Development of an electronic device for automatic and individualized monitoring of enteric methane emissions in dairy cows

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e358533

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, automatic monitoring, CH₄ emissions, computer vision, dairy cows, enteric methane, livestock management, MQ-4 gas sensor, YOLO model

Abstract

Background: Monitoring enteric methane (CH₄) emissions is crucial for identifying animals with lower emissions in selection programs and to measure the effectiveness of emission reduction strategies. Current methods are often expensive and complex, limiting their widespread application. Objective: This study aimed to develop and test a low-cost, automated [1]system for individualized monitoring of CH₄ emissions in dairy cows. Methods: The system comprises a CH₄ concentration measurement device based on the MQ-4 gas sensor, complemented by a 2 L/min airflow system, and an animal identification module utilizing artificial intelligence. The CH₄ data were wirelessly transmitted via an ESP8266 module to a laptop for storage. CH₄ concentrations were recorded three times per second, and precise timestamps were used to document cow entry and exit from the milking stall. For the animal identification module, video frames of 26 cows during milking were extracted and organized into individual folders for each cow. Four versions (s, n, m, and l) of the Yolov8 and Yolov10 models were fine-tuned and evaluated using a dataset divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Performance metrics included Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and Accuracy. The CH₄ concentration system was tested with 10 Holstein cows during their milking sessions. Results: The prototypes successfully measured and recorded CH₄ emissions from individual cows. Continuous recording allowed for detailed time-series graphs, showing fluctuations in emissions. Some cows exhibited highest average CH₄ emission level, demonstrating the device's ability to identify high-emitting individuals. Baseline CH₄ concentrations in the feeder area were stable across cows, ensuring accurate emission measurements. The identification module's comparative analysis highlighted the Yolov8s model as the optimal choice due to its balance between low latency (16.4 ms) and high performance, achieving perfect scores in precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy. Conclusions: The developed system effectively monitors CH₄ emissions in dairy cows, offering a practical and economical alternative to traditional methods. The use of low-cost sensors and advanced artificial intelligence enhances its potential for genetic improvement programs and sustainable livestock management practices.

|Abstract
= 31 veces | PDF
= 22 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

John-Fredy Ramirez-Agudelo, Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia – UdeA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Agrarias – GRICA, Calle 70 No. 52 – 21, Apartado aéreo 1226, Medellín, Colombia

Sebastian Bedoya-Mazo, Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia – UdeA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Agrarias – GRICA, Calle 70 No. 52 – 21, Apartado aéreo 1226, Medellín, Colombia.

Luisa-Fernanda Moreno-Pulgarín, Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia – UdeA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Agrarias – GRICA, Calle 70 No. 52 – 21, Apartado aéreo 1226, Medellín, Colombia

Jose-Fernando Guarin, Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia – UdeA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Agrarias – GRICA, Calle 70 No. 52 – 21, Apartado aéreo 1226, Medellín, Colombia.

References

Bäck H, May R, Naidu DS, Eikenberry S. Effect of methane mitigation on global temperature under a permafrost feedback. Glo Envi Chang Advan 2024; 2, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecadv.2024.100005

Bartlett JW, Frost C. Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultra Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5256

Bekele W, Guinguina A, Zegeye A, Simachew A, Ramin M. Contemporary methods of measuring and estimating methane emission from ruminants. Methane 2022; 1(2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane1020008

Chagunda, MGG, Ross D, Roberts DJ. On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows. Comput Electron Agric 2009; 68(2): 157-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.05.008

Devine CE, Devine SD. The contribution of agricultural methane from ruminants and plants to global warming (4588).

Encyclo of Meat Sci 2024; 3: 702-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85125-1.00118-6

de Oliveira FM, Silva Ferraz GA, André ALG, Santana LS, Norton T, Ferraz PFP. Digital and Precision Technologies in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Bibliometric Analysis. Anim 2024; 14(12), 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121832

Fakra DAH, Andriatoavina DAS, Razafindralambo NAMN, Abdallah Amarillis K, Andriamampianina JMM. A simple and low-cost integrative sensor system for methane and hydrogen measurement. Sens Int 2020; 1, 100032. https://hal.science/hal-02938019/file/Article_SI_FAKRA_2020.pdf

Garnsworthy PC, Craigon J, Hernandez-Medrano JH, Saunders N. On-farm methane measurements during milking correlate with total methane production by individual dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95(6), 3166-3180. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4605

Huhtanen P, Cabezas-Garcia EH, Utsumi S, Zimmerman S. Comparison of methods to determine methane emissions from dairy cows in farm conditions. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98(5), 3394-3409. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9118

Johnson KA, Westberg HH, Michal JJ, Cossalman MW. The SF6 tracer technique: methane measurement from ruminants. Measuring methane production from ruminants Chapter 3. Springer 2007; 33-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6133-2_3

Kampers FW, Rossing W, Eradus WJ. The ISO standard for radiofrequency identification of animals. Comput Electron Agric 1999; 24(1-2), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00035-6

Li G, Huang Y, Chen Z, Chesser GD, Purswell JL, Linhoss J, Zhao Y. Practices and Applications of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Computer Vision Systems in Animal Farming: A Review. Sensors 2021; 21(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041492

Nagahage ISP, Nagahage EAAD, Fujino T. Assessment of the applicability of a low-cost sensor–based methane monitoring system for continuous multi-channel sampling. Environ Monit Assess 2021; 193, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09290-w

Negara IGA, Anakottapary DS, Widiantara IBG, Midiani LPI, Nindhia TGT, Santhiarsa I GNN. Integrated microcontroller mq sensors for monitoring biogas: Advancements in methane and hydrogen sulfide detection. J Teknosains 2024; 13(2), 140-151. https://core.ac.uk/download/609733546.pdf

Pinares C, Waghorn G (Eds.). Technical manual on respiration chamber designs. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2014. https://globalresearchalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/GRA-MAN-Facility-BestPract-2012-FINAL.pdf

Ramirez-Agudelo JF, Rosero-Noguera JR, Posada-Ochoa SL. Monitoring methane emissions and intake dynamics in ruminants. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming 2019; 109-114; Cork, Ireland. URL: https://www.eaplf.eu/wp-content/uploads/ECPLF_19_book.pdf

Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 2016; pp. 779-788. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.02640

Sokolova M, Lapalme G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf Process Manag 2009; 45(4), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002

Tedeschi LO, Abdalla AL, Alvarez C, Anuga SW, Arango J, Beauchemin KA, Kebreab E. Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods. J Anim Sci 2022; 100(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac197

Tovar-Sánchez JA, Arias-Molina JF, Milquez-Sanabria HA, Mayorga-Castellanos MA. Diseño técnico de un sistema de cuantificación de metano portable y de bajo costo. Ingeniería 2023; 28. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.19053

WangY, Mücher S, Wang W, Guo L, Kooistra L. A review of three-dimensional computer vision used in precision livestock farming for cattle growth management. Compu Electro Agri 2023; 206, 107687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107687

Zimmerman PR, Zimmerman RS. Method and system for monitoring and reducing ruminant methane production. Patent No. 8,307,785. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 2012. https://patents.justia.com/patent/8307785

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Ramirez-Agudelo, J.-F., Bedoya-Mazo, S., Moreno-Pulgarín, L.-F., & Guarin, J.-F. (2025). Development of an electronic device for automatic and individualized monitoring of enteric methane emissions in dairy cows. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e358533

Issue

Section

Accepted manuscripts