Comportamiento de terneros Holstein-Friesian bebiendo agua desalinizada en el período pre-destete
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v35n3a04Palabras clave:
agua desalinizada, calidad de agua, comportamiento productivo, consumo de agua, digestibilidad, lactancia artificial, sales disueltas totales, terneros HolsteinResumen
Antecedentes: Una alta salinidad del agua de bebida puede afectar negativamente la salud y el comportamiento productivo de los terneros durante la crianza. Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto del contenido de sales disueltas totales (SDT) en el agua de bebida sobre el comportamiento productivo de los terneros durante la crianza artificial. Métodos: Veintinueve terneros Holstein-Friesian recién nacidos, con 39±0,94 kg de peso vivo fueron asignados aleatoriamente a dos tratamientos. El tratamiento 1 consistió de 14 terneros que bebieron agua con 1.469±75 mg L-1 de SDT; mientras que al tratamiento 2 se asignaron 15 terneros que recibieron agua de la misma fuente, pero filtrada mediante el procedimiento de ósmosis inversa y conteniendo 107±31 mg L-1 de SDT. Resultados: La concentración de SDT afectó numéricamente el consumo de agua durante los 56 días de lactancia (p>0,08), incrementándose 13% cuando los terneros bebieron agua con bajo contenido de sales (3.554 vs 3.088 ml d-1). El consumo de alimento (base seca) disminuyó 26% (500 vs 676 g d-1; p< 0,01) y la ganancia diaria de peso se incrementó 29% (434 vs 335 g d-1; p<0,05) en los terneros que bebieron agua con bajos SDT en comparación con los que bebieron agua con alto contenido de sales. Asimismo, al finalizar el periodo de lactancia artificial los terneros que bebieron agua desalinizada tuvieron mayor peso corporal (64,3 vs 58,6 kg; p<0,01) comparado con los que bebieron agua con alta concentración de sales. El contenido de SDT no afectó la digestibilidad de materia seca y proteína del alimento (p>0,05). Conclusión: El agua de bebida desalinizada mejora el comportamiento productivo de terneros Holstein durante la crianza artificial.
Descargas
Citas
Attia-Ismail SA, Abdo AR, Asker ART. Effect of salinity level in drinking water on feed intake, nutrition utilization, water intake and turnover and rumen function in sheep and goats. Egypt J of Sheep and Goat Sci 2008; 3(1): 77-94. URL: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/FullTextPDF/2011/20113239537.pdf
Bahman AM, Rooker JA, Topps JH. The performance of dairy cows offered drinking water of a low or high salinity in hot arid climate. Anim Sci 1993; 57(1): 23-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100006565
Beede DK. The most essential nutrient: water. Proceedings of the 7th Western Dairy Management Conference; 2005 March 9-11 Pages 13-31; Reno, NV. URL: https://cals.arizona.edu/extension/dairy/az_nm_newsletter/2005/june.pdf
Brew MN, Carter J, Maddox MK. The impact of water quality on beef cattle health and performance. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, AN187 Publication 2008; Gainesville, Florida. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/-download?doi=10.1.1.578.5177&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Coria ML, Fay JP, Cseh SB, Brizuela MA. Efecto de concentraciones elevadas de sales totales y sulfatos en agua de bebida sobre la degradabilidad ruminal in vitro de Thinopyrum ponticum. Arch Med Vet 2007; 39(3): 261-267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2007000300010
Dévora IGE, González ER, Ponce FNE. Técnicas para desalinizar agua de mar y su Desarrollo en México. Ra Ximhai 2012; 8(2): 57-68. ULR: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/461/46123333006.pdf
Drewnoski ME, Pogge DJ, Hansen SL. High-sulfur in beef cattle diets: A review. J Anim Sci 2014; 92(9): 3763-3780. URL: http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/early/2014/06/30/jas.2013-7242
El-Mahdy C, Boaru A, Pospescu S, Borda C. Water Quality, Essential Condition Sustaining the Health, Production and Reproduction in Cattle: A Review. Bulletin UASVM Anim Sci and Biotech 2016; 73(2): 113-125. URL: https://journals.usamvcluj.ro/index.php/zootehnie/article/viewFile/12156/9959
Espinosa VRM, Delfín AI, Hernández OMA. Metodologías para Evaluar la Calidad del Agua. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Alcapotzalco. 1ra. Edición 2006; México. URL: http://zaloamati.azc.uam.mx/handle/11191/5085?show=full&locale-attribute=es
García E. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Koppen (para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana). 5ª ed. Instituto de Geografía, UNAM 2004; México. URL: http://www.publicaciones.igg.unam.mx/index.php/ig/catalog/view/83/82/251-1
Gould HD. Polioencephalomalacia. J Anim Sci 1998; 76(1): 309-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761309x
Grout AS, Veira DM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Fraser D. Differential effects of sodium and magnesium sulfate on water consumption by beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(5): 1252-1258. URL: http://animalstudiesrepository.org/bioche
