Another turn of the screw on Dennett and artifactual hermeneutics: tensions and aporias


  • Diego Lawler Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF)
  • Diego Parente Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata



Hermeneutics, Technical Artifacts, Dennett, Normativity, Technical function.


This work focuses on the application to technical artefact of the philosophical approach proposed by Daniel Dennett to elucidate the field of artificial things. In particular, it suggests two things. Firstly, that this application does not allow us to fully understand the normative dimension that covers the practical sphere of our production and use of technical artefact. Secondly, that this application promotes a very liberal approach on attribution of functions to technical artefact that makes unrecognisable the very idea of technical function. This paper is composed of three sections. The first one characterizes the artifactual hermeneutics promoted by Dennett’s approach. It analyses the stance of reverse engineering, the physical one and the design and intentional stance respectively. The second part discusses the analogy between texts and artefact and reconstructs the strategy embedded in this analogy. The last part presents a critical assessment of Dennett’s proposal regarding its application to the field of technical artefact.

= 378 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 81 veces|


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Diego Lawler, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF)

Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICET
Buenos Aires, Argentina

Diego Parente, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata

Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICET
Departamento de Filosofía
Facultad de Humanidades
Mar del Plata, Argentina


BIJKER, W. (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge: MIT Press.

BIJKER, W. & PINCH, T. (1987) “The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might bene t each other”, en: W. Bijker, T. Hughes y T. Pinch (Eds.). The social construction of technological systems, Cambridge: MIT Press.

CHEMERO, A. (2009) Radical embodied cognitive science, Londres: MIT Press. DOI:

DENNETT, D. (1996) Kinds of Minds, Londres: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.

DENNETT, D. (1995) Darwin ́s Dangereous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Nueva York: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

DENNETT, D. (1990) “The Interpretation of Texts, People and other Artifacts”, en: Philosophy and Phenomenology Research, 1, Supp. Fall 1990, pp. 177-193. DOI:

DENNETT, D. (1987) The Intentional Stance, New York: Basil Blackwell.

DENNETT, D. (1978) Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, Hassocks: Harverster Press.

ECO, U. (1995) Interpretación y sobreinterpretación, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

GIBSON, J. J. (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception, New Jersey: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.

GRINT, K. & WOOLGAR, S. (1992) “Computers, Guns, and Roses: What’s Social about Being Shot?”, en: Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, No. 3, pp. 366-380. DOI:

MARR, D. (1985) Una investigación basada en el cálculo acerca de la representación y el procesamiento humano de la información visual, Madrid: Alianza.

MILLER, D. (1994) “Artefacts and the meaning of things”, en: Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, Tim Ingold (Ed.), Londres & Nueva York: Routledge.

RICOEUR, P. (2001) Del texto a la acción, Buenos Aires: F.C.E.

THOMASSON, A. (2003) “Realism and human kinds”, en: Philosophy and phenomenological research, vol. LXVII, 3, pp. 580-609. DOI:

TOMASELLO, M. (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI:

VAESEN, K. & VAN AMEONGEN, M. (2008) “Optimality vs. intent: Limitations of Dennett’s artefact hermeneutics”, en: Philosophical Psychology, 21, 779-797. DOI:

VERMAAS, P. et al. (2011) “The design stance and its artefacts”, en: Synthese, 2011, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-9885-9. DOI:

WIMSATT, W. & BEARDSLEY, M. (1954) “The Intentional Fallacy”, en: The Verbal Icon, Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press.



How to Cite

Lawler, D., & Parente, D. (2013). Another turn of the screw on Dennett and artifactual hermeneutics: tensions and aporias. Estudios De Filosofía, (47), 83–106.



Original or Research articles