The reception of Aristotle’s theory of chance in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ De Fato

Authors

  • Alberto Ross Hernández Facultad de Filosofía, Universidad Panamericana México D.F., México

Keywords:

Aristotle, Alexander, chance, first mover

Abstract


this paper deals with the reception and transformation of Aristotle’s theory of chance and causality in one of the fundamental works of ancient aristotelism: Alexander of Aphrodisias’ De Fato. Ross suggests a continuity between Aristotle and Alexander in some of the most important tenets of Alexander’s proposal. Ross points out some of the most significant differences between the two philosophers in the context of a more general discussion on the relation between the physical world and the metaphysical entities. According to Ross, Alexander introduced some notions into the Aristotelian philosophy, such as “fate” and “providence”, which are entirely alien to Aristotle’s original theses and diverge from the words of the Master in more than one occasion, even though he attributes to him his own doctrine. Finally, Ross attempts to show that there is a tension between the traditional reading of Metaphysics XII –inspired in Alexander– and some theses of Alexander’s De Fato. The view that the First Mover presents itself as something desirable and understandable to the first heaven, which moves in a circle to imitate the actuality of that which is presented as desireable and whose only activity is thinking of itself, is inspired, according to Ross, precisely Alexander.

|Abstract
= 56 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 26 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ediciones y traducciones de textos antiguos y medievales

DE AFRODISIA, A. On Fate. R. W. Sharples (ed.). Duckworth, 2003.

DE AFRODISIA, A. Quaestiones 1.1-2.15. R. W. Sharples (ed.). Cornell University Press, 1992.

DE AFRODISIA, A. Quaestiones 2.16-3.15. R. W. Sharples (ed.). Cornell University Press, 1994.

DE AFRODISIA, A. Sobre el destino. Trad. de José Molina y Ricardo Salles. Promanuscrito, 2008.

DE AFRODISIA, A. Traité de la providence. P. Thillet (ed.). Verdier, 2003.

DE AQUINO, S. T. In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edición y estudio de R. M. Spiazzi. Marietti, 1964.

ARISTÓTELES. Física I-II. Trad. y comentario de Marcelo Boeri. Biblos, 1993.

ARISTÓTELES. Física VII-VIII. Trad. y comentario de Marcelo Boeri. Biblos, 2003.

ARISTOTLE. Metaphysica. Ed. y comentario de D. Ross. Oxford University Press, 1924.

ARISTOTLE. Physica. Ed. y comentario de D. Ross. Oxford University Press, 1936.

FILOPÓNO. On Aristotle’s Physics 2. Trad. de A. Lacey. Duckworth, 1993.

SIMPLICIO. On Aristotle’s Physics 2. Trad. de D. B. Fleet. Duckworth, 1997.

TEMISTIO. In Aristotelis Metaphysicorum librum XII paraphrasis hebraice et latine. Reimer, 1903.

Secundaria

BERTI, E. “Il movimento del cielo in Alessandro di Afrodisia”, en: Brancacci, A. (ed.). La filosofia in età imperiale. Le scuole e le tradizioni filosofiche. Napoli, 2000, pp. 225-243.

BERTI, E. “La Causalità del Motore Immobile secondo Aristotele”, en: Gregorianum 83/4, 2002, pp. 637-654.

BERTI, E. “Metaphysics L 6”, en: Frede, M. y Charles, D. Symposium Aristotelicum. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda. Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 181-206.

BOERI, M. “Una aproximación a la noción aristotélica de Dios”, en: Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe 6, 1999, pp. 63-89.

BRADSHAW, D. “A new look at the Prime Mover”, en: Journal of History of Philosophy 39/1, 2001, pp. 1-22.

BRANCACCI, A. (ed.). La filosofia in età imperiale. Le scuole e le tradizioni filosofiche. Napoli, 2000.

BROADIE, S. “Que fait le premier moteur d’Aristote?”, en : Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 183, 1993, pp. 375-411.

ELDERS, L. Aristotle’s theology. A commentary on book lambda of the Metaphysics. Assen, 1972.

FREDE, M. AND CHARLES, D. (eds.) Symposium Aristotelicum. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda. Oxford University Press, 2000.

GILL, M. AND LENNOX, J. (eds.). Self motion: from Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, 1994.

JUDSON, L. “Heavenly motion and the Unmoved Mover”, en: Gill, M. – Lennox, J. Self motion: from Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, 1994, pp. 155-171.

KOSMAN, A. “Aristotle’s Prime Mover”, en: Gill, M. – Lennox, J. Self motion: from Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, 1994, pp. 135-153.

MENN, S. “Aristotle and Plato on God”, en: Review of Metaphysics 45/3, 1992, pp. 543-573.

NATALI, C. “Causa motrice e causa finale nel libro Lambda della Metafisica de Aristotele”, en: Méthexis X, 1999, pp. 105-123.

REALE, G. La metafísica di Aristotele. Nápoli, Luigi Loffredo, 1968.

ROSS, A. Dios, eternidad y movimiento en Aristóteles. Pamplona, EUNSA, 2007.

SHARPLES, R. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Divine Providence: Two Problems”,en: The Classical Quarterly 32-1, 1982, pp. 198-211.

SORABJI, R. Aristotle transformed: the ancient commentators and their influence. Duckworth, 1990.

Published

2009-07-16

How to Cite

Ross Hernández, A. (2009). The reception of Aristotle’s theory of chance in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ De Fato. Estudios De Filosofía, (40), 183–198. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/11621

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.