Huuskonen A, Tuomisto L, Kauppinen R. Effect of drinking water temperature on water intake and performance of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94(5): 2475-2480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3723
Huhtanen P, Kaustell K, Jaakkola S. The use of internal markers to predict total digestibility and duodenal flow of nutrients in cattle given six different diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1994; 48(3-4): 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90173-2
Johnson PS, Patterson HH, Haigh R. Effects of sulfates in water on performance of steers grazing rangeland. South Dakota State University Beef Report. Beef 2004; 5(1): 27-30. URL: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2004/9
Lardner HA, Kirychuk BD, Braul L, Willms WD, Yarotski J. The effect of water quality on cattle performance on pasture. Crop Pasture Sci 2005; 56(1): 97-104. URL: https://www.publish.csiro.au/cp/ar04086
LeJeune JT, Besser TE, Merill NL, Rice DH, Hancock DD. Livestock drinking water microbiology and the factors influencing the quality of drinking water offered to cattle. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84(8): 1856-1862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74626-7
López A, Arroquy JI, Distel RA. Early exposure to and subsequent beef cattle performance with saline water. Livest Sci 2016; 85(3): 68-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.01.013
López A, Arroquy JI, Juárez SAV, DiLorenzo N, Barrionuevo M., Distel RA. High-sulfate water consumption determines intake and metabolic responses to protein supplementation in lambs consuming low-quality forage. J Anim Sci 2017; 95(5): 2111-2120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1264
Lutnicki K, Madej E, Riha T, Kurek L. Polioencephalomalacia in ruminants caused by excessive amount of sulphur-a review. Bull Vet Inst in Pulawy 2014; 58(2): 321-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2014-0050
NMX (Norma Mexicana NMX-K-282-SCFI-2012). Determinación de hidróxidos y carbonatos en soluciones de hipoclorito de sodio – método de prueba. Secretaría de Economía, México. 2012. ULR:https://caisatech.net/uploads/XXI_2_MXD_C20_NMX-K-282-SCFI-2012_R0_8MAY2012.pdf
NMX (Norma Mexicana NMX-AA-074-SCFI-2014). Análisis de agua – medición de sulfatos en aguas naturales y residuals – métodos de prueba. Secretaría de Economía, México. 2014. ULR: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/166149/nmx-aa-074-scfi-2014.pdf
NRC. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev ed. National Academy Press 2001; Washington, DC. URL: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9825.html
NRC. National Research Council. Mineral tolerance of animals. 2th rev. ed. National Academy Press 2005; Washington, DC. URL: https://books.google.com.mx/books?hl=en-&lr=&id=UTva4Zbh_8UC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=National+Research+Council.
Patterson HH, Johnson PS, Young DB, Haigh R. Effects of water quality on performance and health of growing steers. South Dakota State University Beef Report. Beef 2003; 15: 101-104. URL: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2003
Patterson HH, Johnson PS, Ward EH, Gates RN. Effects of sulfates in water on performance of cow-calf pairs. Proceedings Western Section American Society of Animal Science 2004a; 55: 265-268. URL: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2004
Patterson HH, Johnson PS, Epperson WB, Haigh R. Effects of total dissolved solids and sulfates in drinking water for growing steers. South Dakota State University Beef Report. Beef 2004b; 5: 27-30. URL: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2004/6
Patterson HH, Johnson PS, Perry G, Gates NR, Haigh R. Response of cow-calf pairs to water high in sulfates. South Dakota State University Beef Report. Beef 2005; 5: 19-22. URL: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2005/6
Penning PD, Johnson RH. The use of internal markers to estimate herbage digestibility and intake. 2. Indigestible acid detergent fibre. J Agri Sci Cambridge 1983; 100(1): 133-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032524
Rosas, I., R. Belmont, A. Armienta, A.,and A. Baez. Arsenic concentrations in water, soil, milk and forage in Comarca Lagunera, Mexico.Water Air & Soil Pollution 1999; 112(1-2): 133-149. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005095900193
Ru YJ, Fischer M, Glatz PC, Bao YM. Effect of Salt Level in the Feed on Performance of Red and Fallow Weaner. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 2004; 17(5): 638-642. URL: https://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/17_104.pdf
Sanderson MW, Sargeant JM, Renter DG, Griffin DD, Smith RA. Factors associated with the presence of coliforms in the feed and water of feedlot cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71(10): 6026-6032. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.10.6026-6032.2005
SAS. Statistical Analysis System User’s Guide. Release 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. 2013, Cary, NC, USA.
