Can soil physicochemical characteristics affect the presence of Bacillus thuringiensis spores?

Authors

  • Paul Maduell Corporation for Biological Research
  • Gemma Armengol Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Sergio Orduz Corporation for Biological Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329427

Keywords:

Bacillus thuringiensis, ecology, Colombia, mathematic models, soil physiochemical characteristics

Abstract

One hundred and one soil samples from several departments of Colombia were collected; for each of them, 14 different physicochemical variables were evaluated, along with the presence and number of Bacillus thuringiensis spores, and a statistical study was performed. No simple regression between each of the variables and the presence of B. thuringiensis spores was found, suggesting that the relationship between B. thuringiensis spores and soil must be complex. By multiple regression, however, three models with several variables were found. Moreover, Logit regression analysis revealed another model that might allow to correlate the presence of B. thuringiensis spores with some physicochemical variables in a given soil sample. In all models, soil pH was the most important factor. Even though soil pH had no effect by itself, the combination of soil pH along with other variables, such as CEC, nutrient availability (Ca, Mg, K), clay content and soil texture, had an effect on B. thuringiensis biology. The models found in the present study represent novel tools that could facilitate the understanding the ecology of B. thuringiensis.

|Abstract
= 104 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 73 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernhard K, Jarrett P, Medadows M, Butt J, Ellis DJ, Roberts GM, Pauli S, Rodgers P, Burges HD. 1997. Natural isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis: worldwide distribution, characterization, and activity against insect pests. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 70:59-68.

Bower C, Reitemeier RF, Fireman M. 1952. Exchangeable cations. Analysis of saline in alkali soils. Soil Science, 73:251-261.

Bravo A, Sarabia S, López L, Ontiveros H, Abarca C, Ortiz A, Ortiz M, Lina L, Villalobos FJ, Peña G, Núñez-Valdez ME, Soberón M, Quintero R. 1998. Characterization of cry genes in a mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64:4965-4972.

Burbano H. 1989. El suelo: una visión sobre sus componentes bioorgánicos. Universidad de Nariño, Pasto.Chilcott CN, Wigley PJ. 1993. Isolation and toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis from soils and habitats in New Zealand. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 61:244-247.

Damgaard PH, Hansen BM, Pedersen JC, Eilenberg J. 1997. Natural occurrence of Bacillus thuringiensis on cabbage foliage and in insects associated with cabbage crops. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 82:253-258.

Dias SC, Sagardoy MA. 1998. Influence of pH on the toxicity and survival of total cells and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis. Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 30:122-129.

Gammack SM, Paterson E, Kemp JS, Cresser MS, Killham K.1990. Factors affecting the movement of microorganisms in soils. In: Sotzky G, Bollag JM (eds.). Soil biochemistry. New York Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 263-305.

Helgarson E, Caugant DA, Olsen I, Kolsto A-B. 2000. Genetic structure of population of Bacillus cereus and B. thuringiensisisolates associated with periodontitis and other human infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38:1615-1622.

Hossain MA., Ahmed S, Hoque S. 1997. Abundance and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis in the agricultural soils of Bangladesh. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,70:221-225.

Iriarte J, Bel Y, Ferrandis MD, Andrew R, Murillo J, Ferrer J, Caballero P. 1998. Environmental distribution and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in Spain. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 21:97-106.

Jackson ML. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Jackson ML. 1960. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Kim HS, Lee DW, Woo SD, Yu YM, Kang SK. 1998. Distribution, serological identification, and PCR analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis isolated from soils of Korea. Current Microbiology, 37:195-200.

Maeda M, Mizuki E, Nakamura Y, Hatano T, Ohba M. 2000. Recovery of Bacillus thuringiensis from marine sediments of Japan. Current Microbiology, 40:418-422.

Martin PAW, Travers RS. 1989. Worldwide abundance and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55:2437-2442.

Ohba M, Aizawa K. 1986. Distribution of Bacillus thuringiensisin soils of Japan. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,47:277-282.

Ohba M. 1996. Bacillus thuringiensis population naturally occurring on mulberry leaves: a possible source of the populations associated with silkworm-rearing insectaries. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 80:56-64.

Orduz S, Rojas W, Correa MM, Montoya AE, De Barjac H.1992. A new serotype of Bacillus thuringiensis from Colombia toxic to mosquito larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,59:99-103.

Orduz S, Diaz T, Restrepo N, Patiño MM, Tamayo MC.1996. Biochemical, immunological and toxicological characteristics of the crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensissubsp. medellin. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz,91(2):231-237.

Petras SF, Casida Jr LE. 1985. Survival of Bacillus thuringiensisspores in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,50:1496-1501.

Realpe M, Montoya D, Orduz S. 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis:legado para el siglo XXI. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología1:11-27.

Robert M, Chenu C. 1990. Interactions between soil minerals and microorganisms. In: Sotzky G, Bollag JM (eds.). Soil biochemistry. New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 219-234.

Saleh SM, Harris RF, Allen ON. 1969. Fate of Bacillus thuringiensisin soil: effect of soil pH and organic amendment. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 16:677-680.

Schollenberger CJ. 1945. Determination of soil organic matter. Soil Sciences, 59:53-56.

Shorey HH, Hale RL. 1965. Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine Noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. Journal of Economic Entomology, 58:522-524.

Silva F, Olarte LI. 1973. Métodos analíticos de laboratorio de suelos. 3.a ed. Instituto Geográfico Agustin Codazzi, Bogotá.

Smith RA, Couche GA. 1991. The phylloplane as a source of Bacillus thuringiensis variants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57:311-315.

West AW, Burges HD, Dixon TJ, Wyborn CH. 1985. Survival of Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus spore inocula in soil: effects of pH, moisture, nutrient availability and indigenous microorganisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,17:657-665.

Published

2017-11-22

How to Cite

Maduell, P., Armengol, G., & Orduz, S. (2017). Can soil physicochemical characteristics affect the presence of Bacillus thuringiensis spores?. Actualidades Biológicas, 27(82), 8. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329427

Issue

Section

Full articles