MEZ, Albuquerque LG. Genetic associations of conformation, finishing precocity and muscling visual scores with mature weight in Nelore cattle. Livest Sci 2011; 135:238-43. Boostrom DR, Slanger WD, Moore BL. Heritability and repeatability of Hereford show-ring placing and associated correlations with individual performance measurements and expected progeny differences. J Anim Sci 1986; 63:1101-7.Chvosta J, Rucker RR, Watts MJ. Transaction costs and cattle marketing: the information content of seller-provided presale data at bull auctions. Amer J Agr Econ 2001; 83:286-301.Da Gama MPM, Araújo Neto FR, De Oliveira HN, Fernandes AR, Vercesi Filho AE, El Faro L, Paz CCP. Genetic parameters for rank of dairy Gir cattle in agricultural shows using Thurstonian procedures. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Vancuover, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014.Estrada-León RJ, Magana JG, Segura-Correa JC. Genetic parameters for reproductive traits of Brown Swiss cows in the tropics of Mexico. J Anim Vet Adv 2008; 7:124-9.Simielli Filho EA, Mercadante MEZ, Silva JAV, Josahkian LA. Ranking of Nellore animals in cattle championships: genetic parameters and correlations with production traits. Genet Mol Res 2014; 13:5722-31.Guthrie LD, Majeskie JL. Dairy cattle judging teaches critical life skills. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80:1884-7.Madalena FE. Considerations on the management of animal genetic resources in Latin-America. EAAP/SLU/FAO/ICAR workshop on “Sustainable Management of Animal Genetic Resources: Linking Perspectives Globally”. Uppsala, Sweden, June 2, 2005.Madalena FE, Agyemang K, Cardellino RC, Jain GL. Genetic improvement in medium- to low-input systems of animal production. Experiences to date. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Montpellier, France, August 19-23, 2002.Mc Hugh N, Evans RD, Fahey AG, Berry DP. Animal muscularity and size are genetically correlated with animal live-weight and price. Livest Sci 2012; 144:11-9.

Paneto JCC, Bittar ER, Barbosa EF, Rocha CD, Val JE, Ferraudo ES, Lôbo RD. Causes of variation in the prices of Nelore elite cattle in Brazil. Cienc Rural 2009; 39:215-20.Rocha CD, Barbosa EF, Ferraudo AS, Filho WK, Bittar ER, Oliveira PCL, Paneto JCC. Production and reproduction genetic trends of the Nellore beef cattle selected through visual assessment in Brazil. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Belo Horizonte, Brazil, August 13-18, 2006.Saavedra Jiménez LA, Ramírez Valverde R, Núñez Domínguez R, García Muñiz JG, Lopez-Villalobos N, Ruiz-Flores A. Genotype by climate interaction in the genetic evaluation for growing traits of Braunvieh cattle in Mexico. Trop Anim Health Pro 2013; 45:1489-94.SAS. Statistical Analysis System User’s Guide (Release 9.2), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA; 2009.Schierenbeck S, König S, Simianer H. Genetic and environmental impact on auction prices for Holstein cows. Livest Sci 2009; 121:327-34. Vestal MK, Lusk JL, De Vuyst EA, Kropp JR. The value of genetic information to livestock buyers: a combined revealed stated preference approach. Agr Econ 2013; 44:337-47.




How to Cite

Ramírez Valverde R., Ramírez Valverde G., Núñez Domínguez R., Delgadillo Zapata, R. A., & Hernández León M. (2016). Association between genetic evaluation and show-ring judging for dairy and beef cattle. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 29(1), 25–32.



Original research articles

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.