Piglet nursing location along the sow’s udder line affects piglet weight gain and subsequent weaning weight
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e358542Keywords:
behavior, lactation, litter size, milk, nursing, piglet, sow, teat, weaning weight, sucklingAbstract
Background: There is a linear correlation between piglet weaning weight and average daily gain during the post-nursery period. A key factor that influences piglet weight gain during lactation is milk intake. Thus, the variation in piglet weaning weight is hypothesized to be, to some extent, a result of differences in milk production among individual mammary glands. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of piglet nursing location throughout lactation on piglet weaning weight, with a secondary objective of determining the impact of piglet birth weight on nursing location selection. Methods: Teat pairs were labeled from anterior to posterior (1–7). A total of 1,078 individual piglets from 108 litters were observed; nursing observations were recorded at three time points, typically within the same day, to verify each piglet’s nursing location during the lactation period. All data were analyzed using the individual piglet as the experimental unit. Results: The teat pair on which piglets nursed during lactation impacted their overall weaning weight (P < 0.001). Numerically heavier piglets were weaned from the anterior teats (teat pairs 1–4: 5.906–6.121 kg), with the heaviest piglets weaned from teat pair 4 (6.1219 kg), and the lightest weaned piglets located at teat pair 7 (5.171 kg; teat pairs 5–7: 5.745–5.171 kg). Piglet weight gain and, thus, subsequent weaning weight was ultimately impacted by their chosen nursing location along the udder line. While the first four pairs of anterior teats produced the heaviest weaning weights, after accounting for piglet birth weight to examine actual weight gain, the first four pairs of teats remained the most productive, but the magnitude of the advantage for teat pair 4 was reduced. Additionally, piglets nursing at teat pair 7 represented the lowest birth weight and had overall lower weight gain. Conclusion: Piglet weaning weight differs according to the suckling position along the udder line, and it is partially a function of both the birth weight of the pigs nursing at a particular location and, presumably, the milk production and composition at that location.
Downloads
References
American Dairy Science Association, American Society of Animal Science, Poultry Science Association. Ag guide-Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 4th edition. Champaign (IL): the American Dairy Science Association, the American Society of Animal Science, the Poultry Science Association 2020. https://www.adsa.org/Portals/0/SiteContent/docs/AgGuide4th/Ag_Guide_4th_ed.pdf
Beaulieu AD, Aalhus JL, Williams NH, Patience JF. Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88(8):2767-2778. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2222
Cabrera RA, Boyd RD, Jungst SB, Wilson ER, Johnston ME, Vignes JL, Odle J. Impact of lactation length and piglet weaning weight on long-term growth and viability of progeny. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88(7):2265-2276. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2121
De Passillé AMB, Rushen J, Hartsock TG. Ontogeny of teat fidelity in pigs and its relation to competition at suckling. Can J Anim Sci. 1988; 68(2): 325-338. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas88-037
Donald HP. The milk consumption and growth of suckling pigs. Emp J
Exp Agric. 1937; 5(20):349-360. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/31636
Fraser D, Jones RM. The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs: I. Relation to birth weight and subsequent growth. J Agric Sci. 1975; 84(3):387-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600052588
Fraser D, Thompson BK, Ferguson DK, Darroch RL. The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs: III. Relation to competition within litters. J Agric Sci. 1979; 92(2):257-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600062742
Fraser D, Thompson BK. Variation in piglet weights: Relationship to suckling behavior, parity number and farrowing crate design. Can J Anim Sci. 1986; 66(1):31-46. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-005
Gondret F, Lefaucheur L, Louveau I, Lebret B, Pichodo X, Le Cozler Y. Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance, tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight. Livest Prod Sci. 2005; 93(2):137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.09.009
Hansen A, Strathe A, Kebreab E, France J, Theil P. Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows: a Bayesian approach. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90(7): 2285-2298. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4788
Hartman DA, Ludwick TM, Wilson RF. Certain aspects of lactation performance in sows. J Anim Sci. 1962; 21(4):883-886. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.214883x
Kim SW, Hurley WL, Han IK, Easter RA. Growth of nursing piglets related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78(5): 1313-1318. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851313x
Mahan DC, Lepine AJ. Effect of pig weaning weight and associated nursery feeding programs on subsequent performance to 105 kilograms body-weight. J Anim Sci. 1991; 69(4):1370-1378. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6941370x
Lannom K. Effects of suckling pigs on sow lactation. [Master’s Thesis]. North Carolina, USA: North Carolina State University; 2018. p.61. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.20/35261
Pond WG, VanVleck LD, Haetman DA. Parameters for milk yield and for percents of ash, dry matter, fat and protein in sows. J Anim Sci. 1962; 21(2):293-297. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.212293x
Puppe B, Tuchscherer A. Developmental and territorial aspects of suckling behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa f. domestica). J Zool. 1999; 249(3):307–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00767.x
Quiniou N, Dagorn J, Gaudré D. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livest Prod Sci. 2002; 78(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00181-1
Roehe, R. Genetic determination of individual birth weight and its association with sow productivity traits using bayesian analyses. J Anim Sci. 1999; 77(2): 330-343. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.772330x
Rosillon-Warnier A, Paquay R. Development and consequences of teat-order in piglets. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1984;13(1-2):47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(84)90051-0
Šamanc H, Sladojevic Z, Vujanac I, Prodanovic R, Kirovski M, Dodovski P, Kirovski D. Relationship between growth of nursing pigs and composition of sow colostrum and milk from anterior and posterior mammary glands. Acta Vet. 2013; 63(5-6): 537-548. https://doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?id=0567-83151306537S
Skok| J, Brus M, Skorjanc D. Growth of piglets in relation to milk intake and anatomical location of mammary glands. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2007; 57(3):129-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700801907089
Smith AL, Stalder KJ, Serenius TV, Baas TJ, Mabry JW. Effect of piglet birth weight on weights at weaning and 42 days post weaning. J Swine Health Prod. 2007; 15(4):213–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.54846/jshap/518
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors enable RCCP to reprint the material published in it.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions, and will allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.