Piglet nursing location along the sow udder line affects piglet weight gain and subsequent weaning weight

Authors

  • Shannon Dierking University of Kentucky https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-9918
  • Harold J Monegue University of Kentucky
  • Merlin Lindemann University of Kentucky

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e358542

Keywords:

behavior, lactation, litter size, milk, nursing, piglet, sow, teat, weaning weight

Abstract

Background: There is a linear correlation between piglet weaning weight and average daily gain in the post nursery period. A key factor that influences piglet weight gain during lactation is milk intake, and the variation that results in piglet weaning weight is hypothesized to be to some degree a result of differences in milk production by individual mammary glands. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the impact of piglet nursing location throughout lactation and its impact on piglet weaning weight, with a secondary objective determining the impact of piglet birthweight on nursing location selection. Methods: Teat pairs were labeled from anterior to posterior (1-7). A total of 1,078 individual piglets were observed; nursing observations were recorded at three timepoints, typically within the same day to verify each piglet’s nursing location during the lactation period. All data was analyzed with the individual piglet as the experimental unit. Results:  The teat pair that piglets nursed during lactation impacted their overall weaning weight (P < 0.01). Numerically heavier piglets were weaned from the anterior teats (teat pairs 1-4: 5.915-6.129 kg), with the heaviest piglets weaned from teat pair 4 (6.129 kg), and the lightest weaned pigs located at teat pair 7 (5.131 kg; teat pairs 5-7: 5.764-5.131 kg). Piglet gain and, thus, subsequent weaning weight was ultimately impacted by their chosen nursing location along the udder line. Within this study, it appears that the first four pairs of anterior teats produced the heaviest weaning weight, but when piglet birthweight is accounted for, the output and nutritional value of milk may be similar, as the average gain was not different across the first four pairs of teats. In contrast, the piglets nursing the posterior pairs five through seven had overall reduced growth characteristics, which may indicate that piglets lighter at birth are pushed to the more posterior teats. Conclusion: An understanding of how milk quantity and quality may differ along the udder line will be necessary for large litters in providing teat access that provides the best opportunity for piglet growth.

|Abstract
= 852 veces | PDF
= 9 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shannon Dierking, University of Kentucky

University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA 20
CSA Animal Nutrition, 6640 Poe Avenue, Suite 225, Dayton, OH 45414

Harold J Monegue, University of Kentucky

University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA

Merlin Lindemann, University of Kentucky

University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA

References

Ag Guide. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 4th edition. Published by the American Dairy Science Association, the American Society of Animal Science, and the Poultry Science Association 2020.https://www.adsa.org/Portals/0/SiteContent/docs/AgGuide4th/Ag_Guide_4th_ed.pdf

Beaulieu AD, Aalhus JL, Williams NH, Patience JF. Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork. J Anim Sci 2010; 88:2767-2778. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2222

Cabrera RA, Boyd RD, Jungst SB, Wilson ER, Johnston ME, Vignes JL, Odle J. Impact of lactation length and piglet weaning weight on long-term growth and viability of progeny. J Anim Sci 2010; 88:2265-2276. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2121

De Passillé AMB, Rushen J, Hartsock TG. Ontogeny of teat fidelity in pigs and its relation to competition at suckling. Can J Anim Sci 1988; 68: 325-338. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas88-037

Donald HP. The milk consumption and growth of suckling pigs. Empire Jour

Exper Agri 1937; 5:349-360. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/31636

Fraser D, Jones RM. The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs: I. Relation to birth weight and subsequent growth. J Agr Sci 1975; 84:387-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600052588

Fraser D, Thompson BK, Ferguson DK, Darroch RL. The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs: III. Relation to competition within litters. J Agri Sci 1979; 92:257-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600062742

Fraser D, Thompson BK. Variation in piglet weights: Relationship to suckling behavior, parity number and farrowing crate design. Can J Anim Sci 1986; 66(10):31-46. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-005

Gondret F, Lefaucheur L, Louveau I, Lebret B, Pichodo X, Le Cozler Y. Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance, tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight. Livest Prod Sci 2005; 93:137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.09.009

Hansen A, Strathe A, Kebreab E, France J, Theil P. Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows: a Bayesian approach. J Anim Sci 2012; 90: 2285-2298. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4788

Hartman DA, Ludwick TM, Wilson RF. Certain aspects of lactation performance in sows. J Anim Sci 1962; 21:883-886. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.214883x

Kim SW, Hurley WL, Han IK, Easter RA. Growth of nursing piglets related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands. J Anim Sci 2000; 78: 1313-1318. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851313x

Mahan DC, Lepine AJ. Effect of pig weaning weight and associated nursery feeding programs on subsequent performance to 105 kilograms body-weight. J Anim Sci 1991; 69:1370-1378. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6941370x

Lannom K. Effects of suckling pigs on sow lactation. Master’s Thesis.2018.

North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, USA.

Pond WG, VanVleck LD, Hartman DA. Parameters for milk yield and for percents of ash, dry matter, fat and protein in sows. J Anim Sci 1962; 21:293-297. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.212293x

Puppe B, Tuchscherer A. Developmental and territorial aspects of suckling behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa f. domestica). J Zool 1999; 249:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00767.x

Quiniou N, Dagorn J, Gaudré D. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livest Prod Sci 2002; 78:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00181-1

Roehe, R. Genetic determination of individual birth weight and its association with sow productivity traits using bayesian analyses. J Anim Sci 1999; 77:330-343. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.772330x

Rosillon-Warnier A, Paquay R. Development and consequences of teat-order in piglets. App Anim Behav Sci 1984;13:47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(84)90051-0

Šamanc H, Sladojevic Z, Vujanac I, Prodanovic R, Kirovski M, Dodovski P, Kirovski D. Relationship between growth of nursing pigs and composition of sow colostrum and milk from anterior and posterior mammary glands. Acta Veterinaria 2013; 63: 537-548. https://doi.org/10.2298/AVB1306537S

Skok| J, Brus M, Skorjanc D. Growth of piglets in relation to milk intake and anatomical location of mammary glands. Acta Agric Scand Sect A-Anim Sci 2007; 57:129-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700801907089

Smith AL, Stalder KJ, Serenius TV, Baas TJ, Mabry JW. Effect of piglet birth weight on weights at weaning and 42 days post weaning. J Swine Health Prod 2007; 15(4):213–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.54846/jshap/518

Downloads

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

Dierking, S., Monegue, H. J., & Lindemann, M. (2025). Piglet nursing location along the sow udder line affects piglet weight gain and subsequent weaning weight. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e358542

Issue

Section

Accepted manuscripts