Is bioethics a science?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345758

Keywords:

bioethics, science, ethical cognitivism, naturalism, normativity

Abstract


This article enquiries whether normative bioethics can be a science. The article aims to address the conditions of possibility for bioethics to be considered a science, without directly answering the question. The article focuses on two conditions that we typically associate with our common concept of science: truth and knowledge, on the one hand, and naturalization, on the other. Bioethics should be able to provide moral truths and therefore moral knowledge so that we could consider it as a science. On the other hand, the normative character of bioethics raises the question of whether it is possible to naturalize it and make it compatible with a scientific perspective. The article argues that, for normative bioethics to be considered a science, a cognitive and naturalistic stance should be taken on ethics.

|Abstract
= 911 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 8 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 111 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Gustavo Ortiz Millán, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

He is a Doctor of Philosophy from Columbia University in New York. Researcher at the Institute of Philosophical Research of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and researcher at the National System of Researchers of the National Council of Science and Technology. Member of the College of Bioethics.

References

Azariah, J. (2009). Bioethics science: is it? Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 2(18). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713923/

Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics, 7a ed. Oxford University Press.

Brink, D. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624612

Dilthey, W. (1883/1944). Introducción a las ciencias del espíritu. Obras I. (E. Ímaz, Trad.). FCE.

Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. Harvard University Press.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and reality. An introduction to the philosophy of science. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226300610.001.0001

Grasa Hernández, R. (1992). El evolucionismo: de Darwin a la sociobiología. Cincel.

Griffin, J. (2015). What can philosophy contribute to ethics? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198748090.001.0001

Holland, S. (2003). Bioethics. A philosophical introduction. Polity.

James, S. (2011). An introduction to evolutionary ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.

Joyce, R. (2006). The evolution of morality. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2880.001.0001

Kelly, E. (2004). Against naturalism in ethics. En M. De Caro & D. MacArthur (Comps.), Naturalism in question. Harvard University Press.

Kirchin, S. (2012). Mataethics. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284839

Mackie, J.L. (1977). Ethics: inventing right and wrong. Penguin.

Macklin, R. (1999). Against relativism. Cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. Oxford University Press.

McGrath, S. (2011). Skepticism about moral expertise as a puzzle for moral realism. The Journal of Philosophy, 108, 111–137. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201110837

Miller, A. (2003). An introduction to contemporary metaethics. Polity.

Pérez Tamayo, R. (1987). Acerca de Minerva. FCE.

Pérez Tamayo, R. (1990). ¿Existe el método científico? Historia y realidad. FCE.

Pérez Tamayo, R. (2010). ¿Qué es la ciencia?. Reflexiones sobre la ciencia (pp. 143-160). El Colegio Nacional-Seminario de Cultura Mexicana.

Pigden, C. (1993). Naturalism. En P. Singer (Comp.), A companion to ethics (pp. 421-431). Blackwell.

Potter, V.R. (1970). Bioethics, the science of survival. Perspectives in biology and medicine, 14, 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1970.0015

Quine, W.V.O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. From a logical point of view (pp. 20-26). Harvard University Press.

Ruse, M. (1998). Evolution and ethics: the sociobiological approach. En L. Pojman (Comp.), Ethical theory: classical and contemporary readings. Wadsworth.

Ruse, M. & Wilson, E. O. (1986). Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy, 61, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100021057

Russell, B. (1949/2001). The scientific outlook, 2a ed. Routledge.

Schlick, M. (1930/1965). ¿Qué pretende la ética? En A. J. Ayer (Comp.), El positivismo lógico (pp. 251-268). FCE.

Stevenson, C. (1944). Ethics and language. Yale University Press.

Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, 127, 109–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6

Toulmin, S. (1959). An examination of the place of reason in ethics. Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, E. O. (1980). Sociobiology. The abridged edition. Harvard University Press.

Wilson, E. O. (2011). La ciencia como la nueva filosofía. Entrevista con J. Baggini y J. Stangroom. Lo que piensan los filósofos. Paidós.

Wright, C. (1992). Truth and objectivity. Harvard University Press.

Wright, C. (1996). Truth in ethics. En B. Hooker (Comp.), Truth in ethics (pp. 1-18). Blackwell.

Published

2021-11-04 — Updated on 2022-01-31

How to Cite

Ortiz Millán, G. (2022). Is bioethics a science?. Estudios De Filosofía, (65), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345758

Issue

Section

Reflection article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.