Dominance and servitude. Hegel's criticism of Fichte in the paper on the Difference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.12821Keywords:
Fichte, nature, reason, natural right, dominion, submission.Abstract
This article is a revision of the criticism that Hegel makes to conception of nature that underlies Fichtes Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. In Hegel's Differences Between the Philosophical System of Fichte and Schelling (1801), Hegel directs his reflection to the relation between Dominance and Submission that Fichte's Philosophy establishes between Reason and Nature. And this to such a degree, that it turns out to be the base for the deduction of Natural Right, whose main purpose is to show the possibility of Auto-conscience and, with it, that of the Human Community in general. Hegel shows that Fichte's deduction is contradictory, and from his critique he will lay down a new concept of Nature.
Downloads
References
Cortés, F. “La ética de la autoconservación y la teoría de los deberes políticos en el Leviatán de Hobbes”, en: Arelé, vol. XIV, No. 1,2002, pp. 5-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.200201.001
Fichte, J. G. (1796). Grundlage des Naturrechts nach Prinzipien der Wissenschaftslehre. Alemania, Felix Meiner, 1979.
_____________. System der Sittenlehre nach den Prinzipien der W issenschaftslehre. Hamburg, Meiner, 1995.
Hegel, G. W. F. "Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie“, en: Hegel, Jenaer Schriften 1801-1807. Werke 2. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1986.
____________ . "Der Geist zum Christentums und sein Schicksal“, en: Hegel. Frühe Schriften. Werke 1. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1986.
____________ . "Über die wissenschaftlichen Behandlungsarten des Naturrechts, seine Stelle in der praktischen Philosophie und sein Verhältnis zu den positiven Rechtswissenschaften“, en: Hegel. Jenaer Schriften 1801-1807, Werke 2. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
____________ . Glauben und Wissen. Hamburg, Meiner, 1986.
____________ . Diferencia entre los sistemas de filosofía de Fichte y Schelling. Madrid, Tecnos, 1990.
Ilting, K. "Hegels Auseinandersetzung mit der aristotelischen Politik“, en: Philosophische Rundschau. München, Karl Alberg, 1963/64, pp. 38-58.
Jamme, Christoph. “Hegels Naturaufassung in Frankfurt”, en: Vieweg, Klaus (ed.). Hegels Jenaer Naturphilosophie. München, Fink, 1998.
____________ . ."Jedes Lieblose ist Gewalt'. Derjunge Hegel, Hölderlin und die Dialektik der Aufklärung“, en: Jamme, Christoph; Schneider, Helmut (eds.). Der Weg zum System. Material ien zum jungen Hegel. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1990, pp. 130-170.
Kant. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1991.
Kimmerle, Heinz., "Natur und Geschichte beim Jungen Hegel“, en: Vieweg, Klaus (ed.): Hegels Jenaer Naturphilosophie. München, Fink, 1998.
Nuzzo, Angelica. "Natur und Freiheit in Hegels Philosophie der Jenaer Zeit (bis 1803)“, en: Vieweg, Klaus (ed.). Hegels Jenaer Naturphilosophie. München, Fink, 1998.
Pöggeler, Otto. "Hegels Philosophische Anfänge“, en: Jamme, Christoph; Schneider, Helmut (eds.). Der Wegzum System. Materialien zumjungen Hegel. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1990.
Riedel, Manfred. "Hegels Kritik des NaturTechts“, en: Hegel-Studien. Vol. 4. Bonn, 1967, pp. 177-204.
Siep, Ludwig. Anerkennung als Prinzip derpraktischen Philosophie. Untersuchungen zu Hegels Jenaer Philosophie des Geistes. Freiburg, München, 1979.
Wildt, Andreas. Autonomie und Anerkennung. Hegels Moralitätskritik im Lichte seiner Fichte-Rezeption. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1982.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Carlos Emel Rendón Arroyave
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
