Verosimilitude and the epistemic status of scientific theories


  • Carlos Emilio García Duque Universidad de Caldas



Popper, verisimilitude, epistemic status, scientfic theories, scientific knowledge


In this paper, I examine the problem of the epistemic status of scientific theories from the point of view of Poppers epistemology. Starting with the controversial statement “no scientific theory is true”, (A) which is a good candidate to express in a synthetic way certain fundamental implications of Poppers theory of verisimilitude, I analyze some criticisms against the fallibbilist view of science and suggest ways of adequately developing the meaning of (A), together with the meaning of other statements from the same family. I shall argue that only by means of these statements can we develop a good understanding of the scientific enterprise, and that they do not represent the collapse of epistemology. In addition, I shall show how to give a construal of these statements in such a way that they remain immune to the commonest criticisms. Furthermore, I shall examine the sense of the locution “scientific knowledge” with the purpose of showing that it is not advisable to interpret it according to the traditional sense of the word “knowledge”. I shall conclude that if we give a nuanced construal of (A) and its relatives, we will be in a better position to obtain a functional representation of the business of science.

= 206 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 56 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carlos Emilio García Duque, Universidad de Caldas

Grupo de Investigación Tántalo
Departamento de Filosofía
Facultad de Artes y Humanidades
Universidad de Caldas
Manizales, Colombia


GARCÍA, C. Popper’s Theory of Science: An Apologia. Continuum Books, London, 2006.

LEWIS, D. Languages and language, en: Martinich, A. P. (ed.). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.

POPPER, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London, 1959.

____________. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge & K., London, 1963.

____________. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.

____________. Realism and the Aim of Science. Hutchinson, London, 1983.

____________. In search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years. Routledge, New York, 1992.



How to Cite

García Duque, C. E. (2008). Verosimilitude and the epistemic status of scientific theories. Estudios De Filosofía, (36), 9–24.



Original or Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.