Ernst Bloch’s religion without God as an outline of critical philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n62a04Keywords:
Ernst Bloch, anticapitalism, Kant, critique, religion, atheismAbstract
One of the most original features of Ernst Bloch’s philosophy is the mixture of religious elements with an emancipation theory rooted in Marxism. However, his philosophy of religion is expressed in an unconventional way. It inherits the best products of the German soul in order to overcome the pessimism of the fin-de-siècle philosophies and revive the emancipatory struggles. This article explores the forms of
expression of this thought in Bloch’s early philosophy through the analysis of his claim for “religion without God”, and against all vulgar atheism that abolishes the experience of human inwardness. In this context, the theological concept of the “invisible Church” is presented as Bloch’s way of anchoring the anti-capitalist and anti-militarist struggle in a strong symbolic content that would serve as its base and reserve of energies. The paper concludes that, at the heart of Bloch’s project, there is a radical critique of the economic system and a search for radical alternatives to it.
Downloads
References
Baur, F. C. (1867). Lehrbuch der christlichen Dogmengeschichte. Fues: Leipzig.
Bloch, E. (1909). Kritische Erörterung über Rickert, und das Problem der Erkenntnistheorie. Ludwigshafen am Rhein: Baur.
Bloch, E. (1923). Durch die Wüste, Kritische Essays. Berlin: Paul Cassirer.
Bloch, E. (1964). Geist der Utopie, Bearbeitete Neuauflage der zweiten Fassung von 1923. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, E. (1965). Literarische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, E. (1968a). El ateísmo en el cristianismo, La religión del éxodo y del Rein (J. A. Gimbernat Ordeig, Trad.). Madrid: Taurus.
Bloch, E. (1968b). Thomas Münzer, teólogo de la revolución (J. Deike Robles, Trad.). Madrid: Ciencia Nueva.
Bloch, E. (1969). Philosophische Aufsätze zur objektiven Phantasie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, E. (1980). Derecho natural y dignidad humana (F. González Vicén, Trad.). Madrid: Aguilar.
Bloch, E. (1985a). Briefe 1903–1975, tomo 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, E. (1985b). Kampf, nicht Krieg, Politische Schriften 1917-1919. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, E. (1992). Gedanken über religiöse Dinge (1905). Ernst Bloch Almanach, 12, 9-13.
Bloch, E. (2004). El principio esperanza, tomo 1 (F. González Vicén, Trad.). Madrid: Trotta.
Bloch, E. (2005). Huellas (M. Salmerón Infante, Trad.). Madrid: Tecnos.
Bloch, E. (2007). El principio esperanza, tomo 3 (F. González Vicén, Trad.). Madrid: Trotta.
Bloch, E. (2019). Herencia de esta época (M. Salmerón Infante, Trad.). Madrid: Tecnos.
Dietschy, B. (2018a). Im Mischdunkel nationaler Berauschung. Ernst Blochs Erbschaft dieser Zeit, in Zeiten des Rechtspopulismus gelesen. Das Argument, 325, 31-44.
Dietschy, B. (2018b). Ernst Bloch, Thomas Müntzer y la memoria liberadora de la espiritualidad del “Hombre Común”. Actas Teológicas y Filosóficas, 23, 23-39.
Dinerstein, A. (2016). Organizando la esperanza: utopías concretas pluriversales contra y más allá de la forma valor. Educação & Sociedade, 37 (135), 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302016162414
Feuerbach, L. (1995). La esencia del cristianismo (J. Iglesias, Trad). Madrid: Trotta.
Harnack, A. (1961). History of Dogma. 7 tomos. (N. Buchanan, Trad.). New York: Dover.
Hodgson, P. (2007). Liberal Theology. A Radical Vision. Mineápolis: Fortress Press
Jay, M. (1984). Marxism and totality, The adventures of a concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Kant, I. (1981). La religión dentro de los límites de la mera razón (F. Martínez Marzoa, Trad.). Madrid: Alianza.
Kant, I. (2003). El conflicto de las facultades (R. Aramayo, Trad.). Madrid: Alianza.
Kracauer, S. (1990). Prophetentum (1922). Schriften, band 5.1. Aufsätze 1915-1926 (pp. 196-204). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp,
Löwy, M. & Sayre, R. (2009). Esprit de feu, Figures du romantisme anti-capitaliste. Paris: Éditions du Sandre.
Lukács, G. (2013). El alma y las formas (M. Sacristán, Trad.). Valencia: PUV.
Marx, K. (2014). Introducción a la crítica de la filosofía del derecho de Hegel (J. Ripalda, Trad.). Valencia: Pre-textos.
Mondragón González, A. (2005). Ernst Bloch: el peregrino de la esperanza. Estudios políticos (México), 4, 43-77. https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484903e.2005.4.37642
Münster, A. (1984). Figures de l’utopie dans la pensée d’Ernst Bloch. París: Aubier.
Nietzsche, F. (2007). La Gaya Ciencia (A. Mardomingo, Trad.). Madrid: Edaf.
Pelletier, L. (2010). Ernst Bloch et les juifs ; autour d’une traduction récente. Philosophiques, 37(1), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.7202/039724ar
Pineda Canabal, A. (2015). La noción de democracia mística en «Thomas Müntzer, teólogo de la revolución». Ápeiron. Estudios de filosofía (Edición conmemorativa. LI Congreso Filosofía Joven, Poder y movimientos), 277-291.
Puschner, U. (2017). The völkisch-religiöse Bewegung in the long in de siècle and National Socialism. Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte, 30(1), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.13109/kize.2017.30.1.162
Rabinbach, A. (1985). Between Enlightenment and Apocalypse: Benjamin, Bloch and Modern German Jewish Messianism. New German Critique, 34, 78-124. https://doi.org/10.2307/488340
Reboul, O. (1970). Kant et la religion. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 50(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhpr.1970.4010
Romagnoli, C. (2008). Ernst Bloch e la teologia politica. Prassi, mito ed escatologia. Europa e Messia. Paure e speranze del XX secolo in eredità, B@belonline/print, 4.
Tillich, P. (1991). Théologie systématique 4. La vie et l’Esprit (J.-M. Saint, Trad.). Genève: Labor et Fides.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Aníbal Pineda Canabal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
