Retrato del artista  James Joyce, adolescente

Mario Elkin Ramírez

doi:10.17533/udea.affs.15639

A portrait of the artist James Joyce as a young man

Authors

Mario Elkin Ramírez University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.15639

Keywords:

phallus, foreclosure, Name-of-Father, sinthome, name, Other

Abstract

The contrast between some lessons in Seminar XXIII of Jacques Lacan with A Portrait of the Artist as a Young

Man by James Joyce, that was one of Lacan's sources, brings about how the work depicts Joyce as a young man, finding the knottings where the foreclosure of the Name of the Father did not allow him to respond and could lead to somedetachments that would trigger his psychosis.Nevertheless, with his work he was graduallybuilding a work that was useful as Sinthome andknotting of his structure.

|Abstract

= 352 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 167 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mario Elkin Ramírez, University of Antioquia

Practicing analyst in Medellín. Professor in the Department of Psychoanalysis at the University of Antioquia. Member of the World Association of Psychoanalysis and of the New Lacanian School-Medellín Headquarters.

References

Joyce, J. (1984) Retrato del artista adolescente. Bogotá: Oveja Negra.

Lacan, J. (2005) Le séminaire, livre XXIII, Le Sinthome. París: Seuil.

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2013-07-01

How to Cite

Ramírez, M. E. (2013). A portrait of the artist James Joyce as a young man. Affectio Societatis, 10(18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.15639

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 18 (2013): Revista Affectio Societatis

Section

Reflection Articles

License

Authors authorize the Journal to publish their academic writings in the Journal’s webpage and in any other printed or electronic media propriety of the Journal, as well as in the databases the Journal is registered in. Affectio Societatis acknowledges that moral rights and decision criteria for the material’s subsequent publication in other media falls exclusively within the author’s authority, who for such cases is prompted to give explicit credit to Affectio Societatis..