The cause of human action according to Alexander of Aphrodisias, Mantissa 23 and De Fato 15

Authors

  • Carlos Natali Dipartimento di Filosofia e Teoria delle Scienze, Università di Venecia, Venecia, Italia

Keywords:

Aristotle, Alexander, deliberation, determinism

Abstract


Carlo Natali’s essay is concerned with closely examining Alexander’s debate with the determinists as well as his reasons to show the crucial role of deliberation in the account of action. Alexander’s starting point is chapter 9 of De interpretatione, text that indicates that Aristotle clearly envisaged the consequences, absurd in his view, of determinism. In his discussion, Natali examines the in uence of Alexander’s arguments on Boetius’commentary on De interpretatione; an aspect particularly remarkable of Natali’s essay is that he shows that Alexander –and previously Aspasius–, even taking for granted the assumed crucial relevance of deliberation in the account of action, modifies in part the Aristotelian theory of deliberation, since he attempts to adapt it to the new cultural situation and the new philosophical debate of his time. Natali notes that Alexander’s apparent incorporation of Stoic terminology and notions (such as that of assent) is part of a clever strategy to fight against the Stoic determinists in their own ground: the crucial point is the deliberation as a central ingredient in the explanation of action, as well as the fact that one is able to choose a thing or something different from it (De fato 178, 22), if that appears preferable.

|Abstract
= 62 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 13 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

ALBERTI, A. “Il volontario e la scelta in Aspasio”, en: Alberti, A. - Sharples, R. W. Aspasius: the earliest extanto commentary on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berlin - New York , 1999.

AMAND, D. (E. Amand de Mendieta). Fatalisme et liberté dans l’antiquité grecque. Louvain, 1945, repr. Amsterdam 1973.

AUBENQUE, P. La prudence chez Aristote. Paris, 1963.

BOBZIEN, S. Determinism and freedom in Stoic philosophy. Oxford, 1998.

DONINI, P. L. Alessandro d’Afrodisia, L’anima. A cura di P. Accattino e P. L. Donini. Roma-Bari, 1996.

DONINI, P. L. Ethos. Aristotele e il determinismo. Alessandria, 1989.

DONINI, P. L. “Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica”, en: Haase, W. - Temporini, H. (hrsg.). Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt. Berlin-New York, T. II, Bd. 36/7, 1994, pp. 5027-5099.

DONINI, P. L. Tre studi sull’aristotelismo del II secolo d.C. Torino, 1974.

GAUTHIER, R. A., Jolif, J. Y. Aristote. L’éthique à Nicomaque. Introd., trad. et comm. Louvain-Paris, 1959, 19702, voll. 4

LONG, A. A. “Stoic determinism and Alexander of Aphrodisias De fato (I-XIV)”, en: Archiv f. Geschichte d. Philosophie 52, 1970, pp. 247-268.

NATALI, C. “Causa formale e causa motrice in Alessandro d’Afrodisia”, en: Movia, G. (a cura di). Alessandro d’Afrodisia e la Metafisica di Aristotele. Milano, 2003, pp. 153-165.

NATALI, C. L’action ef cace. Études sur la philosophie de l’action d’Aristote. Louvain-la-Neuve, 2004.

SHARPLES, R. W. “Alexander of Aphrodisias, ‘De fato’: some parallels”, en: Classical Quarterly 72, 1978, pp. 243-266.

SHARPLES, R. W. Alexander of Aphrodisias: Ethical problems. Transl. London, 1990.

SHARPLES, R. W. Alexander of Aphrodisias. On fate. Text, translation and commentary. London, 1983.

SHARPLES, R. W. Alexander of Aphrodisias: quaestiones. Transl. London, 1992-1994, voll. 2.

SHARPLES, R. W. “Alexander of Aphrodisias: scholasticism and innovation”, en: Haase, W. - Temporini, H. T. II, Bd. 36/2, 1987, pp. 1176-1243.

SHARPLES, R. W. Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement on the soul. Transl. London, 2004.

SHARPLES, R. W. “Responsibility, chence and not-being (Alexander of Aphrodisias mantissa 169-172”, en: Bull. Inst. Classical Studies 22, 1975, pp. 37-64.

SORABJI, R. Preface, a Ammonius, On Aristotle’s De interpretatione IX. Transl. by D. Blank e N. Kretzamnn. London, 1998.

VERBEKE, G. “Aristotélisme et stoïcisme dans le ‘De fato d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise”, en: Archiv f. Geschichte d. Philosophie 50, 1968, pp. 73-100.

ZIERL, A. Alexander von Aphrodisias. Über das Schicksal. Üb. u. kmm. Berlin, 1995.

Published

2009-07-16

How to Cite

Natali, C. (2009). The cause of human action according to Alexander of Aphrodisias, Mantissa 23 and De Fato 15. Estudios De Filosofía, (40), 159–181. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/11620

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.