Dietetics and morale, medicine and philosophy in Hellenistic Antiquity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.11596Keywords:
dietetics, moral psychology, soul, body, faculties, humoursAbstract
Understanding the moral dimension of Dietetics in antiquity requires researching the advances in medical investigation due to which the basis of Moral Psychology are established. Because of this in this article there is an exploration of some passages of On the Opinions of Hippocrates and Plato, written by the alexandrian physician Galen of Pergamus (I-II a. C). According to the findings of his research into the nature of the soul, even though it has a proper substance, foreign to the humorous mixtures of the body, one must admit that its faculties, including the rational one, can be aided or impeded by the balance or the upsetting of the humours in the body. This is the thesis he will defend in a work he wrote in his mature age, the faculties of the soul follow the temperaments of the body. For Galen, as before for Aristotle and Plato, the form on life which includes nutrition, has an effect on either health or sickness of the soul. In the tradition before him the moral dimension of Dietetics was already accepted, but our thesis is that in the researches of Galen on the physiology of the faculties of the body, we find the empirical base to state that the care of the body has an influence on the health of the soul.
Downloads
References
ANNAS, J. (1992). Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912007
ARISTÓTELES. (2000). Partes de los animales (PA). Marcha de los animales. Movimiento de los animales. (E. Sánchez, & A. Alonso, Trads.) Madrid: Gredos.
BOUDON-MILLOT, V. (2007). Galien. Introduction générale. Sur l´ordre de ses propres livres; Sur ses propres livres; Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe (Vol. I). Paris: Les belles lettres.
DONINI, P. (2008). Psychology. En R. J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.007
FOUCAULT, M. (1984). Historia de la sexualidad (Vol. II. El uso de los placeres). Bs. As.: Siglo XXI Editores.
GALEN. (2000). On Food and Diet. (M. Grant, Trad.) London-New York: Routledge.
GALEN. (2005). On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (PHP). (P. de Lacy, Ed.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH.
GALEN. (1963). On the Passions and Errors of the Soul (Aff. Dig. y Pecc. Dig.). (P. W. Harkins, Trad.) Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
GALEN. (1997). Selected Works. (P. N. Singer, Trad.) New York: Oxford University Press.
GALENO. (1997). De locis affectis: sobre la localización de las enfermedades (Loc. Aff.). (S. A. Aparicio, Trad.) Madrid: Gredos.
GALENO. (2003). Sobre las facultades naturales-Las facultades del alma siguen siendo los temperamentos del cuerpo (QAM y Nat. Fac.). (J. Zaragoza Gras, Trad.) Madrid: Gredos.
GALENO. (2002). Tratados filosóficos y autobiográficos. (T. Martínez, Trad.) Madrid: Gredos.
GALIEN. (1995). L’ âme et ses passions. Les passions et les erreurs de l’ âme. Les facultés de l’ âme suivent les tempéraments du corps. (M. Birchler, Trad.) Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
GOULD, J. B. (1970). The Philosophy of Chrysippus. Albany: State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320369
HANKINSON, R. J. (2008). Epistemology. En R. J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (págs. 157-183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.006
HANKINSON, R. J. (1991). Galen’s Anatomy of the Soul. Phronesis: A Journal of Ancient Philosophy , 36 (2), 197-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852891321052787
HANKINSON, R. J. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541
HIPÓCRATES. (2003). Tratados (Sobre la naturaleza del hombre, Sobre la medicina antigua). Madrid: Gredos.
INWOO D, B. (1985). Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. New York: Oxford University Press.
KOLLESCH, J., & Nickel, D. (Edits.). (1993). Galen und das hellenistische Erbe. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.
LIEBERMAN, H., KANAREK, R. & PRASAD, C. (Edits.). (2005). Nutritional Neuroscience. London, New York: Taylor& Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367800260
LLOYD, G. (2008). Galen and his contemporaries. En R. J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.002
LLOYD, G. (1988). Scholarship, authority and argument in Galen’s Quod animi mores. En P. Manuli, & M. Vegetti (Edits.), Le opere psichologiche di Galeno (págs. 11-42). Pavia: Atti del terzo colloquio galenico internazionale.
LLOYD, G. (1996). Theories and Practices of Demonstration in Galen. En M. Frede, & G. Striker (Edits.), Rationality in Greek Thought (págs. 255-277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LONG, A. (1982). Soul and Body in Stoicism. Phronesis: A Journal of Ancient Philosophy , 27, 34-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852882X00032
LONG, A., & SEDLEY, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers (Vol. 1. Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LONG, A., & SEDLEY, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers (Vol. 2. Greeks and Latin Texts with Notes and Bibliography). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MANULI, P., & VEGETTI, M. (Edits.). (1988). Le opere psichologiche di Galeno. Pavia: Atti del terzo colloquio galenico internazionale 1986.
MORRISON, B. (2008). Logic. En R. J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (págs. 66-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.004
NUSSBAUM, M. (2003). La terapia del deseo. Teoría y práctica en la ética helenística. Barcelona: Paidós.
PLATÓN. (S/A). Diálogos completos (Cármides, Fedón, Fedro, Timeo, República, Gorgias). Madrid: Gredos.
ROCCA, J. (2008). Anatomy. En R. J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (págs. 242-262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.009
ROCCA, J. (2003). Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century AD. Netherlands: Brill Academic Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047401438
SORABJI, R. (2002). Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitatin to Christian Temptation. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256600.001.0001
THIEVEL, A. (2000). L’ évolution du sens de DIAITA. En La lengua científica griega: orígenes, desarrollo e influencia en las lenguas modernas europeas. Madrid: Ediciones clásicas.
TIELEMAN, T. (2003). Chrysippus on Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretations (Philosophia Antiqua). Brill Academic Publisher.
TIELEMAN, T. (1996). Galen and Chrysippus On the Soul: Argument and Refutation in De Placitis Books II-III. Brill Academic Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004320925
TIELEMAN, T. (2008). Methodology. En R. J. Hankinson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen (págs. 49-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.003
VEGETTI, M. (1993). I nervi dell’ anima. En J. Kollesch, & D. Nickel (Edits.), Galen und das hellenistische Erbe (págs. 63-77). Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.
von STADEN, H. (2000). Body, Soul, and Nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and GALEN. En J. P. Wright, & P. Potter, Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment (págs. 79-116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WRIGHT, J. P., & Potter, P. (Edits.). (2003). Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Liliana Cecilia Molina González
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
