Estrous behavior, ovulatory follicle dynamics, and corpus luteum size in Creole cows after spontaneous or prostaglandin F2α-induced estrous

Andrés Quezada Casasola; Leonel Avendaño Reyes; Ulises Macías Cruz; José A Ramírez Godínez; Raymundo R Rivas Cáceres

doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.324936

Autores/as

Andrés Quezada Casasola Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
Leonel Avendaño Reyes Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
Ulises Macías Cruz Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua
José A Ramírez Godínez Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua
Raymundo R Rivas Cáceres Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324936

Palabras clave:

calor, crecimiento folicular, ovulación, sincronización

Resumen

Antecedentes: la evaluación del comportamiento reproductivo en vacas Criollas es importante para determinar varios parámetros como la fertilidad, que muestren los mecanismos fisiológicos de la reproducción bajo diferentes condiciones. Así, la secuencia de eventos como ovulación y la subsiguiente formación de cuerpo lúteo se deben considerar al implementar programas de mejoramiento genético bajo condiciones del estro sincronizado o natural. Objetivo: evaluar las características ováricas y conductuales de vacas Criollas antes, durante y después del estro inducido con prostaglandina F2α (PGF2α) o del estro natural. Métodos: treinta vacas Criollas fueron sometidas a sincronización del estro con PGF2α y observadas continuamente durante cinco días para detectar el inicio y la duración del estro. Diecisiete días después del período de detección del estro sincronizado las vacas fueron observadas durante siete días para detectar el estro natural y su duración. Después del inicio de ambos estros, los ovarios de cada vaca fueron monitoreados mediante ultrasonografía cada 8 h para determinar el diámetro del folículo preovulatorio al momento de la desviación y su máximo diámetro alcanzado antes de la ovulación, así como su tasa de crecimiento, tiempo a la ovulación y diámetro máximo del cuerpo lúteo posteriormente formado. Resultados: el momento de inicio y la duración del estro sincronizado y natural fueron similares (p>0,1). El diámetro del folículo dominante al momento de la desviación y antes de la ovulación fueron similares en los dos tipos de estro, pero la tasa de crecimiento del folículo preovulatorio (mm/d) fue mayor (p < 0,05) en el estro sincronizado. No obstante, el tiempo del inicio del estro sincronizado a la ovulación fue mayor (p < 0,01). El diámetro del cuerpo lúteo 10 d después de la ovulación fue similar en ambos estros. Los resultados indican que la tasa de crecimiento del folículo y el tiempo del estro -sincronizado o natural- a la ovulación deben considerarse cuando se requiere manipular el ciclo estral para inseminación artificial. Conclusión: una mayor proporción de vacas Criollas mostraron estro durante la noche, la tasa de crecimiento del folículo ovulatorio es mayor durante el estro sincronizado, y el tiempo del inicio del estro sincronizado con PGF2α a la ovulación es mayor que en el estro natural.

|Resumen

= 564 veces | PDF (ENGLISH)

= 138 veces| | HTML (ENGLISH)

= 27 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Atkins JA, Smith MF, Wells KJ, Geary TW. Factors affecting preovulatory follicle diameter and ovulation rate after gonadotropin-releasing hormone in postpartum beef cows. Part I: cycling cows. J Anim Sci 2010; 88:2300-2310.At-Taras EE, Spahr SL. Detection and characterization of estrous in dairy cattle with an electronic heatmount detector and an electronic activity tag. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84:792-798.Bichard M. Genetic improvement in dairy cattle - an outsider’s perspective. Livest Prod Sci 2002; 75:1-10.Bleach ECL, Glencross RG, Knight PG. Association between ovarian follicle development and pregnancy rates in dairy cows undergoing spontaneous estrous cycles. Reprod 2004; 127:621-629.Britt JH, Scott RG, Armstrong JD, Whitacre MD. Determinants of estrous behavior in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1986; 69:2195-2202.Burns DS, Krassel FJ, Ireland JLH, Knight PG, Ireland JJ. Number of antral follicles during follicular waves in cattle: evidence for high variation among animals, very high repeatability in individuals, and an inverse association with serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations. Biol Reprod 2005; 73:54-62.Cárdenas H, Padilla A, Alvarado E, Vivanco W, Berardinelli JG. Natural and prostaglandin F (PG)-synchronized estrous cycle in Brown Swiss and Simmental heifers in the highland of Peru. Anim Reprod Sci 1991; 26:211-217.Cooke RF, Arthington JD, Araujo DB, Lamb GC. Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, temeperament, physiological responses and pregnancy rates of Brahman-crossed cows. J Anim Sci 2009; 87:4125-4132.Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Cappellozza BI, Mueller CJ, Delcurto T. Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. J Anim Sci 2012; 90:3547-3555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4768

Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2015; 28:303-312Quezada-Casasola A et al. Ovulatory dynamics in Creole cowsde Alba J. Criollo cattle in Latin America. In: Animal Genetic Resources: strategies for improved use and conservation. FAO Animal production and health paper 66. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. 1987.Drillich M, Tenhagen BA, Heuwieser W. Effect of one spontaneous estrous cycle (after synchronization with PGF2α) on reproductive performance in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2000; 54:1389-1394.Folman Y, Kaim M, Herz Z, Rosenberg M. Comparison of methods for the synchronization of estrous cycles in dairy cows. 2. Effects of progesterone and parity on conception. J Dairy Sci 1990; 73:2817-2825.Fortune JE. Ovarian follicular growth and development in mammals. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:225-232.Fortune JE, Sirois J, Quirk SM. The growth and differentiation of ovarian follicles during the bovine estrous cycle. Theriogenology 1988; 29:95-109.Galina CS, Orihuela A, Rubio I. Behavioral trends affecting estrous detection in Zebu cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 1996; 42:465-470.Grygar I, Kudláč E, Doležel R, Nedbálková J. Volume of luteal tissue and concentration of serum progesterone in cow bearing homogenous corpus luteum or corpus luteum with cavity. Anim Reprod Sci 1997; 49:77-82.Hanzen CH, Pieterse M, Scenze O, Drost M. Relative accuracy of the identification of ovarian structures in the cow by ultrasonography and palpation per rectum. Vet J 2000; 159:161-70.Hill WG. Maintenance of quantitative genetic variation in animal breeding programmes. Livest Prod Sci 2000; 63:99-109.Jaiswal RS, Singh J, Marshall L, Adams GP. Repeatability of 2-wave and 3-wave patterns of ovarian follicular development during the bovine estrous cycle. Theriogenology 2009; 72: 81-90.Landivar C, Galina CS, Duchateau A, Navarro-Fierro R. Fertility trial in zebu cattle after a natural or controlled estrous with prostaglandin F2 alpha, comparing natural mating with artificial insemination. Theriogenology 1985; 23:421-427.Larson LL, Ball PJH. Regulation of estrous cycles in dairy cattle: a review. Theriogenology 1992; 38:255-267.Lucy MC, Staples RC, Michel MF, Thatcher WW. Energy balance and size and number of ovarian follicles detected by ultrasonography in early postpartum dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74:473-482.Lüttgenau J, Ulbrich SE, Beindorff N, Honnens A, Herzog K, Bollwein H. Plasma progesterone concentrations in the mid-luteal phase are dependent on luteal size, independent of luteal blood flow and gene expression in lactating dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2011; 125:20-29.Lynch CO, Kenny DA, Childs S, Diskin MG. The relationship between periovulatory endocrine and follicular activity on corpus luteum size, function, and subsequent embryo survival. Theriogenology 2010; 73:190-198.Mondal M, Rajkhowa C, Prakash BS. Behavioral estrous signs can predict the time of ovulation in mithun (Bos frontalis). Theriogenology 2006; 66:1391-1396.Murphy MG, Boland MP, Roche JF. Pattern of follicular growth and resumption of ovarian activity in postpartum beef suckled cows. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 90:523-533.Nisweinder GD, Juengel JL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW. Mechanisms controlling the function and life span of the corpus luteum. Phys Rev 2000; 80:1-29.Odde KG. A review of synchronization of estrous in pospartum cattle. J Anim Sci 1990; 68:817-830.Parker KI, Robertson DM, Groome NP, Macmillan KL. Plasma concentrations of Inhibin A and follicle-stimulating hormone differ between cows with two or three waves of ovarian follicular development in a single estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 2003; 68: 822-828.Peter AT, Levine H, Drost M, Bergfelt DR. Compilation of classical and contemporary terminology used to describe morphological aspects of ovarian dynamics in cattle. Theriogenology 2009; 71:1343-1357.Piggott SM, Fitkin DR, Steffen AJ, Timms LL. Evaluation of accuracy and characterization of estrous activity as monitored by an electronic pressure sensing system for estrous detection in dairy cows and heifers. J Anim Sci 1996; 74:70 (Abstr).Pinheiro OL, Barros CM, Figuereido RA, do Valle ER, Encarnação RO, Padovani CR. Estrous behavior and the estrous-to-ovulation interval in Nelore cattle (Bos indicus) with natural estrous or estrous induced with prostaglandin F2α or norgestomet and estradiol valerate. Theriogenology 1998; 49: 667-681.Quintal-Franco JA, Kojima FN, Melvin EJ, Lindsey BR, Zanella E, Fike KE, Wehrman ME, Clopton DT, Zinder JE. Corpus luteum development and function in cattle with episodic release of luteinizing hormone pulses inhibited in the follicular and early luteal phases of the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:921-926.Rios JG. Curso de acreditación de inspectores de ganado Criollo para registro; 2010 March 27-28; Chihuahua, México. SAGARPA, ASOCRIOLLO, CONARGEN, 2010.Roelofs J, Graat EA, Mullaart E, Soede NM, Voskamp-Hankema W, Kemp B. Effects of insemination-ovulation interval on fertilization rates and embryo characteristics in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2006; 66:2173-2181.Sartori R, Barros CM. Reproductive cycles in Bos Indicus cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2011; 125: 244-250.Sartori R, Fricke PM, Ferreira JCP, Ginther OJ, Wiltbank MC. Follicular deviation and acquisition of ovulatory capacity in bovine follicles. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:1403-1409.SAS®.SAS/STAT. User’s Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Version 9.0th Ed. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA: 2004.Stevenson JS, Lamb GC, Kobayashi Y, Hoffmann DP. Luteolysis during two stages of the estrous cycle: subsequent endocrine profiles associated with radiotelemetrically detected estrous in Heifers. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81:2897-2903.

Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2015; 28:303-312Quezada-Casasola A et al. Ovulatory dynamics in Creole cowsTanabe TY, Hann RC. Synchronized estrous and subsequent conception in Dairy heifers treated with prostaglandin F2α. 1. Influence of stage of cycle at treatment. J Anim Sci 1983; 58:805-811.Townson DH, Tsang PCW, Butler WR, Frajblat M, Griel LC, Johnson CJ, Milvae RA, Niksic GM, Pate JL. Relationship of fertility to ovarian follicular waves before breeding in dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2002; 80:1053-1058.Van Vliet JH, Van Eerdenburg FJCM. Sexual activities and estrous detection in lactating Holstein cows. App Anim Behav Sci 1996; 50:57-69.Walker WL, Nebel RL, McGilliard ML. Time ofovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1996; 79:1555-1561.Wiltbank JN, Shumway RP, Parker WR, Zimmerman DR. Duration of estrous, time of ovulation, and fertilization rate in beef heifers synchronized with dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide. J Anim Sci 1967; 26:764-767.Wiltbank MC, Shiao TF, Bergfelt DR, Ginther OJ. Prostaglandin F2α receptors in the early bovine corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:74-78.Zárate-Martínez JP, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Rodríguez-Almeida FA. Estrous synchronization and fertility in Creole cows treated with CIDR, progesterone, ß-estradiol and PGF2α. J Anim Sci 2006; 84 (2):151(Abstr).