Fermentação ruminal e digestibilidade de resíduo de substrato de cogumelo (Pleurotus ostreatus) inoculado com Lactobacillus brevis en novilhos Hanwoo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v30n4a02Palavras-chave:
ensilados de subprodutos agrícolas, custo de alimentação, técnica de saco de nylon, digestibilidade total do trato, ácidos graxos voláteisResumo
Antecedentes: Ensilagem de resíduo de substrato de cogumelo (SMS) geralmente aumenta a digestibilidade e a qualidade dos nutrientes. Objetivo: Determinar a qualidade da alimentação e digestibilidade do RSC apartir do Pleurotus ostreatus (SMSP) inoculado com bactérias de ácido láctico (LAB: Lactobacillus brevis) nos novilhos Hanwoo. Métodos: Desaparecimento ruminal do SMSP e ISMSP (SMSP inoculado) foram avaliados em três novilhos Hanwoo fistulados no rúmen (408 ± 13.0 Kg peso corporal). Além disso, três novilhos Hanwoo (336 ± 69.0 Kg peso corporal) foram aleatoriamente distribuídos para um dos três tratamentos dietéticos (controle: 25% palha, 75% concentrado; tratamentos: 25% palha, 60% concentrado, e 15% ambos SMSP e ISMSP) em um quadrado Latino de 3×3. Resultados: A composição química da dieta ISMSP não diferiu do controle ou das dietas SMSP. Na dieta ISMSP, a taxa de diminuição do pH do fluido ruminal e o aumento no período de armazenamento foram melhores do que com a dieta SMSP. O desaparecimento ruminal de matéria seca, proteína bruta, fibra em detergente neutro, e fibra detergente ácido foi ligeiramente superior em novilhos alimentados com ISMSP, do que aqueles alimentados com SMSP. Além disso, a taxa de degradação e degradabilidade da proteína bruta foi maior na dieta ISMSP, do que na dieta SMSP. As características efetivas de fermentação ruminal e a digestibilidade total de nutrientes não foram afetadas pela dieta SMSP, nem pela dieta ISMSP. Conclusão: Dietas com SMSP e ISMSP podem ser utilizados em substituição ao concentrado formulado sem causar efeitos adversos e ser um alimento rentável em novilhos Hanwoo. Além disso, a inoculação com LAB melhorou a qualidade conservante da SMSP.
Downloads
Referências
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,Arington, VA, USA; 2012.
Ayala M, González-Muñoz SS, Pinos-Rodríguez JM, Vázquez C, Meneses M, Loera O, Mendoza GD. Fibrolytic potential of spent compost of the mushroom Agaricus bisporus to degrade forages for ruminants. Afr J Microbiol Res 2011; 5:241-249.
Bosch MW, Janssen IM, Bruchem JV, Boer H, Hof G. Digestion of alfalfa and grass silages in sheep, 1: Rates of fermentation in and passage from the reticulorumen. Neth J Agric Sci (Netherlands) 1988; 36:175-178.
Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 1962; 8:130-132.
Cushnahan A, Mayne CS, Unsworth EF. Effects of ensilage of grass on performance and nutrient utilization by dairy cattle 2. Nutrient metabolism and rumen fermentation. Anim Sc 1995; 60:347-359.
Denham SC, Morantes GA, Bates DB, Moore JE. Comparison of two models used to estimate in situ nitrogen disappearance. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72:708-714.
Jaakkola S, Huhtanen P, Hissa K. The effect of cell wall degrading enzymes or formic acid on fermentation quality and on digestion of grass silage by cattle. Grass For Sci 1991; 46:75-87.
Jones BA, Hatfield RD, Muck RE. Effect of fermentation and bacterial inoculation on lucerne cell walls. J Sci Food Agric1992; 60:147-153.
Kakkar VK, Dhanda S. Comparative evaluation of wheat and paddy straws for mushroom production and feeding residual straws to ruminants. Bioresour Technol 1998; 66:175-177.
Kakkar VK, Garcha HS, Dhanda S, Makkar GS. Mushroom harvested spent straw as feed for buffaloes. Indian J Anim Nutrition 1990; 7:267-272.
Keady TWJ, Steen RWJ. Effects of treating low dry-matter grass with a bacterial inoculant on the intake and performance of beef cattle and studies on its mode of action. Grass For Sci 1994; 49:438-446.
Kim YI, Park JM, Lee YH, Lee M, Choi DY, Kwak WS. Effect of by-product feed-based silage feeding on the performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers (a field study). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015; 28:180-187.
Kim YI, Oh YK, Park KK, Kwak WS. Ensiling characteristics and the in situ nutrient degradability of a by-product feed-based silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014; 27:201-208.
Kim YI, Lee YH, Kim KH, Oh YK, Moon YH, Kwak WS. Effects of supplementing microbially-fermented spent mushroom substrates on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers (a field study). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2012; 25:1575-1581.
Kwak WS, Jung SH, Kim YI. Broiler litter supplementation improves storage and feed-nutritional value of sawdust-basedspent mushroom substrate. Bioresour Technol 2008; 99:2947-2955.
Liu MF, Goonewardene LA, Bailey DRC, Basarab JA, Kemp RA, Arthur PF, Okine EK, Makarechian M. A study on the variation of feed efficiency in station tested beef bulls. Can J Anim Sci 2000; 80:435-441.
McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd Ed. Aberystwyth, UK: Chalcombe Publ. Cambriam Printers Ltd; 1991.
Muck RE, Filya I, Contreras-Govea FE. Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: In vitrogas and volatile fatty acid production. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 5115-5125.
Nadeau EM, Buxton DR. Cellulase and bacterial inoculant effectson cocks-foot and lucerne ensiled at high dry matter levels. J Sci Food Agric 1997; 73:369-376.
National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.7th rev. ed. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2001.
Nowak W, Potkanski A, Wylegala S. The effect of additives on quality and nutrient degradability and digestibility of round bale silage. S Afr J Anim Sci 2004; 34:123-129.
Oh YK, Lee WM, Choi CW, Kim KH, Hong SK, Lee SC, Seol YJ, Kwak WS, Choi NJ. Effects of spent mushroom substrates supplementation on rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in Hanwoo steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010; 23:1608-1613.
Ørskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 1979; 92:499-503.
Rinker DL. Handling and using “spent” mushroom substrate around the world. Mushroom biology and mushroom products. UAEM, Cuernavaca;2002.
Rooke JA, Greife HA, Armstrong DG. The digestion by cattle of grass silages made with no additive or with the application of formic acid or formic acid and formaldehyde. Grass For Sci 1983; 38:301-310.
Rowghani E, Zamiri MJ. The effects of a microbial inoculant and formic acid as silage additives on chemical composition, ruminal degradability and nutrient digestibility of corn silage in sheep. Iranian J Vet Res 2009; 10:110-118.
Stokes MR. Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant, and their interaction on silage fermentation and dairy production. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75:764-773.
Weinberg ZG, Chen Y, Weinberg P. Ensiling olive cake with and without molasses for ruminant feeding. Bioresour Technol 2008; 99:1526-1529.
Yahaya MS, Goto M, Yimiti W, Smerjai B, Kuwamoto Y. Additive effects of fermented juice of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid on silo fermentation and ruminal degradability of tropical elephant grass. J Anim Vet Adv 2004; 3:116-12.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os autores autorizam a RCCP a reimprimir o material nela publicado.
A revista permite que o(s) autor(es) detenham os direitos autorais sem restrições, e permitirá que o(s) autor(es) mantenham os direitos de publicação sem restrições.
