From epiméleia heautu in Socrates to inquisitiveness for the subject in psychoanalysis

Authors

  • Jorge Iván Jaramillo UNIMINUTO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.15633

Keywords:

subject, truth, care of the self, ethics

Abstract

Michel Foucault's thinking moved from the relationships between the subject and the apparatus of power to a conception that seeks to vindicate the relationships between the subject and truth. Such conception is in the context of an imperative forgotten by the Modern thinking that reached its apex under the assertion “I think, therefore I am.” This imperative, from a Foucauldian perspective, is in the terms of a “care of the self”, which becomes a form of asceticism where it is necessary to return in order to restore the forgotten relationship between the subject and truth.
This text is a reflection on psychoanalysis as a possible practice that restores the care of the self, taking into account its specificity, so that a theory that has the subject as an axial element must also take into account a fundamental question: what is psychoanalysis concerned about? What is the nature of this subject?

|Abstract
= 323 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 126 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jorge Iván Jaramillo, UNIMINUTO

Psychologist. Master in Psychoanalytic Research, University of Antioquia. Full-time teacher-researcher at UNIMINUTO. Member of the Interdisciplinary Group of Social Studies (GIES) of UNIMINUTO. Member of the Psychoanalysis Research Group, subject and society in the line of research "Psychoanalysis, philosophy and epistemology" at the University of Antioquia. Member of the IF-EPFCL, Medellín Forum.

References

Allouch, J. (2007) El psicoanálisis ¿es un ejercicio espiritual? Buenos Aires, Argentina: Literales.

Foucault, M. (2000) La ética del cuidado de sí como práctica de la libertad. En Nombres, Revista de filosofía (Córdoba), 10(15), pp. 257-280.

Foucault, M. (2001)La hermenéutica del sujeto. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Freud, S. (1996). El malestar en la cultura. En Obras Completas. Madrid, España: Biblioteca Nueva.(Obra publicada originalmente en 1930).

Freud, S. (1996) La disección de la personalidad psíquica. En Obras Completas. Madrid, España: Biblioteca Nueva.

Lacan, J. (1983). Seminario 2: El yo en la teoría de Freud y en la técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos aires, Argentina: Paidós.(Obra publicada originalmente en1954-1955).

Lacan, J. (2003). La ciencia y la verdad. En Escritos 2(págs. 834-856). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo veintiuno editores.

Lacan, J. (1989). Seminario 11: Los cuatro conceptos fundamentales del psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.(Obra publicada originalmente en1964).

Lacan, J. (2003). Subversión del sujeto y dialéctica del deseo en el inconsciente freudiano. En Escritos 2(págs. 773-807). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo veintiuno editores.

Nietzsche, F. (1997). Así habló Zaratustra: un libro para todos y para nadie. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.(Obra publicada originalmente en1882).

Platón. (2009)Apología de Sócrates. En Diálogos.México, Porrúa.

Platón. (2009)Fedón o del Alma. En Diálogos.México: Porrúa.

Published

2013-06-29

How to Cite

Jaramillo, J. I. (2013). From epiméleia heautu in Socrates to inquisitiveness for the subject in psychoanalysis. Affectio Societatis, 10(18), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.15633