The problems on method in Aristotle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.335675Keywords:
Aristotle, method, theory, practice, epistemeAbstract
This paper provides an introductory overview of what Aristotle's interpreters dealing with the question of method in his work have been discussing as the main problem to be solved: the problem regarding the relation between Aristotle's theory of demonstrative science (as staled in the Posterior Analytics) and Aristotle 's research praxis (as displayed in his own scientific treatises), a praxis which interpreters often describe as dialectic.
Downloads
References
ARISTÓTELES. Tratados de Lógica (Órganon). Introducciones, traducciones y notas de Miguel Candel Sanmartín, Madrid: Editorial Gredos, 2 vols., 1982,1988.
Aristotle Topics Books I and VIII. Traducción y comentario de Robin Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00258598
Aristóteles Analytica Posteriora. Traducida y anotada por Wolfgang Detel, Berlín: Akademie Verlag, 2 vols. (Aristoteles Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, ed. por Emst Grumach, vol. 6).
ARISTÓTELES. Metafisica. Edición trilingüe por Valentín García Yebra, Madrid: Editorial Gredos, 1982 (segunda edición revisada).
________. Ética Nicomáquea. Ética Endemia. Introducción por Emilio Lledó Iñigo, traducción y notas por Julio Pallí Bonet, Madrid: Editorial Gredos, 1985.
_______ . Ética Nicomáquea. Política. Traducción e introducción de Antonio Gómez Robledo, Mexico: Editorial Porrúa, 1998.
ARISTOTLE. Nichomachean Ethics. Traducción, introducción y notas de Terence Irwin, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1985.
ARISTÓTELES. Nikomachische Ethik. Traducción y notas de Franz Dirlmeier, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1960 (2 aedición, corregida).
BARNES, Jonathan (1969). Aristotle's Theory of Demonstration, en: Phronesis 14,123-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852869X00091
_____________. (1987). Aristóteles. Madrid: Cátedra.
_____________. (1994). Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Traducción y
comentario de J. Bames, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BERTI, Enrico (1996). Does Aristotle’s Conception of Dialectic Develop? en: WIANS, William (ed). Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects. Lanham (Maryland): Rowmann & Littlefield Publishers, p. 105-130.
BONTTZ (1870). Aristotelis Opera. Ex recensione Immanue H Bekkeri, Berlin: edidit Academia Regia Bomssica, Walter de Gruyter, 1960 (2a ed.), 5 vols. Vol. 5: Index Aristotelicus. (Ed. H. Bonitz).
DETEL, Wolfgang (1993). Aristoteles Analytica Posteriora. Übersetzt und erläutert von Wolfgang Detel, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2 vols. (Aristoteles Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, hrsg. von Helmut Flashar, Bd. III, Teil II).
HEINIMANN, Felix (1976). Eine vorplatonische Theorie der TEXNH, en: CLASSEN, Carl J. (ed). Sophistik. Darmstadt, p. 127-169.
HINTIKKA, Jaakko (1972). On the Ingredients of an Aristotelian Science, en: Nous 6, p. 55- 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2214513
IRWIN, Terence (1988). Aristotle's First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KULLMANN, Wolfgang (1965). Zurwissenchaftlichen Methode des Aristoteles, en: Hellmut Flashar y Konrad Gaiser (eds). Festgabefür Wolfgang Schadewaldt. Neske, 247-274.
Le BLOND, J.M. (1939). Logique etméthode chez Aristote. Vrin, París, 1970.
LLOYD, G.E.R. (1996). Aristotelian Explorations. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press.
MELÉNDEZ, Germán (1998). Dialéctica y ciencia en Aristóteles, en: Ideas y Valores, p. 108, 87-107.
OWEN, GwilE. L. (1961). Tithenai ta phainomena, en: MORAVCSIK, J.M.E. (ed). Aristotle. A Collection of Critical Essays. Londres/Melboume, 1968, p. 167-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15267-4_9
REEVE, C.D.C. (1995). Practices of Reason, Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198235651.001.0001
ROBINSON, Richard (1953). Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. SAMARANCH, F. (1999). El saber del deseo: Releer a Aristóteles. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
SMITH, Robin (1989). Prior Analytes. Traducción, introducción, notas y comentarios de Robin Smith, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
_______ (1993). What Use is Aristotle’s Organon? En: Proceeding of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 9, p. 261-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2213441793X00158
TAYLOR, C.C.W. (1990). Aristotle’s Epistemology, en: EVERSON, Stephen (ed). Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 116-142.
Van FRAASEN, Bas C. (1980). A Re-examination of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Science, en: Dialogue 19, p. 20-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300024719
VLASTOS, Gregory (1994). Socratic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SMITH, Robin (1995). Logic, en: BARNES J. (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press, p. 27-65.
WIANS, William (1989). Demostration and Teaching, en: Ancient Philosophy 9, p. 245-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil1989926
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2001 Germán Meléndez Acuña
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
