The Transcendental Motive in Kant and Husserl
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12674Keywords:
transcendental, transcendental idealism, regulative ideal, transcendental subjectivity, reflection, experience, Kant, HusserlAbstract
The article explores the sense in which both Kant and Husserl understand the Transcendental and the importance of this concept for their respective philosophies. The author investigates this relation with the aim of showing that both philosophies start from a radical reflection on the Conditions of Possibility of Experience, arriving at different conclusions on it. The article also reviews the consequences of establishing a Transcendental Philosophy and the enormous difference between Kant’s and Husserl’s points of view on Experience as the articulator of the Transcendental in their own philosophies.
Downloads
References
ALLISON, Henry E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, An Interpretation and Defence. Yale University Press, New Haven /London, 1983.
ALLISON, Henry E. “Transcendental Idealism: A Retrospective,” in: Idealism and Freedom, Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, pp. 3-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172875.003
BENNET, Jonathan. La crítica de la razón pura de Kant, 1. La Analítica (traducción del inglés por A. Montesinos). Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1980 (primera reimpresión).
BERNET, Rudolf. La vie du sujet. Recherches sur l’interprétation de Husserl dans la phénoménologie. PUF, Paris, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.berne.1994.01
CASSIRER, Ernst. Kant, vida y doctrina. FCE, México, 1968 (segunda edición), 1948 (primera edición) (PUC)
FINDLAY, John Niemeyer. Kant and the Transcendental Object: A hermeneutic Study. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246381.001.0001
GIDEON, Abram. Der Begriff Transcendental in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1977.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Crisis de las ciencias europeas y la fenomenología trascendental. Crítica, Barcelona, 1991.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. FCE, Madrid, 1992.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Lógica formal y trascendental. Ensayo de una crítica de la razón lógica. UNAM, México D. F., 1962.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Meditaciones cartesianas. Ediciones paulinas, Madrid, 1979.
KERN, Iso. “Los tres caminos hacia la reducción fenomenológica trascendental en la filosofía de Edmund Husserl.”, en La posibilidad de la fenomenología. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, 1997.
MEERBOTE, Ralf. “Kant’s Refutation of Problematic Material Idealism,” in: Ouden, Bernard den, (ed.) New Essays on Kant, American University Studies, Serie V, 1987, pp. 111-138.
KANT, Inmanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781-1787), Tomo IV de: Kants Werke (Königlich preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften). G. Keimer Verlag, Berlin, 1910-1969 (XXIII tomos) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112610046
KANT, Inmanuel. Crítica de la razón pura (traducción y notas de Pedro Ribas). Ediciones Alfaguara S.A., Madrid, 1985 (cuarta edición), 1988 (sexta edición).
KANT, Inmanuel. La disertación de 1770: Sobre la forma y el principio del mundo sensible y del inteligible (introducción y traducción de Ramón Ceñal, S.J.). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid (Serie Instituto Luis Vives de Filosofía - Textos y Monografías, volumen 1), 1961
KANT, Inmauel. ¿Por qué no es inútil una nueva Crítica de la razón pura? (Respuesta a Eberhardt) (traducción del alemán por Alfonso Castaño Piñán). Aguilar, Buenos Aires, 1973.
LANDGREBE, Ludwig. El camino de la fenomenología. El problema de una experiencia originaria. Traducción de Mario A. Presas. Sudamericana, Buenos Aires, 1968.
MUGUERZA, Javier y RODRIGUEZ A., Roberto (eds). Kant después de Kant (en el Bicentenario de la Crítica de la Razón Pura). Tecnos, Madrid, 1989.
RÁBADE ROMEO, Sergio. Kant, problemas gnoseológicos de la Crítica de la razón pura. Madrid, 1969.
RÁBADE ROMEO, Sergio y otros. Kant, conocimiento y racionalidad, el uso teórico de la razón. Cincel, Madrid, 1987.
RIZO-PATRÓN de LERNER, Rosemary, “Evidencia versus crítica: el debate de Husserl con Descartes y Kant,” en: Actas del segundo simposio de estudiantes de filosofía. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas, Lima, 2004, pp. 179-195.
RIZO-PATRÓN de LERNER, Rosemary. “Fundación de validez y crítica trascendental de la experiencia: Debate de Husserl con el cartesianismo y el neo-kantismo” en: Rizo-Patrón, R. (ed.), Acta Fenomenológica Latinoamericana, Volumen I, PUCP, Lima, 2003, pp. 143-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/9789972426193.009
RIZO-PATRÓN de LERNER, Rosemary, “The Intuitive Foundations of Rationality”, en: Cheung, Chan-Fai, Ivan Chvatik, Ion Copoeru, Lester Embree, Julia Iribarne, & Hans-Rainer Sepp, editors, Essays in Celebration of the Founding of the Organization of Phenomenological Organizations, N° 50, 2003: http://www.o-p-o.net/pragueessaylist.html
RIZO-PATRÓN de LERNER, Rosemary. “Lógica formal y lógica trascendental en Kant y en Husserl”, en: Criado, Roberto y Rosales, Diógenes (eds.) Ciclo de conferencias sobre “Lógica formal y lógica no-formal (15-18 noviembre 2001)”. PUCP – Estudios Generales Letras, Lima, 2002, pp. 43-65.
SMITH, Norman K. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Humanities Press, New Jersey, 1984 (una reimpresión de 1923, segunda edición revisada y ampliada). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04491-7_1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Jaime Javier Villanueva Barreto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
