The Sonderkommando photographs: a possibility for reconciled commemoration of a sublime historical event
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345415Keywords:
historical sublime, Elco Runia, Didi-Huberman, aesthetic experience, commemoration, identity, sublime historical experienceAbstract
In this paper I consider the four images from Auschwitz analyzed by Didi- Huberman in Images in Spite of All —the so-called Sonderkommando photographs— through the lens of the “historical sublime” as proposed by historian Eelco Runia. These photographs are taken as an example of a possible reconciled aesthetic experience with an “unimaginable” past that horrifies us. Moreover, I argue that aesthetic depictions are able to champion a model of historical commemoration which makes these events imaginable again. In order to show this, I will first employ the concept of the “sublime historical event” which Runia proposes to interpret the Holocaust’s historical catastrophe. Runia’s “historical sublime” provides a framework to understand the process of becoming what “we are no longer” through the invention of new identities that defy our former ones and explain historical discontinuities. Secondly, I will examine the Sonderkommando photographs by applying Runia’s notion of commemoration to the viewer’s aesthetic experience of these images. I will finally suggest the possibility of a reconciliation with our former identities, those who committed sublime historical acts with which we no longer identify, thanks to this aestheticized experience of commemoration.
Downloads
References
Ankersmit, F. R. (2005). Sublime historical experience. Stanford University Press.
Barthes, R. & Howard, R. (1982). Camera lucida: reflections on photography. Hill & Wang,
Benjamin, W., Tiedemann, R. & Schweppenha, H. (1989). Gesammelte Schriften, 7 vols. 7, 350–84. Suhrkamp Verlag.
Bratu Hansen, M. (2008). Benjamin’s Aura. Critical inquiry, 34(2), 336-375. https://doi. org/10.1086/529060
Burke, E. (1792). A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. J. J. Tourneisen.
Didi-Huberman, G. (2008). Images in spite of all. Four photographs from Auschwitz. Chicago University Press. Images in spite of all. Four photographs from Auschwitz
Jay, M. (2018). Sublime historical experience, real presence and photography. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 12(3), 432-449. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341406
Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press. Rancière, J. & Elliott, G. (2009). The emancipated spectator. Verso.
Rancière, J. & Rockhill, G. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: the distribution of the sensible. Continuum.
Robertson, F. (2010). The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility, and other writings on media. Vol. 51. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/ tech.0.0415
Runia, E. (2014). Moved by the past: discontinuity and historical mutation. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231168205.001.0001
Sanbonmatsu, J. (2009). The holocaust sublime: singularity, representation, and the violence of everyday life. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68(1), 101-126. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00617.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Paula Ramos Mollá
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
