Form as subject: A slip in Aristotle? Eidos as subject and guarantor of identity

Authors

  • Claudia Patricia Carbonell Fernández Universidad de La Sabana

Keywords:

Aristotle, subject, substance (οὐσἰα), form (εἶδος), matter, predicate. *

Abstract


In this text I argue in favor of considering the form (εἶδος) as subject and therefore as responsible for the identity of the object through movement. I contemplate the priority of the form as substance, its particular character, and the different ways in which something can be a subject, this, in order to conclude why in Z, 3, form is the best candidate to be not only substance, but to be subject in a primary sense. The purpose of the text is to address the discussion as to why form, rather than matter or the composite, best fits the ontological criteria of being subject and the philosophical consequences of this position. As a corollary, I will make some comments on the dual ontology that Aristotle follows from Categories or Metaphysics.

|Abstract
= 174 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 62 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Claudia Patricia Carbonell Fernández, Universidad de La Sabana

G.I. Racionalidad y Cultura Departamento de Filosofía Facultad de Filosofía y Ciencias Humanas Bogotá, Colombia E-mail: claudia.carbonell@unisabana.edu.co

References

ACKRILL, J. L. (1963) Aristotle’s definition of psyche. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 73, pp. 119-133. Reimpreso en J. L. Ackrill, Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997, pp. 163-178.

ACKRILL, J. L. (1963) Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

ALBRITTON, R. (1957) Form of particular substances in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Journal of Philosophy, 54, pp. 699-708.

ANNAS, J. (1974) Individuals in Aristotle’s Categories: Two Queries. Phronesis, 19, pp. 146-152.

AQUINO, Tomás. (2012) Sententia libri Metaphysicae (sitio en internet). Disponible en: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/cmp07.html. Acceso el 28-XI-2012.

ARISTOTELIS. (1831) Opera. Ed. I. Bekker, vol. 1 und 2.

ARISTOTLE. (1966) Categoriae et Liber de interpretatione. Ed. L. Minio Paluello, Oxford, Clarendon.

ARISTOTLE. (1956) De Anima. Ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford, Clarendon.

ARISTÓTELES. (1978) Acerca del alma. Trad. T. Calvo Martínez, Madrid, Gredos.

ARISTÓTELES. (1970) Metafísica. Ed. trilingüe y trad. V. García-Yebra, Madrid, Gredos.

ARISTÓTELES. (1994) Metafísica. Trad. T. Calvo Martínez, Madrid, Gredos.

BONITZ, H. (1960) Aristotelis Metaphysica. Olms, Hildesheim.

BONITZ, H. (1969) Aristotelisches Studien. Olms, Hildesheim.

BOSTOCK, D. (1994) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Books Z and H, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

BUCHHEIM, T. (2008) “Dancing Matter” and the Stable Form. Remarks on Substance and Form in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18, pp. 1-21.

BURNYEAT, M. (2001) Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh, Mathesis.

BURNYEAT, M. et al. (1979) Notes on Zeta. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

CARBONELL, C. (2007) Movimiento y forma en Aristóteles. Pamplona, Eunsa.

CHARLES, D. (2002) Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

CHARLTON, W. (1972) Aristotle and the principle of individuation. Phronesis, 17, pp. 239-249.

CODE, A. (2000) Some remarks on Metaphysics L 5. En: Charles D. & Frede, M. (Eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda. Oxford, Clarendon.

CODE, A. (1985) The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10, pp. 41-65.

DUMOULIN, B. (1983) L’ousia dans les Catégories et dans la Métaphysique. En: Moreaux, P., Wiesner, J. (Eds.) Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum: Studien zu einigen Dubia. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 57-72.

DRISCOLL, J. (1981) Eidê in Aristotle’s Earlier and Later Theories of Substance. En: O’Meara, D. J. (Ed.), Studies in Aristotle. Catholic University of America, Washington, pp. 129-159.

DRISCOLL, J. (1981) Eidê in Aristotle’s Earlier and Later Theories of Substance. En: O’Meara, D. J. (Ed.), Studies in Aristotle. Catholic University of America, Washington, pp. 129-159.

FREDE, M. (1985) Substance in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. En: Gotthelf, A. (Ed.) Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Pittsburgh, Mathesis, pp. 17-26.

FREDE, M. (1987) Individuals in Aristotle. Essays in ancient philosophy. Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 49-71.

FREDE, M. y PATZIG, G. (1988) Aristoteles ‘Metaphysik Z’. Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Bd. I-II, München, Beck.

FURTH, M. (1988) Substance, Form and Psyche: an Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

GALLAGHER, R. (2011) Aristotle on Eidei Diapherontoi. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19 (3), pp. 363-384.

GARAY, J. (1987) Los sentidos de la forma en Aristóteles. Pamplona, Eunsa.

GILL, M.L. (2005) Aristotle’s Metaphysics reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 43 (3), pp. 223-251.

INCIARTE, F. (1970) Forma Formarum. Strukturmomente der Thomistischen Seinslehre im Rückgriff auf Aristoteles. Freiburg-München, K. Alber.

INCIARTE, F. (1989) Für und wider den Nominalismus. Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 1989, pp. 382-393.

INCIARTE, F. (2004) Tiempo, sustancia, lenguaje. En: L. Flamarique (Ed.), Ensayos de Metafísica. Pamplona, Eunsa.

JAEGER, W. (1923) Aristoteles. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin, Weidmannsche.

LLOYD, G. E. R. (1968) Aristotle: the growth and structure of his thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

LOUX, M. J. (1979) Form, Species, and Predication in Metaphysics Z, H and Q. Mind 88, pp. 1-23.

LOUX, M. J. (1991) Primary Ousia. An Essay on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z and H. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

OWEN, G. E. L. (1965) The Platonism of Aristotle. En: Proceedings of the British Academy, 50, reimpreso en Barnes et al., Articles on Aristotle, vol. 1, pp. 14-34.

PASNAU, R. (2011) Metaphysical Themes: 1274-1671. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

PATZIG, G. (1987) Das Programm von M und seine Ausführung. En: Graeser, A. (Ed.), Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle: Akten d. 10. Symposium Aristotelicum (Sigriswil, 1984). Stuttgart, Verlag Haupt, pp. 113-130.

PELLEGRIN, P. (1985) Aristotle: A Zoology without Species. En: A. Gotthelf (Ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Pittsburgh, Mathesis.

RAPP, C. (Ed.) (1996) Metaphysik: Die Substanzbücher (Z, H, Q). Berlin, Akademie.

ROSS, W. D. (ed.) (1966) Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Vol. I-II. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

SCALTSAS, T. CHARLES, D. y GILL, M. L. (Eds.) (1994) Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

SELLARS, W. (1957) Substance and Form in Aristotle. Journal of Philosophy, 54, pp. 688-698.

SHIELDS, C. (1988) Soul as Subject in Aristotle De Anima. Classical Quarterly, 38, pp. 140-149.

WEDIN, M. V. (2000) Aristotle’s Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Z. New York, Oxford University Press.

WITT, C. (1989) Substance and Essence in Aristotle. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

WUNDT, M. (1953) Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer.

WOODS, M. (1993) Form, Species and Predication in Aristotle. Synthese, 96, pp. 399-415.

Published

2013-07-04

How to Cite

Carbonell Fernández, C. P. (2013). Form as subject: A slip in Aristotle? Eidos as subject and guarantor of identity. Estudios De Filosofía, (48), 49–72. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudios_de_filosofia/article/view/18346

Issue

Section

Original or Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.