Schütz K. Effects of Providing Clean Water on the Health and Productivity of Cattle. Report for NRC 2012; 400: 346. ULR: https://envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/1051-NLRC142-Effects-of-providing-clean-water-on-the-health-and-productivity-of-cattle.pdf
Shapasand M, Alizadeh AR, Yousefi M, Amini J. Performance and Physiological Responses of Dairy Cattle to Water Total Dissolved Solids Under Heat Stress. J Appl Anim Res 2010; 38(2): 165-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2010.10539504
Sharma A, Kundu SS, Tariq H, Kewalramani N, Yadav RK. Impact of total dissolved solids in drinking water on nutrient utilisation and growth performance of Murrah buffalo calves. Livest Sci 2017; 198(1): 17-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.02.002
Sharma A, Kundu SS, Tariq H, Kewalramani N, Singh S. Quantitative prediction of drinking water intake of Murrah buffalo calves under saline water. Indian J Anim Res 2018; 52(3): 459-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.11169
SIAP. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Resumen nacional pecuario 2017; México. URL: http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx/repoAvance_siap_gb/pecResumen.jsp
Socha MT, Ensley SM, Tomlinson DJ, Johnson AB. Variability of water composition and potential impact on animal performance. In Proc Intermountain Nutr Conf 2003 page 85-96; Salt Lake City, UT. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237693729
Solomon R, Miron J, Ben-Ghedalia D, Zomberg D. Performance of high producing dairy cows offered drinking water of high and low salinity in the Arava desert. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78(3): 620-624. URL: https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(95)76672-3/pdf
Tsukahara Y, Puchala R, Sahlu T, Goetsch AL. Effects of level of brackish water on feed intake, digestion, heat energy, and blood constituents of growing Boer and Spanish goat wethers. J Anim Sci 2016; 94(9): 3864-3874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0553
Umar S, Munir MT, Azeem T, Ali TS, W. Umar W, Rehman A, Shah MA. Effects of water quality on productivity and performance of livestock: A mini review. Open Access J Vet 2014; 2(2): 11-15. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muahammad-_Tanveer_Munir/publication/284550968/links/5654c53d08aeafc2aabc0d90.pdf
Valtorta ES, Gallardo RM, Sbodio AO, Revelli RG, Arakaki C, Leva EP, Gaggiotti M, Tercero EJ. Water salinity effects on performance and rumen parameters of lactating grazing Holstein cows. Int J Biometeorol 2008; 52(3): 239-247. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-007-0118-3
Waldner DN, Looper ML. Water for dairy cattle. Cooperative Extension Service 2007; Guide D-107 Pages 1-5. New Mexico State University. URL: https://aces.nmsu.edu/pubs/d/D107.pdf
Weeth HJ, Capps DL. Tolerance of growing cattle for sulfate water. J Anim Sci 1972; 34(2): 256-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1972.342256x
Willms DW, Kenzie RO, McAllister AT, Colwell D, Veira D, Wilmshurst FJ, Entz T, Olson EM. Effects of water quality on cattle performance. J Range Management 2002; 55(5): 452-460. URL: https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/view/9741/-9353
Wong JAC, Sánchez DGR, Cervantes GG, Castillo IO y Avalos JE. Características químicas de aguas de pozos profundos del acuífero de Villa Juárez, Durango. Agrofaz: Publicación semestral de investigación científica 2005; 5(2): 869-874. URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2307493
Wright CL. Management of water quality for beef cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 2007; 23(1): 91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.12.002
Yirga H, Puchala R, Tsukahara Y, Tesfai K, Sahlu Y, Mengistu UL, Goetsch AL. Effects of level of brackish water and salinity on feed intake, digestion, heat energy, ruminal fluid characteristics, and blood constituent levels in growing Boer goat wethers and mature Boer goat and Katahdin sheep wethers. Small Ruminant Res 2018. 164(1): 70-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.05.004
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores permiten a RCCP reimprimir el material publicado en él.
La revista permite que los autores tengan los derechos de autor sin restricciones, y permitirá que los autores conserven los derechos de publicación sin restricciones.
