Beyond instrumental rationality. For a critical theory of freedom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n63a05Keywords:
human freedom, rationalization, instrumental rationality, value rationality, critical theory, critique of capitalismAbstract
This article will provide an illustration of Max Weber’s theory of rationalization with a specific impetus on its interdependency with the development of capitalism. Following Horkheimer, I shall critically draw on Weber to outline a theory of human freedom, showing that rationalization not only implies economic and social liberation but entails a totalizing tendency that invades all spheres of socio-political life including people’s mental infrastructure. This mental colonization can be framed as a process of substituting value rationality with instrumental rationality. I will claim that this substitution can be understood as an impediment for human freedom. Following contemporary theories of action (Anscombe, Foot), I will show the centrality of value orientation for understanding human freedom. Therefore, I propose a critical theory of freedom that centers value rational action as realization of freedom and can be understood as emancipative.
Downloads
References
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1017/S000318191000037943
Anscombe, G.E.M. (1981). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind (Collected Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2.). Oxford University Press.
Anscombe, G.E.M. (1981). Ethics, Religion and Politics (Collected Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3). Oxford University Press.
Bonefeld, W. (2020). Capital Par Excellence: On Money as an obscure thing. Estudios de Filosofía, 62, 33-56. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n62a03
Del Aguila Marchena, L. (2020). Crítica marxiana de la igualdad en la ciudadanía moderna. Estudios de Filosofía 62, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n62a02
Foot, P. (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198235089.001.0001
Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1982). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Suhrkamp.
Horkheimer, M. (1937). Zur Anthropologie des bürgerlichen Zeitalters. Sieben Aufsätze von Max
Horkheimer aus der Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. Kohlhammer.
Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical Theory. Selected Essays (Matthew J. O’Connell, Trans.). Continuum Publishing.
Horkheimer, M. (2004). Eclipse of reason. Continuum.
Horkheimer, M. (2007). Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft. Übersetzt von Alfred Schmidt. Fischer Taschenbuch.
Horkheimer, M. (2012). Critique of instrumental reason (J. O’Conell and others, Trans). Verso.
Illies, C. (2003). The Grounds of Ethical Judgement. New transcendental arguments in Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238324.001.0001
Kant, I. (1974). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Band 3 und 4). Suhrkamp (KrV).
Kant, I. (1974). Kritik der Urteilskraft (Band 10). Suhrkamp (KdU).
Kant, I. (1977). Metaphysik der Sitten (Band 8). Suhrkamp (MS).
Kant, I. (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. In P. Guyer, & A. W. Wood (Eds. & Trans), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2000). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Band 7). Suhrkamp (KpV).
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (Allen W. Wood, Ed. & Trans). Yale University Press.
Löwith, K. (2003). Max Weber and Karl Marx (T. Bottomore & W. Outhwaite, Eds. & Introduction). Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Randall, C. (1980). Weber’s Last Theory of Capitalism: A Systematization. American Sociological Review 45(6), 925-942. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094910
Weber, M. (1923). Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Duncker und Humblot.
Weber, M. (1950). General Economic History (Frank H. Knight, Trans). Illinois.
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Mohr und Siebeck.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An outline for interpretative Sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds. & Trans). University of California Press.
Weber, M. (2005). The protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. (T. Parsons, Trans.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995808
Weber, M. (2006). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Beck.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jana Katharina Funk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
