The Function of the heraclitean doctrine in the Theetetus

Authors

  • Luis Alonso Gerena Carrillo Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.11607

Keywords:

Heraclitean doctrine, Protagoras, relativism, Plato

Abstract

In this paper I try to show that the function of the Heraclitean doctrine in the Theetetus is to argue for the equivalence between the Protagorean thesis and Theetetus’ first definition “perception is knowledge”, and therefore the doctrine supports the relativity of knowledge. This reading goes against the interpretation according to which Plato introduces this doctrine because he believes it is right about that which is perceptible through the senses; but it goes a step beyond the interpretation which sustains that Plato introduces this doctrine as an ontological thesis to support the Protagorean thesis.

|Abstract
= 222 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 50 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis Alonso Gerena Carrillo, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos

Departamento de Filosofía
Facultad de Humanidades
Morelos, México
luisgerena@yahoo.com.mx

References

ARISTÓTELES (1982) Metafísica, ed., trad. y notas V. García Yebra. Madrid, Gredos.

ARISTÓTELES (1987) Tratados Breves de Historia Natural. Acerca de la Generación y la Corrupción, trad., intr. y nts. E. La Croce, Madrid, Gredos.

BOERI, M. (2006) Platón. Teeteto. Introducción, traducción y notas de Marcelo Boeri. Buenos Aires, Losada.

BOERI, M. (2007) Apariencia y Realidad en el Pensamiento Griego, Buenos Aires, Colihue.

BURNYEAT, M. F. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company.

BURNYEAT, M. F. (1982) Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed, Philosophical Review, 91, 3-43.

CORNFORD, F. M. (1935) Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato. Translated with a commentary. London, Routledge.

CHAPPELL, T. (2005), Reading Plato’s Theaetetus, Indianapolis/ Cambridge, Hackett Publishing Company.

CHERNISS, H. F. (1957) The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato’s Later Dialogues, American Journal of Philology, 78, 225-66.

DUKE, E. A. et al. (1995) Platonis Opera. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.

GERENA, L. et al. (2000) Introducción a la teoría estoica de las pasiones (fragmentos estoicos sobre las pasiones, selección y traducción), Revista Semestral Signos Filosóficos, Departamento de Filosofía, CSH / UAM / Iztapalapa, vol. II, núm. 3, enero-junio, 2000, pp. 181-201.

GERENA, L. et al. (2009) La descripción platónica de la percepción, Revista Ideas y Valores, 139, volumen LVIII, abril.

IRWIN, T. H. (1977) Plato’s Heracliteanism, Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 1-13.

LIDDELL, H. G. and SCOTT, R. (1983) Greek-English Lexikon. Oxford, Oxford at the Clarendon Press.

LONG, A. A. y SEDLEY, D. N. (1997) The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2 vols.

McDOWELL, JOHN (1973) Plato: Theaetetus. Translated with notes. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

SAYRE, K. M. (1969) Plato’s Analytic Method. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

TODD, ROBERT B. (1976) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A study of the De Mixtione, with preliminary essays, text, translations and commentary, en: Philosophia Antiqua, a series of monographs on ancient philosophy, W. J. Verdenius y J. H. Waszink (eds.), vol. XXVIII. Leiden.

PLATÓN (1988) Teeteto. Traducción, introducción y notas A. Vallejo Campos. Madrid, Gredos, v. 5.

Published

2010-04-15

How to Cite

Gerena Carrillo, L. A. (2010). The Function of the heraclitean doctrine in the Theetetus. Estudios De Filosofía, (41), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.11607

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles