Genetic parameters for milk yield and lactation persistency in the three first parities of Iranian Holstein cows

Authors

  • Farzane Shokri-Sangari Shiraz University
  • Hadi Atashi Shiraz University
  • Mohammad Dadpasand Shiraz University
  • Fateme Saghanejad Shiraz University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v32n2a03

Keywords:

dairy cattle, heritability, lactation curve, milk yield, persistency, repeatability

Abstract

Background: Lactation persistency influences cow health and reproduction and has an impact on the feed costs of dairy farms. Objective: To estimate (co)variance components and genetic parameters of 100- and 305-d milk yield, and lactation persistency in Holstein cows in Iran. Methods: Records collected from January 2000 to December 2012 by the Animal Breeding Center of Iran (Karaj, Iran) were used. The following four measures of lactation persistency were used: P21: Ratio of milk yield in the second 100-d in milk (DIM) divided by that of the first 100-d. P31: Ratios of milk yield in the third100-d divided by that of the first 100-d. PW: The persistency measure derived from the incomplete gamma function. PJ: The difference between milk yield in day 60th and 280th of lactation. Results: The estimated heritability of lactation persistency for the three first parities (first, second, and third lactation) ranged from 0.01 to 0.06, 0.02 to 0.10, and 0.01 to 0.12, respectively. Genetic correlations among lactation persistency measures for the three first parities ranged from 0.77 to 0.98, 0.65 to 0.98, and 0.58 to 0.98, respectively; while corresponding values for genetic correlations among lactation persistency with 305-d milk production ranged from 0.18 to 0.63, 0.32 to 0.75, and 0.41 to 0.71, respectively. The estimated repeatability for lactation persistency measures ranged from 0.06 to 0.20. Conclusion: The moderate positive genetic correlation between lactation persistency and 305-d milk yield indicates that selection for increasing milk yield can slightly improve lactation persistency.

|Abstract
= 299 veces | HTML
= 0 veces| | PDF
= 251 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Farzane Shokri-Sangari, Shiraz University

MSc., Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Hadi Atashi, Shiraz University

MSc, PhD., Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Mohammad Dadpasand, Shiraz University

MSc, PhD., Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Fateme Saghanejad, Shiraz University

MSc., Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

References

Atashi H, Moradi Shahrbabak M, Abdolmohammadi AR. Study of suggested measures of milk yield persistency and their relationships. Int J Agric Bio 2006; 8:387–390.

Biassus IDO, Cobuci JA, Costa CN, Rorato PRN, Neto JB, Cardoso LL. Persistence in milk, fat and protein production of primiparous Holstein cows by random regression models. Rev Bras Zootec 2010; 39:2617–2624.

Boujenan I, Hilal B. Genetic and non-genetic effects for lactation curve traits in Holstein-Friesian cows. Anim Prod 2012; 5:450–457.

Canaza-Cayo AW, Lopes PS, da Silva MVGB, de Almeida Torres R, Martins MF, Arbex WA, Cobuci JA. Genetic parameters for milk yield and lactation persistency using random regression models in Girolando cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015; 28:1407-1418.

Cole JB, Null DJ. Genetic evaluation of lactation persistency for five breeds of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:2248–2258.

Dekkers JCM, Ten Hag JH, Weersink A. Economic aspects of persistency of lactation in dairy cattle. Livest Prod Sci1998;53:237–252.

Gengler N. Persistency of lactation yields: A review. Proc. International Workshop on Genetic Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle. Gembloux, Belgium. Interbull Bulletin No. 12. 1996; Uppsala, Sweden. pp. 87–96.

ICAR (International Committee for Animal Recording). 2011. Guidelines approved by the General Assembly held in Riga on June 2010. Section 2.1, pages 23–56, in ICAR Rules, Standards and Guidelines for Recording Milk and Milk Constituents. Accessed Mar. 8, 2013. http://www.icar.org/Documents/Rulesandregulations/Guidelines/Guidelines_2011.pdf.

Jakobsen JH, Madsen P, Jensent J, Pedersen J, Christensen LG, Sorensent DA. Genetic parameters for milk production and persistency for Danish Holsteins estimated in random regression models using REML. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85:1607–1616.

Jakobsen JH, Madsen P, Jensent J, Pedersen J, Christensen LG, Sorensent DA. Genetic parameters for milk production and persistency for Danish Holsteins estimated in random regression models using REML. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85:1607–1616.

Jamrozik J, Jansen G, Schaeffer LR, Liu Z. Analysis of persistency of lactation calculated from a random regression test-day model. Interbull Bulletin No. 17. 1998; Uppsala, Sweden. pp. 64-69.

Johannsson I, Hansson A. 1940. Causes of variation in milk and butterfat yield of dairy cows. Kungl Lantbr Akad Tidskr 1940; 79:1-127.

Macciotta NPP, Dimauro C, Catillo A, Coletta A, Cappio-Borlino A. Factors affecting individual lactation curve shape in Italian river buffaloes. Livest Sci 2006; 104:33-37.

Meyer K. WOMBAT—A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 2007; 8:815–821.

Muir BL, Fatehi J, Schaeffer LR. Genetic relationships between persistency and reproductive performance in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:3029–3037.

Otwinowska-Mindur A, Ptak E. Genetic analysis of lactation persistency in the Polish Holstein-Friesian cows. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2015; 33:109-117.

Rekik B, Ben Gara A. Factors affecting the occurrence of atypical lactations for Holstein-Friesian cows. Livest Prod Sci 2004;87:245-250.

Rekik B, Ben Gara A, Ben Hamouda M, Hammami H. Fitting lactation curves of dairy cattle in different types of herds in Tunisia. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 83:309-315.

Solkner J, Fuchs WA comparison of different measures of persistency with special respect to variation of test-day milk yields. Lives Prod Sci 1987; 16:305–319.

Strabel T, Jamrozik J. 2006. Genetic analysis of milk production traits of Polish Black and White cattle using large-scale random regression test-day models. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:3152–3163.

Swalve HH, Gengler N. Genetics of lactation persistency. British Society of Animal Science. Occasional Publication 24, 1999;pp.75-82.

Swalve HH. Genetic relationships between test-day milk production and persistency in dairy cattle performance records. In: Proc. 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 1994; Guelph, Canada, 18, 467–470.

Tekerli M, Akinci Z, Dogan I, Akcan AM. Factors affecting the shape of lactation curve of Holstein cows from the Balikesir Province of Turkey. J Dairy Sci 200; 83:1381-1386.

van der Linde R, Groen A, de Jong G. Estimation of genetic parameters for persistency of milk production in dairy cattle. Interbull Bulletin No. 25. 2000; Uppsala, Sweden. pp.113–116.

Wood PDP. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 1967; 216:164–165.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-17

How to Cite

Shokri-Sangari, F., Atashi, H., Dadpasand, M., & Saghanejad, F. (2019). Genetic parameters for milk yield and lactation persistency in the three first parities of Iranian Holstein cows. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 32(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v32n2a03

Issue

Section

Original research articles